我想知道这在SQL中是否可行。假设你有两个表A和B,你在表A上做一个选择,在表B上做一个连接:

SELECT a.*, b.* FROM TABLE_A a JOIN TABLE_B b USING (some_id);

如果表A有“a_id”、“name”、“some_id”列,表B有“b_id”、“name”、“some_id”列,查询将返回“a_id”、“name”、“some_id”、“b_id”、“name”、“some_id”列。有什么方法可以为表B的列名加上前缀而不单独列出每一列吗?等价于这个:

SELECT a.*, b.b_id as 'b.b_id', b.name as 'b.name', b.some_id as 'b.some_id'
FROM TABLE_A a JOIN TABLE_B b USING (some_id);

但是,如前所述,没有列出每一列,所以像这样:

SELECT a.*, b.* as 'b.*'
FROM TABLE_A a JOIN TABLE_B b USING (some_id);

基本上就是说,“用‘something’为b.*返回的每一列添加前缀”。这可能吗,还是我运气不好?

编辑

关于不使用SELECT *等的建议是有效的建议,但与我的上下文无关,因此请关注眼前的问题——是否可以在连接中为表的所有列名添加前缀(SQL查询中指定的常量)?

我的最终目标是能够通过连接对两个表执行SELECT *操作,并且能够从结果集中获得的列的名称中分辨出哪些列来自表a,哪些列来自表b。同样,我不想单独列出列,我需要能够执行SELECT *操作。


当前回答

我在PostgreSQL 13中使用to_jsonb函数来获得连接表中的所有字段作为一列。

select
  TABLE_A.*,
  to_jsonb(TABLE_B.*) as b,
  to_jsonb(TABLE_C.*) as c
from TABLE_A
left join TABLE_B on TABLE_B.a_id=TABLE_A.id
left join TABLE_C on TABLE_C.a_id=TABLE_A.id
where TABLE_A.id=1

结果你会得到TABLE_A列加上b和c列的数量:

id name some_other_col b c
1 Some name Some other value {"id":1,"a_id":1,"prop":"value"} {"id":1,"a_id":1,"prop":"value"}
1 Some other name Another value {"id":1,"a_id":1,"prop":"value"} {"id":1,"a_id":1,"prop":"value"}

您只需要解析b和c列以将它们转换为对象。

其他回答

从这个解决方案出发,我将如何处理这个问题:

首先创建一个所有AS语句的列表:

DECLARE @asStatements varchar(8000)

SELECT @asStatements = ISNULL(@asStatements + ', ','') + QUOTENAME(table_name) + '.' + QUOTENAME(column_name) + ' AS ' + '[' + table_name + '.' + column_name + ']'
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TABLE_A' OR TABLE_NAME = 'TABLE_B'
ORDER BY ORDINAL_POSITION

然后在你的查询中使用它:

EXEC('SELECT ' + @asStatements + ' FROM TABLE_A a JOIN TABLE_B b USING (some_id)');

然而,这可能需要修改,因为类似的东西只在SQL Server中测试。但是这段代码在SQL Server中并不完全有效,因为不支持USING。

请评论,如果你可以测试/纠正这段代码,例如MySQL。

或者你可以使用Red Gate SQL Refactor或SQL Prompt,它通过单击Tab按钮将SELECT *展开为列列表

所以在你的例子中,如果你输入SELECT * FROM A JOIN B… 转到*的末尾,Tab键,瞧!你会看到 选择a . columnn1, A.column2, ...., B. columnn1, B.column2 FROM A JOIN

但它不是免费的

对此没有SQL标准。

然而,通过代码生成(在表创建或修改或运行时按需生成),你可以很容易地做到这一点:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[stackoverflow_329931_a](
    [id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
    [col2] [nchar](10) NULL,
    [col3] [nchar](10) NULL,
    [col4] [nchar](10) NULL,
 CONSTRAINT [PK_stackoverflow_329931_a] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED 
(
    [id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[stackoverflow_329931_b](
    [id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
    [col2] [nchar](10) NULL,
    [col3] [nchar](10) NULL,
    [col4] [nchar](10) NULL,
 CONSTRAINT [PK_stackoverflow_329931_b] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED 
(
    [id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]

DECLARE @table1_name AS varchar(255)
DECLARE @table1_prefix AS varchar(255)
DECLARE @table2_name AS varchar(255)
DECLARE @table2_prefix AS varchar(255)
DECLARE @join_condition AS varchar(255)
SET @table1_name = 'stackoverflow_329931_a'
SET @table1_prefix = 'a_'
SET @table2_name = 'stackoverflow_329931_b'
SET @table2_prefix = 'b_'
SET @join_condition = 'a.[id] = b.[id]'

