在我看来，内建数组对于堆栈来说是很好的。如果你想在TypeScript中使用Queue，这里有一个实现

/**
 * A Typescript implementation of a queue.
 */
export default class Queue {

  private queue = [];
  private offset = 0;

  constructor(array = []) {
    // Init the queue using the contents of the array
    for (const item of array) {
      this.enqueue(item);
    }
  }

  /**
   * @returns {number} the length of the queue.
   */
  public getLength(): number {
    return (this.queue.length - this.offset);
  }

  /**
   * @returns {boolean} true if the queue is empty, and false otherwise.
   */
  public isEmpty(): boolean {
    return (this.queue.length === 0);
  }

  /**
   * Enqueues the specified item.
   *
   * @param item - the item to enqueue
   */
  public enqueue(item) {
    this.queue.push(item);
  }

  /**
   *  Dequeues an item and returns it. If the queue is empty, the value
   * {@code null} is returned.
   *
   * @returns {any}
   */
  public dequeue(): any {
    // if the queue is empty, return immediately
    if (this.queue.length === 0) {
      return null;
    }

    // store the item at the front of the queue
    const item = this.queue[this.offset];

    // increment the offset and remove the free space if necessary
    if (++this.offset * 2 >= this.queue.length) {
      this.queue = this.queue.slice(this.offset);
      this.offset = 0;
    }

    // return the dequeued item
    return item;
  };

  /**
   * Returns the item at the front of the queue (without dequeuing it).
   * If the queue is empty then {@code null} is returned.
   *
   * @returns {any}
   */
  public peek(): any {
    return (this.queue.length > 0 ? this.queue[this.offset] : null);
  }

}

这里有一个笑话测试

it('Queue', () => {
  const queue = new Queue();
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(0);
  expect(queue.peek()).toBeNull();
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBeNull();

  queue.enqueue(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);
  queue.enqueue(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);
  queue.enqueue(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(3);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(0);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBeNull();
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBeNull();
});

希望有人觉得这有用，

欢呼,

Stu

或者可以使用两个数组来实现队列数据结构。

var temp_stack = new Array();
var stack = new Array();

temp_stack.push(1);
temp_stack.push(2);
temp_stack.push(3);

如果我现在弹出元素，那么输出将是3 2 1。 但我们想先进先出结构，所以你可以做以下。

stack.push(temp_stack.pop());
stack.push(temp_stack.pop());
stack.push(temp_stack.pop());

stack.pop(); //Pop out 1
stack.pop(); //Pop out 2
stack.pop(); //Pop out 3

As many have said: native array using push and pop is fine for a stack, but using shift for taking elements from a queue means that the remaining elements need to move, which is potentially slow. The idea of using two stacks to make a queue in kevinyu's answer is a nice idea to fix it, and of course that can be done with native-array-stacks as well. (Edit: there was actually already an answer by Yuki-Dreamer that does this, albeit less compactly. I didn't notice it until now because it was unfairly downvoted.)

下面是一个使用ES5/ES6特性的紧凑实现，它使队列对象的行为尽可能接近本机的push/shift变体，除了每次操作花费O(1)平摊时间:

const queue = () => {
    const a = [], b = [];
    return {
        push: (...elts) => a.push(...elts),
        shift: () => {
            if (b.length === 0) {
                while (a.length > 0) { b.push(a.pop()) }
            }
            return b.pop();
        },
        get length() { return a.length + b.length }
    }
}

现在你可以做:

const q = queue();
q.push(8);
q.push(9);
q.push(10);
console.log(q.length);          // outputs 3
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 8
q.push(11);
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 9
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 10
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 11
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs undefined

队列实现对长度使用getter语法，使其看起来像一个属性，并对push使用rest参数语法，以允许一次推送多个内容。如果你不想这样做，你可以用push: elt => a.push(elt)，替换第4行。(但是请注意，你不能用push: a.push替换它，就像我自己第一次尝试的那样，结果非常奇怪:这是因为它导致本机push方法被调用，并设置为队列对象。)

你可以基于这个概念使用你自己的自定义类，这里是你可以用来做这些事情的代码片段

/*
*   Stack implementation in JavaScript
*/



function Stack() {
  this.top = null;
  this.count = 0;

  this.getCount = function() {
    return this.count;
  }

  this.getTop = function() {
    return this.top;
  }

  this.push = function(data) {
    var node = {
      data: data,
      next: null
    }

    node.next = this.top;
    this.top = node;

    this.count++;
  }

  this.peek = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      return this.top.data;
    }
  }

  this.pop = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      var out = this.top;
      this.top = this.top.next;
      if (this.count > 0) {
        this.count--;
      }

      return out.data;
    }
  }

  this.displayAll = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      var arr = new Array();

      var current = this.top;
      //console.log(current);
      for (var i = 0; i < this.count; i++) {
        arr[i] = current.data;
        current = current.next;
      }

      return arr;
    }
  }
}

要检查这一点，请使用控制台，并逐一尝试这些行。

>> var st = new Stack();

>> st.push("BP");

>> st.push("NK");

>> st.getTop();

>> st.getCount();

>> st.displayAll();

>> st.pop();

>> st.displayAll();

>> st.getTop();

>> st.peek();

使用两个堆栈构造一个队列。

O(1)用于入队和出队操作。

class Queue {
  constructor() {
    this.s1 = []; // in
    this.s2 = []; // out
  }

  enqueue(val) {
    this.s1.push(val);
  }

  dequeue() {
    if (this.s2.length === 0) {
      this._move();
    }

    return this.s2.pop(); // return undefined if empty
  }

  _move() {
    while (this.s1.length) {
      this.s2.push(this.s1.pop());
    }
  }
}

Javascript数组shift()很慢，特别是当包含很多元素时。我知道两种方法来实现平摊O(1)复杂度的队列。

首先是使用循环缓冲区和表加倍。我以前实现过这个。你可以在这里看到我的源代码 https://github.com/kevyuu/rapid-queue

第二种方法是使用两个堆栈。这是带有两个堆栈的队列的代码

function createDoubleStackQueue() {
var that = {};
var pushContainer = [];
var popContainer = [];

function moveElementToPopContainer() {
    while (pushContainer.length !==0 ) {
        var element = pushContainer.pop();
        popContainer.push(element);
    }
}

that.push = function(element) {
    pushContainer.push(element);
};

that.shift = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    } else {
        return popContainer.pop();
    }
};

that.front = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    }
    return popContainer[popContainer.length - 1];
};

that.length = function() {
    return pushContainer.length + popContainer.length;
};

that.isEmpty = function() {
    return (pushContainer.length + popContainer.length) === 0;
};

return that;}

这是使用jsPerf进行的性能比较

CircularQueue.shift() vs Array.shift()

http://jsperf.com/rapidqueue-shift-vs-array-shift

正如你所看到的，大数据集的速度要快得多