更新onStartCommand中的数据(…)

上绑定（...

与onCreate(…)相比，onBind(…)是一个更好的生命周期事件来初始化start前台，因为onBind(…)传递了一个Intent，其中可能包含初始化服务所需的Bundle中的重要数据。然而，这是不必要的，因为onStartCommand(…)是在服务第一次创建或后续多次调用时调用的。

onStartCommand（...）

onStartCommand(…)中的start前台是很重要的，以便在服务创建后更新它。

当ContextCompat.startForegroundService(…)在服务创建后被调用时，onBind(…)和onCreate(…)没有被调用。因此，更新后的数据可以通过Intent Bundle传递到onStartCommand(…)来更新服务中的数据。

样本

我使用这个模式在Coinverse加密货币新闻应用程序中实现PlayerNotificationManager。

Activity / Fragment.kt

context?.bindService(
        Intent(context, AudioService::class.java),
        serviceConnection, Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE)
ContextCompat.startForegroundService(
        context!!,
        Intent(context, AudioService::class.java).apply {
            action = CONTENT_SELECTED_ACTION
            putExtra(CONTENT_SELECTED_KEY, contentToPlay.content.apply {
                audioUrl = uri.toString()
            })
        })

AudioService.kt

private var uri: Uri = Uri.parse("")

override fun onBind(intent: Intent?) =
        AudioServiceBinder().apply {
            player = ExoPlayerFactory.newSimpleInstance(
                    applicationContext,
                    AudioOnlyRenderersFactory(applicationContext),
                    DefaultTrackSelector())
        }

override fun onStartCommand(intent: Intent?, flags: Int, startId: Int): Int {
    intent?.let {
        when (intent.action) {
            CONTENT_SELECTED_ACTION -> it.getParcelableExtra<Content>(CONTENT_SELECTED_KEY).also { content ->
                val intentUri = Uri.parse(content.audioUrl)
                // Checks whether to update Uri passed in Intent Bundle.
                if (!intentUri.equals(uri)) {
                    uri = intentUri
                    player?.prepare(ProgressiveMediaSource.Factory(
                            DefaultDataSourceFactory(
                                    this,
                                    Util.getUserAgent(this, getString(app_name))))
                            .createMediaSource(uri))
                    player?.playWhenReady = true
                    // Calling 'startForeground' in 'buildNotification(...)'.          
                    buildNotification(intent.getParcelableExtra(CONTENT_SELECTED_KEY))
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId)
}

// Calling 'startForeground' in 'onNotificationStarted(...)'.
private fun buildNotification(content: Content): Unit? {
    playerNotificationManager = PlayerNotificationManager.createWithNotificationChannel(
            this,
            content.title,
            app_name,
            if (!content.audioUrl.isNullOrEmpty()) 1 else -1,
            object : PlayerNotificationManager.MediaDescriptionAdapter {
                override fun createCurrentContentIntent(player: Player?) = ...
                override fun getCurrentContentText(player: Player?) = ...
                override fun getCurrentContentTitle(player: Player?) = ...
                override fun getCurrentLargeIcon(player: Player?,
                                                 callback: PlayerNotificationManager.BitmapCallback?) = ...
            },
            object : PlayerNotificationManager.NotificationListener {
                override fun onNotificationStarted(notificationId: Int, notification: Notification) {
                    startForeground(notificationId, notification)
                }
                override fun onNotificationCancelled(notificationId: Int) {
                    stopForeground(true)
                    stopSelf()
                }
            })
    return playerNotificationManager.setPlayer(player)
}

提醒一下，我在这上面浪费了太多时间。我一直得到这个异常，即使我调用start前台(..)作为onCreate(..)的第一件事。 最后，我发现这个问题是由于使用NOTIFICATION_ID = 0引起的。使用任何其他值似乎都可以解决这个问题。

此错误也发生在Android 8+服务时。start前台(int id, Notification Notification)在id设置为0时被调用。

id int:该通知的标识符，根据NotificationManager。通知(int、通知);一定不是0。

好吧，我注意到的一些东西可能也会对其他人有所帮助。这是严格的测试，看看我是否能找出如何解决我所看到的事件。为了简单起见，假设我有一个从演示者调用这个的方法。

context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, TaskQueueExecutorService.class));

try {
    Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}       

这将导致同样的错误。在方法完成之前，服务不会启动，因此服务中没有onCreate()。

So even if you update the UI off the main thread, IF you have anything that might hold up that method after it, it won't start on time and give you the dreaded Foreground Error. In my case we were loading some things onto a queue and each called startForegroundService, but some logic was involved with each in the background. So if the logic took too long to finish that method since they were called back to back, crash time. The old startService just ignored it and went on it's way and since we called it each time, the next round would finish up.