DECLARE @CRLF AS varchar(2)
SET @CRLF = CHAR(13) + CHAR(10)

DECLARE @a_columnlist AS varchar(MAX)
DECLARE @b_columnlist AS varchar(MAX)
DECLARE @sql AS varchar(MAX)

SELECT @a_columnlist = COALESCE(@a_columnlist + @CRLF + ',', '') + 'a.[' + COLUMN_NAME + '] AS [' + @table1_prefix + COLUMN_NAME + ']'
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_NAME = @table1_name
ORDER BY ORDINAL_POSITION

SELECT @b_columnlist = COALESCE(@b_columnlist + @CRLF + ',', '') + 'b.[' + COLUMN_NAME + '] AS [' + @table2_prefix + COLUMN_NAME + ']'
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_NAME = @table2_name
ORDER BY ORDINAL_POSITION

SET @sql = 'SELECT ' + @a_columnlist + '
,' + @b_columnlist + '
FROM [' + @table1_name + '] AS a
INNER JOIN [' + @table2_name + '] AS b
ON (' + @join_condition + ')'

PRINT @sql
-- EXEC (@sql)

我根据答案实现了一个解决方案,建议在节点中使用虚拟或哨兵列。你可以通过生成SQL来使用它:

select 
    s.*
  , '' as _prefix__creator_
  , u.*
  , '' as _prefix__speaker_
  , p.*
from statements s 
  left join users u on s.creator_user_id = u.user_id
  left join persons p on s.speaker_person_id = p.person_id

然后对从数据库驱动程序返回的行进行后处理,比如addPrefixes(row)。

实现(基于我的驱动程序返回的字段/行,但应该很容易为其他DB驱动程序更改):

const PREFIX_INDICATOR = '_prefix__'
const STOP_PREFIX_INDICATOR = '_stop_prefix'

/** Adds a <prefix> to all properties that follow a property with the name: PREFIX_INDICATOR<prefix> */
function addPrefixes(fields, row) {
  let prefix = null
  for (const field of fields) {
    const key = field.name
    if (key.startsWith(PREFIX_INDICATOR)) {
      if (row[key] !== '') {
        throw new Error(`PREFIX_INDICATOR ${PREFIX_INDICATOR} must not appear with a value, but had value: ${row[key]}`)
      }
      prefix = key.substr(PREFIX_INDICATOR.length)
      delete row[key]
    } else if (key === STOP_PREFIX_INDICATOR) {
      if (row[key] !== '') {
        throw new Error(`STOP_PREFIX_INDICATOR ${STOP_PREFIX_INDICATOR} must not appear with a value, but had value: ${row[key]}`)
      }
      prefix = null
      delete row[key]
    } else if (prefix) {
      const prefixedKey = prefix + key
      row[prefixedKey] = row[key]
      delete row[key]
    }
  }
  return row
}

测试:

const {
  addPrefixes,
  PREFIX_INDICATOR,
  STOP_PREFIX_INDICATOR,
} = require('./BaseDao')

describe('addPrefixes', () => {
  test('adds prefixes', () => {
    const fields = [
      {name: 'id'},
      {name: PREFIX_INDICATOR + 'my_prefix_'},
      {name: 'foo'},
      {name: STOP_PREFIX_INDICATOR},
      {name: 'baz'},
    ]
    const row = {
      id: 1,
      [PREFIX_INDICATOR + 'my_prefix_']: '',
      foo: 'bar',
      [STOP_PREFIX_INDICATOR]: '',
      baz: 'spaz'
    }
    const expected = {
      id: 1,
      my_prefix_foo: 'bar',
      baz: 'spaz',
    }
    expect(addPrefixes(fields, row)).toEqual(expected)
  })
})

问题的答案似乎是否定的,但是可以使用的一种方法是分配一个虚拟列来分隔每个新表。如果使用Python或PHP等脚本语言对列列表的结果集进行循环,那么这种方法尤其有效。

SELECT '' as table1_dummy, table1.*, '' as table2_dummy, table2.*, '' as table3_dummy, table3.* FROM table1
JOIN table2 ON table2.table1id = table1.id
JOIN table3 ON table3.table1id = table1.id

我知道这并不能完全回答您的问题,但是如果您是一名程序员,这是分离具有重复列名的表的好方法。