我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
我对Java比较陌生,经常发现需要对值进行Map<Key,Value>排序。
由于这些值不是唯一的,我发现自己将keySet转换为一个数组,并使用自定义比较器通过数组排序对该数组进行排序,该比较器根据与该键关联的值进行排序。
有没有更简单的方法?
当前回答
主要问题。如果您使用第一个答案(Google将您带到这里),请更改比较器以添加等号子句,否则无法按键从sorted_map中获取值:
public int compare(String a, String b) {
if (base.get(a) > base.get(b)) {
return 1;
} else if (base.get(a) < base.get(b)){
return -1;
}
return 0;
// returning 0 would merge keys
}
其他回答
我们只需像这样对地图进行排序
Map<String, String> unsortedMap = new HashMap<String, String>();
unsortedMap.put("E", "E Val");
unsortedMap.put("F", "F Val");
unsortedMap.put("H", "H Val");
unsortedMap.put("B", "B Val");
unsortedMap.put("C", "C Val");
unsortedMap.put("A", "A Val");
unsortedMap.put("G", "G Val");
unsortedMap.put("D", "D Val");
Map<String, String> sortedMap = new TreeMap<String, String>(unsortedMap);
System.out.println("\nAfter sorting..");
for (Map.Entry <String, String> mapEntry : sortedMap.entrySet()) {
System.out.println(mapEntry.getKey() + " \t" + mapEntry.getValue());
这个问题已经有了很多答案,但没有一个能为我提供我想要的,一个返回按关联值排序的键和条目的映射实现,并在映射中修改键和值时维护这个属性。另外两个问题对此提出了具体要求。
我编写了一个通用友好的示例来解决这个用例。此实现不遵守Map接口的所有约定,例如反映原始对象中keySet()和entrySet()返回的集合中的值更改和删除。我觉得这样的解决方案太大,无法包含在堆栈溢出的答案中。如果我成功地创建了一个更完整的实现,也许我会将其发布到Github,然后在这个答案的更新版本中链接到它。
import java.util.*;
/**
* A map where {@link #keySet()} and {@link #entrySet()} return sets ordered
* by associated values based on the the comparator provided at construction
* time. The order of two or more keys with identical values is not defined.
* <p>
* Several contracts of the Map interface are not satisfied by this minimal
* implementation.
*/
public class ValueSortedMap<K, V> extends HashMap<K, V> {
protected Map<V, Collection<K>> valueToKeysMap;
// uses natural order of value object, if any
public ValueSortedMap() {
this((Comparator<? super V>) null);
}
public ValueSortedMap(Comparator<? super V> valueComparator) {
this.valueToKeysMap = new TreeMap<V, Collection<K>>(valueComparator);
}
public boolean containsValue(Object o) {
return valueToKeysMap.containsKey(o);
}
public V put(K k, V v) {
V oldV = null;
if (containsKey(k)) {
oldV = get(k);
valueToKeysMap.get(oldV).remove(k);
}
super.put(k, v);
if (!valueToKeysMap.containsKey(v)) {
Collection<K> keys = new ArrayList<K>();
keys.add(k);
valueToKeysMap.put(v, keys);
} else {
valueToKeysMap.get(v).add(k);
}
return oldV;
}
public void putAll(Map<? extends K, ? extends V> m) {
for (Map.Entry<? extends K, ? extends V> e : m.entrySet())
put(e.getKey(), e.getValue());
}
public V remove(Object k) {
V oldV = null;
if (containsKey(k)) {
oldV = get(k);
super.remove(k);
valueToKeysMap.get(oldV).remove(k);
}
return oldV;
}
public void clear() {
super.clear();
valueToKeysMap.clear();
}
public Set<K> keySet() {
LinkedHashSet<K> ret = new LinkedHashSet<K>(size());
for (V v : valueToKeysMap.keySet()) {
Collection<K> keys = valueToKeysMap.get(v);
ret.addAll(keys);
}
return ret;
}
public Set<Map.Entry<K, V>> entrySet() {
LinkedHashSet<Map.Entry<K, V>> ret = new LinkedHashSet<Map.Entry<K, V>>(size());
for (Collection<K> keys : valueToKeysMap.values()) {
for (final K k : keys) {
final V v = get(k);
ret.add(new Map.Entry<K,V>() {
public K getKey() {
return k;
}
public V getValue() {
return v;
}
public V setValue(V v) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
});
}
}
return ret;
}
}
最佳方法
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
public class OrderByValue {
public static void main(String a[]){
Map<String, Integer> map = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
map.put("java", 20);
map.put("C++", 45);
map.put("Unix", 67);
map.put("MAC", 26);
map.put("Why this kolavari", 93);
Set<Entry<String, Integer>> set = map.entrySet();
