我在Pixel 3和Android 11中遇到了一个问题，当我的服务运行得很短时，前台通知没有被取消。

在stopForeground() stopSelf()之前添加100ms的延迟似乎有所帮助。

人们在这里写道，stopprospect()应该在stopSelf()之前被调用。我不能确认，但我猜它不会费心去做。

public class AService extends Service {

@Override
public void onCreate() {
    if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.Q) {
        startForeground(
            getForegroundNotificationId(),
            channelManager.buildBackgroundInfoNotification(getNotificationTitle(), getNotificationText()),
            ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_DATA_SYNC);
    } else {
        startForeground(getForegroundNotificationId(),
            channelManager.buildBackgroundInfoNotification(getNotificationTitle(), getNotificationText())
        );
    }

@Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
    startForeground();

    if (hasQueueMoreItems()) {
        startWorkerThreads();
    } else {
        stopForeground(true);
        stopSelf();
    }
    return START_STICKY;
}

private class WorkerRunnable implements Runnable {

    @Override
    public void run() {

        while (getItem() != null && !isLoopInterrupted) {
            doSomething(getItem())   
        }

        waitALittle();
        stopForeground(true);
        stopSelf();
    }

    private void waitALittle() {
        try {
            Thread.sleep(100);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}
}

提醒一下，我在这上面浪费了太多时间。我一直得到这个异常，即使我调用start前台(..)作为onCreate(..)的第一件事。 最后，我发现这个问题是由于使用NOTIFICATION_ID = 0引起的。使用任何其他值似乎都可以解决这个问题。

当使用目标sdk 28或更高版本时，你必须为android 9设备添加如下权限，否则异常总是会发生:

<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.FOREGROUND_SERVICE" />

服务

class TestService : Service() {

    override fun onCreate() {
        super.onCreate()
        Log.d(TAG, "onCreate")

        val nBuilder = NotificationCompat.Builder(this, "all")
            .setSmallIcon(R.drawable.ic_launcher_foreground)
            .setContentTitle("TestService")
            .setPriority(NotificationCompat.PRIORITY_DEFAULT)
        startForeground(1337, nBuilder.build())
    }

    override fun onStartCommand(intent: Intent?, flags: Int, startId: Int): Int {
        val rtn = super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId)

        if (intent?.action == STOP_ACTION) {
            Log.d(TAG, "onStartCommand -> STOP")
            stopForeground(true)
            stopSelf()
        } else {
            Log.d(TAG, "onStartCommand -> START")
        }

        return rtn
    }

    override fun onDestroy() {
        Log.d(TAG, "onDestroy")
        super.onDestroy()
    }

    override fun onBind(intent: Intent?): IBinder? = null

    companion object {

        private val TAG = "TestService"
        private val STOP_ACTION = "ly.zen.test.TestService.ACTION_STOP"

        fun start(context: Context) {
            ContextCompat.startForegroundService(context, Intent(context, TestService::class.java))
        }

        fun stop(context: Context) {
            val intent = Intent(context, TestService::class.java)
            intent.action = STOP_ACTION
            ContextCompat.startForegroundService(context, intent)
        }

    }

}

测试人员

val nChannel = NotificationChannel("all", "All", NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_NONE)
val nManager = getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE) as NotificationManager
nManager.createNotificationChannel(nChannel)

start_test_service.setOnClickListener {
    TestService.start(this@MainActivity)
    TestService.stop(this@MainActivity)
}

结果

D/TestService: onCreate
D/TestService: onStartCommand -> START
D/TestService: onStartCommand -> STOP
D/TestService: onDestroy

我一直在研究这个问题，这是我目前为止的发现。如果我们有类似这样的代码，就会发生崩溃:

MyForegroundService.java

public class MyForegroundService extends Service {
    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();
        startForeground(...);
    }
}

MainActivity.java

Intent serviceIntent = new Intent(this, MyForegroundService.class);
startForegroundService(serviceIntent);
...
stopService(serviceIntent);

异常在以下代码块中抛出:

ActiveServices.java

private final void bringDownServiceLocked(ServiceRecord r) {
    ...
    if (r.fgRequired) {
        Slog.w(TAG_SERVICE, "Bringing down service while still waiting for start foreground: "
                  + r);
        r.fgRequired = false;
        r.fgWaiting = false;
        mAm.mAppOpsService.finishOperation(AppOpsManager.getToken(mAm.mAppOpsService),
                    AppOpsManager.OP_START_FOREGROUND, r.appInfo.uid, r.packageName);
        mAm.mHandler.removeMessages(
                    ActivityManagerService.SERVICE_FOREGROUND_TIMEOUT_MSG, r);
        if (r.app != null) {
            Message msg = mAm.mHandler.obtainMessage(
                ActivityManagerService.SERVICE_FOREGROUND_CRASH_MSG);
            msg.obj = r.app;
            msg.getData().putCharSequence(
                ActivityManagerService.SERVICE_RECORD_KEY, r.toString());
            mAm.mHandler.sendMessage(msg);
         }
    }
    ...
}

这个方法在MyForegroundService的onCreate()之前执行，因为Android在主线程处理程序上安排了服务的创建，但在BinderThread上调用了bringdownservicelock，这是一个竞争条件。这意味着MyForegroundService没有机会调用start前台，这将导致崩溃。

为了解决这个问题，我们必须确保在MyForegroundService的onCreate()之前不调用bringdownservicellocked。

public class MyForegroundService extends Service {

    private static final String ACTION_STOP = "com.example.MyForegroundService.ACTION_STOP";

    private final BroadcastReceiver stopReceiver = new BroadcastReceiver() {
        @Override
        public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
            context.removeStickyBroadcast(intent);
            stopForeground(true);
            stopSelf();
        }
    };

    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();
        startForeground(...);
        registerReceiver(
            stopReceiver, new IntentFilter(ACTION_STOP));
    }

    @Override
    public void onDestroy() {
        super.onDestroy();
        unregisterReceiver(stopReceiver);
    }

    public static void stop(Context context) {
        context.sendStickyBroadcast(new Intent(ACTION_STOP));
    }
}

通过使用粘性广播，我们确保广播不会丢失，stopReceiver在MyForegroundService的onCreate()中注册后立即接收到停止意图。此时我们已经调用了startForeground(…)。我们还必须删除这个粘滞的广播，以防止下一次stopReceiver被通知。

请注意，sendStickyBroadcast方法已弃用，我仅将其用作解决此问题的临时方法。

即使在Service中调用start前台之后，如果我们在onCreate调用之前调用stopService，它也会在某些设备上崩溃。 所以，我通过启动附加标志的服务来修复这个问题:

Intent intent = new Intent(context, YourService.class);
intent.putExtra("request_stop", true);
context.startService(intent);

并在onStartCommand中添加了一个检查，看看它是否已经开始停止:

@Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
    //call startForeground first
    if (intent != null) {
        boolean stopService = intent.getBooleanExtra("request_stop", false);
        if (stopService) {
            stopSelf();
        }
    }

    //Continue with the background task
    return START_STICKY;
}

附注:如果服务没有运行，它将首先启动服务，这是一种开销。