严格相等运算符将告诉您两个对象类型是否相等。然而,是否有一种方法来判断两个对象是否相等,就像Java中的哈希码值一样?

堆栈溢出问题JavaScript中有hashCode函数吗?类似于这个问题,但需要一个更学术的答案。上面的场景说明了为什么有必要有一个,我想知道是否有等效的解决方案。


当前回答

对于那些使用Node的人来说,在本地util库中有一个叫做isDeepStrictEqual的方便方法可以实现这一点。

const util = require('util');

const obj1 = {
  foo: "bar",
  baz: [1, 2]
};

const obj2 = {
  foo: "bar",
  baz: [1, 2]
};


obj1 == obj2 // false
util.isDeepStrictEqual(obj1, obj2) // true

https://nodejs.org/api/util.html#util_util_isdeepstrictequal_val1_val2

其他回答

let std1 = {
  name: "Abhijeet",
  roll: 1
}

let std2 = {
  name: "Siddharth",
  roll: 2
}

console.log(JSON.stringify(std1) === JSON.stringify(std2))

我也遇到了同样的问题,并决定自己编写解决方案。但是因为我也想比较数组和对象,反之亦然,所以我设计了一个通用的解决方案。我决定将函数添加到原型中,但是可以很容易地将它们重写为独立的函数。代码如下:

Array.prototype.equals = Object.prototype.equals = function(b) {
    var ar = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(b));
    var err = false;
    for(var key in this) {
        if(this.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
            var found = ar.find(this[key]);
            if(found > -1) {
                if(Object.prototype.toString.call(ar) === "[object Object]") {
                    delete ar[Object.keys(ar)[found]];
                }
                else {
                    ar.splice(found, 1);
                }
            }
            else {
                err = true;
                break;
            }
        }
    };
    if(Object.keys(ar).length > 0 || err) {
        return false;
    }
    return true;
}

Array.prototype.find = Object.prototype.find = function(v) {
    var f = -1;
    for(var i in this) {
        if(this.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
            if(Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Array]" || Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Object]") {
                if(this[i].equals(v)) {
                    f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
                }
            }
            else if(this[i] === v) {
                f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
            }
        }
    }
    return f;
}

本算法分为两部分;equals函数本身和一个在数组/对象中查找属性数值索引的函数。find函数只需要,因为indexof只查找数字和字符串,不查找对象。

我们可以这样称呼它:

({a: 1, b: "h"}).equals({a: 1, b: "h"});

函数返回true或false,在本例中为true。 算法als允许在非常复杂的对象之间进行比较:

({a: 1, b: "hello", c: ["w", "o", "r", "l", "d", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}]}).equals({b: "hello", a: 1, c: ["w", "d", "o", "r", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}, "l"]})

上面的例子将返回true,即使属性的顺序不同。需要注意的一个小细节:这段代码还检查两个变量的相同类型,因此“3”与3不同。

简短的回答

简单的答案是:不,没有一般的方法来确定一个对象等于另一个你所指的意义。例外情况是当您严格地认为一个对象是无类型的。

长话短说

这个概念是一个Equals方法,它比较一个对象的两个不同实例,以指示它们在值级别上是否相等。但是,定义Equals方法应该如何实现取决于具体的类型。对具有基本值的属性进行迭代比较可能还不够:对象可能包含与相等无关的属性。例如,

 function MyClass(a, b)
 {
     var c;
     this.getCLazy = function() {
         if (c === undefined) c = a * b // imagine * is really expensive
         return c;
     }
  }

在上面的例子中,c对于确定MyClass的任何两个实例是否相等并不重要,只有a和b是重要的。在某些情况下,c可能在不同实例之间有所不同,但在比较中并不显著。

注意,当成员本身也可能是某个类型的实例,并且每个实例都需要有确定相等的方法时,这个问题就会出现。

更复杂的是,在JavaScript中,数据和方法之间的区别是模糊的。

一个对象可以引用一个作为事件处理程序调用的方法,这可能不被认为是其“值状态”的一部分。然而,另一个对象很可能被分配一个执行重要计算的函数,从而使这个实例与其他实例不同,仅仅因为它引用了不同的函数。

如果一个对象的现有原型方法被另一个函数覆盖,该怎么办?它还能被认为与另一个相同的实例相等吗?这个问题只能在每种类型的具体情况下回答。

如前所述,异常将是一个严格的无类型对象。在这种情况下,唯一明智的选择是对每个成员进行迭代和递归比较。即使这样,人们也要问一个函数的“值”是什么?

从我的个人库中取出,我经常用它来工作。下面的函数是一个宽大的递归深度等号,它不检查

阶级平等 继承的值 价值观严格平等

我主要用这个来检查我是否得到了对各种API实现的相等的回复。可能会出现实现差异(如字符串与数字)和额外的空值。

它的实现非常简单(如果去掉所有注释的话)