List<Entry<String, Integer>> list = new ArrayList<Entry<String, Integer>>(set);
Collections.sort( list, new Comparator<Map.Entry<String, Integer>>()
{
public int compare( Map.Entry<String, Integer> o1, Map.Entry<String, Integer> o2 )
{
return (o1.getValue()).compareTo( o2.getValue() );//Ascending order
//return (o2.getValue()).compareTo( o1.getValue() );//Descending order
}
} );
for(Map.Entry<String, Integer> entry:list){
System.out.println(entry.getKey()+" ==== "+entry.getValue());
}
}}
输出
java ==== 20
MAC ==== 26
C++ ==== 45
Unix ==== 67
Why this kolavari ==== 93
Geeks For Geeks对HashMap按值排序
Input : Key = Math, Value = 98
Key = Data Structure, Value = 85
Key = Database, Value = 91
Key = Java, Value = 95
Key = Operating System, Value = 79
Key = Networking, Value = 80
Output : Key = Operating System, Value = 79
Key = Networking, Value = 80
Key = Data Structure, Value = 85
Key = Database, Value = 91
Key = Java, Value = 95
Key = Math, Value = 98
Solution: The idea is to store the entry set in a list and sort the list on the basis of values. Then fetch values and keys from the list and put them in a new hashmap. Thus, a new hashmap is sorted according to values.
Below is the implementation of the above idea:
// Java program to sort hashmap by values
import java.util.*;
import java.lang.*;
public class GFG {
// function to sort hashmap by values
public static HashMap<String, Integer> sortByValue(HashMap<String, Integer> hm)
{
// Create a list from elements of HashMap
List<Map.Entry<String, Integer> > list =
new LinkedList<Map.Entry<String, Integer> >(hm.entrySet());
// Sort the list
Collections.sort(list, new Comparator<Map.Entry<String, Integer> >() {
public int compare(Map.Entry<String, Integer> o1,
Map.Entry<String, Integer> o2)
{
return (o1.getValue()).compareTo(o2.getValue());
}
});
// put data from sorted list to hashmap
HashMap<String, Integer> temp = new LinkedHashMap<String, Integer>();
for (Map.Entry<String, Integer> aa : list) {
temp.put(aa.getKey(), aa.getValue());
}
return temp;
}
// Driver Code
public static void main(String[] args)
{
HashMap<String, Integer> hm = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
// enter data into hashmap
hm.put("Math", 98);
hm.put("Data Structure", 85);
hm.put("Database", 91);
hm.put("Java", 95);
hm.put("Operating System", 79);
hm.put("Networking", 80);
Map<String, Integer> hm1 = sortByValue(hm);
// print the sorted hashmap
for (Map.Entry<String, Integer> en : hm1.entrySet()) {
System.out.println("Key = " + en.getKey() +
", Value = " + en.getValue());
}
}
}
Output
Key = Operating System, Value = 79
Key = Networking, Value = 80
Key = Data Structure, Value = 85
Key = Database, Value = 91
Key = Java, Value = 95
Key = Math, Value = 98
我建议使用Arrays.sort,而不是像某些人那样使用Collections.ort。实际上Collections.ort的作用是这样的:
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> void sort(List<T> list) {
Object[] a = list.toArray();
Arrays.sort(a);
ListIterator<T> i = list.listIterator();
for (int j=0; j<a.length; j++) {
i.next();
i.set((T)a[j]);
}
}
它只调用列表上的array,然后使用Arrays.sort。这样,所有映射条目将被复制三次:一次从映射复制到临时列表(无论是LinkedList还是ArrayList),然后复制到临时数组,最后复制到新映射。
我的解决方案省略了这一步,因为它不会创建不必要的LinkedList。以下是代码,通用友好,性能最佳:
public static <K, V extends Comparable<? super V>> Map<K, V> sortByValue(Map<K, V> map)
{
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Map.Entry<K,V>[] array = map.entrySet().toArray(new Map.Entry[map.size()]);
Arrays.sort(array, new Comparator<Map.Entry<K, V>>()
{
public int compare(Map.Entry<K, V> e1, Map.Entry<K, V> e2)
{
return e1.getValue().compareTo(e2.getValue());
}
});
Map<K, V> result = new LinkedHashMap<K, V>();
for (Map.Entry<K, V> entry : array)
result.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
return result;
}