为什么这个问题会发生，因为Android框架不能保证你的服务在5秒内启动，但另一方面，框架确实有严格的限制前台通知必须在5秒内触发，而不检查框架是否试图启动服务。

这绝对是一个框架问题，但并不是所有面临这个问题的开发人员都尽力了:

一个通知必须同时在onCreate和onStartCommand中，因为如果你的服务已经被创建并且你的activity试图再次启动它，onCreate将不会被调用。 通知ID不能为0，否则即使原因不同，也会发生相同的崩溃。 在start前台之前不能调用stopSelf。

有了以上3个，这个问题可以减少一点，但仍然不是一个解决方案，真正的解决方案或让我们说的变通办法是把你的目标sdk版本降低到25。

请注意，Android P很可能仍然会有这个问题，因为谷歌甚至拒绝理解发生了什么，不相信这是他们的错，阅读#36和#56以获得更多信息

我调用ContextCompat。startForegroundService(this, intent)然后启动服务

在服务onCreate中

 @Override
 public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();

        if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 26) {
            String CHANNEL_ID = "my_channel_01";
            NotificationChannel channel = new NotificationChannel(CHANNEL_ID,
                    "Channel human readable title",
                    NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_DEFAULT);

            ((NotificationManager) getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE)).createNotificationChannel(channel);

            Notification notification = new NotificationCompat.Builder(this, CHANNEL_ID)
                    .setContentTitle("")
                    .setContentText("").build();

            startForeground(1, notification);
        }
}

因为每个来这里的人都遭受着同样的痛苦，我想分享我的解决方法，之前没有人尝试过(在这个问题中)。我可以向您保证，它是工作的，甚至在一个停止的断点上确认这个方法。

问题是调用服务。start前台(id, notification)来自服务本身，对吧?不幸的是，Android框架不保证调用服务。Service.onCreate()中的start前台(id, notification)在5秒内，但无论如何都会抛出异常，所以我想出了这种方法。

Bind the service to a context with a binder from the service before calling Context.startForegroundService() If the bind is successful, call Context.startForegroundService() from the service connection and immediately call Service.startForeground() inside the service connection. IMPORTANT NOTE: Call the Context.bindService() method inside a try-catch because in some occasions the call can throw an exception, in which case you need to rely on calling Context.startForegroundService() directly and hope it will not fail. An example can be a broadcast receiver context, however getting application context does not throw an exception in that case, but using the context directly does.

这甚至可以在我绑定服务后和触发“startForeground”调用之前等待断点时工作。等待3-4秒不会触发异常，而5秒后会抛出异常。(如果设备不能在5秒内执行两行代码，那么就该把它扔进垃圾桶了。)

因此，首先创建一个服务连接。

// Create the service connection.
ServiceConnection connection = new ServiceConnection()
{
    @Override
    public void onServiceConnected(ComponentName name, IBinder service)
    {
        // The binder of the service that returns the instance that is created.
        MyService.LocalBinder binder = (MyService.LocalBinder) service;

        // The getter method to acquire the service.
        MyService myService = binder.getService();

        // getServiceIntent(context) returns the relative service intent 
        context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));

        // This is the key: Without waiting Android Framework to call this method
        // inside Service.onCreate(), immediately call here to post the notification.
        myService.startForeground(myNotificationId, MyService.getNotification());

        // Release the connection to prevent leaks.
        context.unbindService(this);
    }

    @Override
    public void onBindingDied(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Binding has dead.");
    }

    @Override
    public void onNullBinding(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Bind was null.");
    }

    @Override
    public void onServiceDisconnected(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Service is disconnected..");
    }
};

在服务内部，创建一个返回服务实例的绑定器。

public class MyService extends Service
{
    public class LocalBinder extends Binder
    {
        public MyService getService()
        {
            return MyService.this;
        }
    }

    // Create the instance on the service.
    private final LocalBinder binder = new LocalBinder();

    // Return this instance from onBind method.
    // You may also return new LocalBinder() which is
    // basically the same thing.
    @Nullable
    @Override
    public IBinder onBind(Intent intent)
    {
        return binder;
    }
}

然后，尝试从该上下文中绑定服务。如果成功，它将从您正在使用的服务连接调用serviceconnection . onserviceconnconnected()方法。然后，处理上面所示代码中的逻辑。示例代码如下所示:

// Try to bind the service
try
{
     context.bindService(getServiceIntent(context), connection,
                    Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE);
}
catch (RuntimeException ignored)
{
     // This is probably a broadcast receiver context even though we are calling getApplicationContext().
     // Just call startForegroundService instead since we cannot bind a service to a
     // broadcast receiver context. The service also have to call startForeground in
     // this case.
     context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));
}

它似乎在我开发的应用程序上工作，所以当你尝试时它应该也能工作。

我在@humazed答案中添加了一些代码。所以没有初始通知。这可能是个变通办法，但对我来说很管用。

@Override
 public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();

        if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 26) {
            String CHANNEL_ID = "my_channel_01";
            NotificationChannel channel = new NotificationChannel(CHANNEL_ID,
                    "Channel human readable title",
                    NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_DEFAULT);

            ((NotificationManager) getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE)).createNotificationChannel(channel);

            Notification notification = new NotificationCompat.Builder(this, CHANNEL_ID)
                    .setContentTitle("")
                    .setContentText("")
                    .setColor(ContextCompat.getColor(this, R.color.transparentColor))
                    .setSmallIcon(ContextCompat.getColor(this, R.color.transparentColor)).build();

            startForeground(1, notification);
        }
}

我在小图标和通知上添加了transparentColor。 它会起作用的。

一个问题可能是服务类没有在AndroidManifest文件中启用。 也请检查一下。

<service
        android:name=".AudioRecorderService"
        android:enabled="true"
        android:exported="false"
        android:foregroundServiceType="microphone" />

好吧，我注意到的一些东西可能也会对其他人有所帮助。这是严格的测试，看看我是否能找出如何解决我所看到的事件。为了简单起见，假设我有一个从演示者调用这个的方法。

context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, TaskQueueExecutorService.class));

try {
    Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}       

这将导致同样的错误。在方法完成之前，服务不会启动，因此服务中没有onCreate()。

So even if you update the UI off the main thread, IF you have anything that might hold up that method after it, it won't start on time and give you the dreaded Foreground Error. In my case we were loading some things onto a queue and each called startForegroundService, but some logic was involved with each in the background. So if the logic took too long to finish that method since they were called back to back, crash time. The old startService just ignored it and went on it's way and since we called it each time, the next round would finish up.

这让我想知道，如果我从后台线程调用服务，它是否可以在启动时完全绑定并立即运行，因此我开始试验。即使这样不会立即启动，它也不会崩溃。

new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).post(new Runnable() {
        public void run() {
               context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, 
           TaskQueueExecutorService.class));
               try {
                   Thread.sleep(10000);
               } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                  e.printStackTrace();
              }       
        }
});

我不会假装知道为什么它没有崩溃，尽管我怀疑这迫使它等待，直到主线程能够及时处理它。我知道将它绑定到主线程并不理想，但由于我的使用是在后台调用它，所以我并不真正关心它是否等待完成而不是崩溃。