在Hibernate Validator 4.x中是否有跨字段验证的实现(或第三方实现)?如果不是，实现跨字段验证器的最干净的方法是什么?
例如，如何使用API来验证两个bean属性是否相等(例如验证密码字段与密码验证字段是否匹配)。
在注释中，我期望如下内容:
public class MyBean {
@Size(min=6, max=50)
private String pass;
@Equals(property="pass")
private String passVerify;
}
当前回答
我尝试了Alberthoven的例子(hibernate-validator 4.0.2.GA)，我得到了一个ValidationException:“带注释的方法必须遵循JavaBeans命名约定。Match()没有。”。在我将方法从“match”重命名为“isValid”后，它就工作了。
public class Password {
private String password;
private String retypedPassword;
public Password(String password, String retypedPassword) {
super();
this.password = password;
this.retypedPassword = retypedPassword;
}
@AssertTrue(message="password should match retyped password")
private boolean isValid(){
if (password == null) {
return retypedPassword == null;
} else {
return password.equals(retypedPassword);
}
}
public String getPassword() {
return password;
}
public String getRetypedPassword() {
return retypedPassword;
}
}
其他回答
如果您正在使用Spring框架，那么您可以使用Spring表达式语言(SpEL)。我写了一个小库，提供了基于SpEL的JSR-303验证器——它使得跨领域验证变得轻而易举!看看https://github.com/jirutka/validator-spring。
这将验证密码字段的长度和相等性。
@SpELAssert(value = "pass.equals(passVerify)",
message = "{validator.passwords_not_same}")
public class MyBean {
@Size(min = 6, max = 50)
private String pass;
private String passVerify;
}
您还可以轻松地进行修改，仅当密码字段不为空时才验证密码字段。
@SpELAssert(value = "pass.equals(passVerify)",
applyIf = "pass || passVerify",
message = "{validator.passwords_not_same}")
public class MyBean {
@Size(min = 6, max = 50)
private String pass;
private String passVerify;
}
非常好的解决方案，布拉德豪斯。是否有办法将@Matches注释应用到多个字段?
编辑: 下面是我想出的解决方案来回答这个问题，我修改了约束以接受数组而不是单个值:
@Matches(fields={"password", "email"}, verifyFields={"confirmPassword", "confirmEmail"})
public class UserRegistrationForm {
@NotNull
@Size(min=8, max=25)
private String password;
@NotNull
@Size(min=8, max=25)
private String confirmPassword;
@NotNull
@Email
private String email;
@NotNull
@Email
private String confirmEmail;
}
注释的代码:
package springapp.util.constraints;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.*;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.*;
import java.lang.annotation.Documented;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
import javax.validation.Constraint;
import javax.validation.Payload;
@Target({TYPE, ANNOTATION_TYPE})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Constraint(validatedBy = MatchesValidator.class)
@Documented
public @interface Matches {
String message() default "{springapp.util.constraints.matches}";
Class<?>[] groups() default {};
Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
String[] fields();
String[] verifyFields();
}
以及实现:
package springapp.util.constraints;
import javax.validation.ConstraintValidator;
import javax.validation.ConstraintValidatorContext;
import org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanUtils;
public class MatchesValidator implements ConstraintValidator<Matches, Object> {
private String[] fields;
private String[] verifyFields;
public void initialize(Matches constraintAnnotation) {
fields = constraintAnnotation.fields();
verifyFields = constraintAnnotation.verifyFields();
}
public boolean isValid(Object value, ConstraintValidatorContext context) {
boolean matches = true;
for (int i=0; i<fields.length; i++) {
Object fieldObj, verifyFieldObj;
try {
fieldObj = BeanUtils.getProperty(value, fields[i]);
verifyFieldObj = BeanUtils.getProperty(value, verifyFields[i]);
} catch (Exception e) {
//ignore
continue;
}
boolean neitherSet = (fieldObj == null) && (verifyFieldObj == null);
if (neitherSet) {
continue;
}
boolean tempMatches = (fieldObj != null) && fieldObj.equals(verifyFieldObj);
if (!tempMatches) {
addConstraintViolation(context, fields[i]+ " fields do not match", verifyFields[i]);