这让我想知道，如果我从后台线程调用服务，它是否可以在启动时完全绑定并立即运行，因此我开始试验。即使这样不会立即启动，它也不会崩溃。

new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).post(new Runnable() {
        public void run() {
               context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, 
           TaskQueueExecutorService.class));
               try {
                   Thread.sleep(10000);
               } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                  e.printStackTrace();
              }       
        }
});

我不会假装知道为什么它没有崩溃，尽管我怀疑这迫使它等待，直到主线程能够及时处理它。我知道将它绑定到主线程并不理想，但由于我的使用是在后台调用它，所以我并不真正关心它是否等待完成而不是崩溃。

因为每个来这里的人都遭受着同样的痛苦，我想分享我的解决方法，之前没有人尝试过(在这个问题中)。我可以向您保证，它是工作的，甚至在一个停止的断点上确认这个方法。

问题是调用服务。start前台(id, notification)来自服务本身，对吧?不幸的是，Android框架不保证调用服务。Service.onCreate()中的start前台(id, notification)在5秒内，但无论如何都会抛出异常，所以我想出了这种方法。

Bind the service to a context with a binder from the service before calling Context.startForegroundService() If the bind is successful, call Context.startForegroundService() from the service connection and immediately call Service.startForeground() inside the service connection. IMPORTANT NOTE: Call the Context.bindService() method inside a try-catch because in some occasions the call can throw an exception, in which case you need to rely on calling Context.startForegroundService() directly and hope it will not fail. An example can be a broadcast receiver context, however getting application context does not throw an exception in that case, but using the context directly does.

这甚至可以在我绑定服务后和触发“startForeground”调用之前等待断点时工作。等待3-4秒不会触发异常，而5秒后会抛出异常。(如果设备不能在5秒内执行两行代码，那么就该把它扔进垃圾桶了。)

因此，首先创建一个服务连接。

// Create the service connection.
ServiceConnection connection = new ServiceConnection()
{
    @Override
    public void onServiceConnected(ComponentName name, IBinder service)
    {
        // The binder of the service that returns the instance that is created.
        MyService.LocalBinder binder = (MyService.LocalBinder) service;

        // The getter method to acquire the service.
        MyService myService = binder.getService();

        // getServiceIntent(context) returns the relative service intent 
        context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));

        // This is the key: Without waiting Android Framework to call this method
        // inside Service.onCreate(), immediately call here to post the notification.
        myService.startForeground(myNotificationId, MyService.getNotification());

        // Release the connection to prevent leaks.
        context.unbindService(this);
    }

    @Override
    public void onBindingDied(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Binding has dead.");
    }

    @Override
    public void onNullBinding(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Bind was null.");
    }

    @Override
    public void onServiceDisconnected(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Service is disconnected..");
    }
};

在服务内部，创建一个返回服务实例的绑定器。

public class MyService extends Service
{
    public class LocalBinder extends Binder
    {
        public MyService getService()
        {
            return MyService.this;
        }
    }

    // Create the instance on the service.
    private final LocalBinder binder = new LocalBinder();

    // Return this instance from onBind method.
    // You may also return new LocalBinder() which is
    // basically the same thing.
    @Nullable
    @Override
    public IBinder onBind(Intent intent)
    {
        return binder;
    }
}

然后，尝试从该上下文中绑定服务。如果成功，它将从您正在使用的服务连接调用serviceconnection . onserviceconnconnected()方法。然后，处理上面所示代码中的逻辑。示例代码如下所示:

// Try to bind the service
try
{
     context.bindService(getServiceIntent(context), connection,
                    Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE);
}
catch (RuntimeException ignored)
{
     // This is probably a broadcast receiver context even though we are calling getApplicationContext().
     // Just call startForegroundService instead since we cannot bind a service to a
     // broadcast receiver context. The service also have to call startForeground in
     // this case.
     context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));
}

它似乎在我开发的应用程序上工作，所以当你尝试时它应该也能工作。

我在Pixel 3和Android 11中遇到了一个问题，当我的服务运行得很短时，前台通知没有被取消。

在stopForeground() stopSelf()之前添加100ms的延迟似乎有所帮助。

人们在这里写道，stopprospect()应该在stopSelf()之前被调用。我不能确认，但我猜它不会费心去做。

public class AService extends Service {

@Override
public void onCreate() {
    if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.Q) {
        startForeground(
            getForegroundNotificationId(),
            channelManager.buildBackgroundInfoNotification(getNotificationTitle(), getNotificationText()),
            ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_DATA_SYNC);
    } else {
        startForeground(getForegroundNotificationId(),
            channelManager.buildBackgroundInfoNotification(getNotificationTitle(), getNotificationText())
        );
    }

@Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
    startForeground();

    if (hasQueueMoreItems()) {
        startWorkerThreads();
    } else {
        stopForeground(true);
        stopSelf();
    }
    return START_STICKY;
}

private class WorkerRunnable implements Runnable {

    @Override
    public void run() {

        while (getItem() != null && !isLoopInterrupted) {
            doSomething(getItem())   
        }

        waitALittle();
        stopForeground(true);
        stopSelf();
    }

    private void waitALittle() {
        try {
            Thread.sleep(100);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}
}