你可以基于这个概念使用你自己的自定义类，这里是你可以用来做这些事情的代码片段

/*
*   Stack implementation in JavaScript
*/



function Stack() {
  this.top = null;
  this.count = 0;

  this.getCount = function() {
    return this.count;
  }

  this.getTop = function() {
    return this.top;
  }

  this.push = function(data) {
    var node = {
      data: data,
      next: null
    }

    node.next = this.top;
    this.top = node;

    this.count++;
  }

  this.peek = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      return this.top.data;
    }
  }

  this.pop = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      var out = this.top;
      this.top = this.top.next;
      if (this.count > 0) {
        this.count--;
      }

      return out.data;
    }
  }

  this.displayAll = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      var arr = new Array();

      var current = this.top;
      //console.log(current);
      for (var i = 0; i < this.count; i++) {
        arr[i] = current.data;
        current = current.next;
      }

      return arr;
    }
  }
}

要检查这一点，请使用控制台，并逐一尝试这些行。

>> var st = new Stack();

>> st.push("BP");

>> st.push("NK");

>> st.getTop();

>> st.getCount();

>> st.displayAll();

>> st.pop();

>> st.displayAll();

>> st.getTop();

>> st.peek();

使用两个堆栈构造一个队列。

O(1)用于入队和出队操作。

class Queue {
  constructor() {
    this.s1 = []; // in
    this.s2 = []; // out
  }

  enqueue(val) {
    this.s1.push(val);
  }

  dequeue() {
    if (this.s2.length === 0) {
      this._move();
    }

    return this.s2.pop(); // return undefined if empty
  }

  _move() {
    while (this.s1.length) {
      this.s2.push(this.s1.pop());
    }
  }
}

Javascript数组shift()很慢，特别是当包含很多元素时。我知道两种方法来实现平摊O(1)复杂度的队列。

首先是使用循环缓冲区和表加倍。我以前实现过这个。你可以在这里看到我的源代码 https://github.com/kevyuu/rapid-queue

第二种方法是使用两个堆栈。这是带有两个堆栈的队列的代码

function createDoubleStackQueue() {
var that = {};
var pushContainer = [];
var popContainer = [];

function moveElementToPopContainer() {
    while (pushContainer.length !==0 ) {
        var element = pushContainer.pop();
        popContainer.push(element);
    }
}

that.push = function(element) {
    pushContainer.push(element);
};

that.shift = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    } else {
        return popContainer.pop();
    }
};

that.front = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    }
    return popContainer[popContainer.length - 1];
};

that.length = function() {
    return pushContainer.length + popContainer.length;
};

that.isEmpty = function() {
    return (pushContainer.length + popContainer.length) === 0;
};

return that;}

这是使用jsPerf进行的性能比较

CircularQueue.shift() vs Array.shift()

http://jsperf.com/rapidqueue-shift-vs-array-shift

正如你所看到的，大数据集的速度要快得多

你可以基于这个概念使用你自己的自定义类，这里是你可以用来做这些事情的代码片段

/*
*   Stack implementation in JavaScript
*/



function Stack() {
  this.top = null;
  this.count = 0;

  this.getCount = function() {
    return this.count;
  }

  this.getTop = function() {
    return this.top;
  }

  this.push = function(data) {
    var node = {
      data: data,
      next: null
    }

    node.next = this.top;
    this.top = node;

    this.count++;
  }

  this.peek = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      return this.top.data;
    }
  }

  this.pop = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      var out = this.top;
      this.top = this.top.next;
      if (this.count > 0) {
        this.count--;
      }

      return out.data;
    }
  }

  this.displayAll = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      var arr = new Array();

      var current = this.top;
      //console.log(current);
      for (var i = 0; i < this.count; i++) {
        arr[i] = current.data;
        current = current.next;
      }

      return arr;
    }
  }
}

要检查这一点，请使用控制台，并逐一尝试这些行。

>> var st = new Stack();

>> st.push("BP");

>> st.push("NK");

>> st.getTop();

>> st.getCount();

>> st.displayAll();

>> st.pop();

>> st.displayAll();

>> st.getTop();

>> st.peek();

下面是一个队列的链表版本，它也包括最后一个节点，这是@perkins建议的，也是最合适的。

// QUEUE Object Definition

var Queue = function() {
  this.first = null;
  this.last = null;
  this.size = 0;
};

var Node = function(data) {
  this.data = data;
  this.next = null;
};

Queue.prototype.enqueue = function(data) {
  var node = new Node(data);

  if (!this.first){ // for empty list first and last are the same
    this.first = node;
    this.last = node;
  } else { // otherwise we stick it on the end
    this.last.next=node;
    this.last=node;
  }

  this.size += 1;
  return node;
};

Queue.prototype.dequeue = function() {
  if (!this.first) //check for empty list
    return null;

  temp = this.first; // grab top of list
  if (this.first==this.last) {
    this.last=null;  // when we need to pop the last one
  }
  this.first = this.first.next; // move top of list down
  this.size -= 1;
  return temp;
};

如果你理解栈的push()和pop()函数，那么queue只是在相反的意义上进行这些操作之一。push()的对边是unshift()， pop()的对边是shift()。 然后:

//classic stack
var stack = [];
stack.push("first"); // push inserts at the end
stack.push("second");
stack.push("last");
stack.pop(); //pop takes the "last" element

//One way to implement queue is to insert elements in the oposite sense than a stack
var queue = [];
queue.unshift("first"); //unshift inserts at the beginning
queue.unshift("second");
queue.unshift("last");
queue.pop(); //"first"

//other way to do queues is to take the elements in the oposite sense than stack
var queue = [];
queue.push("first"); //push, as in the stack inserts at the end
queue.push("second");
queue.push("last");
queue.shift(); //but shift takes the "first" element