}
matches = matches?tempMatches:matches;
}
return matches;
}
private void addConstraintViolation(ConstraintValidatorContext context, String message, String field) {
context.disableDefaultConstraintViolation();
context.buildConstraintViolationWithTemplate(message).addNode(field).addConstraintViolation();
}
}
你们太棒了。真是惊人的想法。我最喜欢阿尔伯托芬和麦金的，所以我决定把他们的想法结合起来。并开发一些通用的解决方案，以满足所有情况。以下是我提出的解决方案。
@Documented
@Constraint(validatedBy = NotFalseValidator.class)
@Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.FIELD,ElementType.TYPE})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface NotFalse {
String message() default "NotFalse";
String[] messages();
String[] properties();
String[] verifiers();
Class<?>[] groups() default {};
Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
}
public class NotFalseValidator implements ConstraintValidator<NotFalse, Object> {
private String[] properties;
private String[] messages;
private String[] verifiers;
@Override
public void initialize(NotFalse flag) {
properties = flag.properties();
messages = flag.messages();
verifiers = flag.verifiers();
}
@Override
public boolean isValid(Object bean, ConstraintValidatorContext cxt) {
if(bean == null) {
return true;
}
boolean valid = true;
BeanWrapper beanWrapper = PropertyAccessorFactory.forBeanPropertyAccess(bean);
for(int i = 0; i< properties.length; i++) {
Boolean verified = (Boolean) beanWrapper.getPropertyValue(verifiers[i]);
valid &= isValidProperty(verified,messages[i],properties[i],cxt);
}
return valid;
}
boolean isValidProperty(Boolean flag,String message, String property, ConstraintValidatorContext cxt) {
if(flag == null || flag) {
return true;
} else {
cxt.disableDefaultConstraintViolation();
cxt.buildConstraintViolationWithTemplate(message)
.addPropertyNode(property)
.addConstraintViolation();
return false;
}
}
}
@NotFalse(
messages = {"End Date Before Start Date" , "Start Date Before End Date" } ,
properties={"endDateTime" , "startDateTime"},
verifiers = {"validDateRange" , "validDateRange"})
public class SyncSessionDTO implements ControllableNode {
@NotEmpty @NotPastDate
private Date startDateTime;
@NotEmpty
private Date endDateTime;
public Date getStartDateTime() {
return startDateTime;
}
public void setStartDateTime(Date startDateTime) {
this.startDateTime = startDateTime;
}
public Date getEndDateTime() {
return endDateTime;
}
public void setEndDateTime(Date endDateTime) {
this.endDateTime = endDateTime;
}
public Boolean getValidDateRange(){
if(startDateTime != null && endDateTime != null) {
return startDateTime.getTime() <= endDateTime.getTime();
}
return null;
}
}
我喜欢Jakub Jirutka使用Spring表达式语言的想法。如果您不想添加另一个库/依赖项(假设您已经使用了Spring)，下面是他的想法的简化实现。
约束:
@Constraint(validatedBy=ExpressionAssertValidator.class)
@Target({ElementType.TYPE})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface ExpressionAssert {
String message() default "expression must evaluate to true";
Class<?>[] groups() default {};
Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {};
String value();
}
验证器:
public class ExpressionAssertValidator implements ConstraintValidator<ExpressionAssert, Object> {
private Expression exp;
public void initialize(ExpressionAssert annotation) {
ExpressionParser parser = new SpelExpressionParser();
exp = parser.parseExpression(annotation.value());
}
public boolean isValid(Object value, ConstraintValidatorContext context) {
return exp.getValue(value, Boolean.class);
}
}
像这样应用:
@ExpressionAssert(value="pass == passVerify", message="passwords must be same")
public class MyBean {
@Size(min=6, max=50)
private String pass;
private String passVerify;
}
为什么不试试Oval: http://oval.sourceforge.net/呢
我看起来像它支持OGNL，所以也许你可以用更自然的方式来做
@Assert(expr = "_value ==_this.pass").