/** Recursively check if both objects are equal in value *** *** This function is designed to use multiple methods from most probable *** (and in most cases) valid, to the more regid and complex method. *** *** One of the main principles behind the various check is that while *** some of the simpler checks such as == or JSON may cause false negatives, *** they do not cause false positives. As such they can be safely run first. *** *** # !Important Note: *** as this function is designed for simplified deep equal checks it is not designed *** for the following *** *** - Class equality, (ClassA().a = 1) maybe valid to (ClassB().b = 1) *** - Inherited values, this actually ignores them *** - Values being strictly equal, "1" is equal to 1 (see the basic equality check on this) *** - Performance across all cases. This is designed for high performance on the *** most probable cases of == / JSON equality. Consider bench testing, if you have *** more 'complex' requirments *** *** @param objA : First object to compare *** @param objB : 2nd object to compare *** @param .... : Any other objects to compare *** *** @returns true if all equals, or false if invalid *** *** @license Copyright by eugene@picoded.com, 2012. *** Licensed under the MIT license: http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT **/ function simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(objA, objB) { // Multiple comparision check //-------------------------------------------- var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments); if(args.length > 2) { for(var a=1; a<args.length; ++a) { if(!simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(args[a-1], args[a])) { return false; } } return true; } else if(args.length < 2) { throw "simpleRecusiveDeepEqual, requires atleast 2 arguments"; } // basic equality check, //-------------------------------------------- // if this succed the 2 basic values is equal, // such as numbers and string. // // or its actually the same object pointer. Bam // // Note that if string and number strictly equal is required // change the equality from ==, to === // if(objA == objB) { return true; } // If a value is a bsic type, and failed above. This fails var basicTypes = ["boolean", "number", "string"]; if( basicTypes.indexOf(typeof objA) >= 0 || basicTypes.indexOf(typeof objB) >= 0 ) { return false; } // JSON equality check, //-------------------------------------------- // this can fail, if the JSON stringify the objects in the wrong order // for example the following may fail, due to different string order: // // JSON.stringify( {a:1, b:2} ) == JSON.stringify( {b:2, a:1} ) // if(JSON.stringify(objA) == JSON.stringify(objB)) { return true; } // Array equality check //-------------------------------------------- // This is performed prior to iteration check, // Without this check the following would have been considered valid // // simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( { 0:1963 }, [1963] ); // // Note that u may remove this segment if this is what is intended // if( Array.isArray(objA) ) { //objA is array, objB is not an array if( !Array.isArray(objB) ) { return false; } } else if( Array.isArray(objB) ) { //objA is not array, objB is an array return false; } // Nested values iteration //-------------------------------------------- // Scan and iterate all the nested values, and check for non equal values recusively // // Note that this does not check against null equality, remove the various "!= null" // if this is required var i; //reuse var to iterate // Check objA values against objB for (i in objA) { //Protect against inherited properties if(objA.hasOwnProperty(i)) { if(objB.hasOwnProperty(i)) { // Check if deep equal is valid if(!simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( objA[i], objB[i] )) { return false; } } else if(objA[i] != null) { //ignore null values in objA, that objB does not have //else fails return false; } } } // Check if objB has additional values, that objA do not, fail if so for (i in objB) { if(objB.hasOwnProperty(i)) { if(objB[i] != null && !objA.hasOwnProperty(i)) { //ignore null values in objB, that objA does not have //else fails return false; } } } // End of all checks //-------------------------------------------- // By reaching here, all iteration scans have been done. // and should have returned false if it failed return true; } // Sanity checking of simpleRecusiveDeepEqual (function() { if( // Basic checks !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual({}, {}) || !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual([], []) || !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(['a'], ['a']) || // Not strict checks !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual("1", 1) || // Multiple objects check !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( { a:[1,2] }, { a:[1,2] }, { a:[1,2] } ) || // Ensure distinction between array and object (the following should fail) simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( [1963], { 0:1963 } ) || // Null strict checks simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( 0, null ) || simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( "", null ) || // Last "false" exists to make the various check above easy to comment in/out false ) { alert("FATAL ERROR: simpleRecusiveDeepEqual failed basic checks"); } else { //added this last line, for SO snippet alert on success alert("simpleRecusiveDeepEqual: Passed all checks, Yays!"); } })();

这里有一个非常基本的方法来检查对象的“值是否相等”。

var john = {
    occupation: "Web Developer",
    age: 25
};

var bobby = {
    occupation: "Web Developer",
    age: 25
};

function isEquivalent(a, b) {
    // Create arrays of property names

    var aProps = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(a);
    var bProps = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(b);

    // If number of properties is different, objects are not equivalent

    if (aProps.length != bProps.length) {
        return false;
    }

    for (var i = 0; i < aProps.length; i++) {
        var propName = aProps[i];

        // If values of same property are not equal, objects are not equivalent
        if (a[propName] !== b[propName]) {
           return false;
        }
    }

    // If we made it this far, objects are considered equivalent
    return true;
}

// Outputs: true
console.log(isEquivalent(john, bobby));

演示 - JSFiddle

如你所见,为了检查对象的“值是否相等”,我们本质上必须遍历对象中的每个属性,以查看它们是否相等。虽然这个简单的实现适用于我们的示例,但有很多情况它无法处理。例如:

如果其中一个属性值本身就是一个对象呢? 如果属性值之一是NaN(中唯一的值 JavaScript不等于它自己?) 如果a有一个值为undefined的属性,而b没有呢 这个属性(因此计算为undefined?)

对于一个健壮的检查对象“值是否相等”的方法,最好依赖于一个经过良好测试的库,它涵盖了各种边缘情况,如下划线。

var john = {
    occupation: "Web Developer",
    age: 25
};

var bobby = {
    occupation: "Web Developer",
    age: 25
};

// Outputs: true
console.log(_.isEqual(john, bobby));

演示 - JSFiddle