背景:在接下来的一个月里，我将做三次关于LINQ的演讲，或者至少将LINQ包含在c#的上下文中。我想知道哪些话题值得花相当多的精力，这取决于人们可能很难理解哪些话题，或者他们可能有错误的印象。我不会具体讨论LINQ to SQL或实体框架，只是作为如何使用表达式树(通常是IQueryable)远程执行查询的示例。
那么，你发现LINQ有什么难的地方吗?在误解方面你看到了什么?例子可能是以下任何一个，但请不要限制自己!
c#编译器如何处理查询表达式 Lambda表达式 表达式树 扩展方法 匿名类型 这个IQueryable 延迟执行与立即执行 流与缓冲执行(例如，OrderBy被延迟但被缓冲) 隐式类型局部变量 读取复杂的泛型签名(例如Enumerable.Join)
当前回答
执行查询时var代表什么?
它是iQueryable, iSingleResult, iMultipleResult，还是根据实现改变。在c#中使用(似乎是)动态类型与标准静态类型之间存在一些猜测。
其他回答
编译查询
The fact that you can't chain IQueryable because they are method calls (while still nothing else but SQL translateable!) and that it is almost impossible to work around it is mindboggling and creates a huge violation of DRY. I need my IQueryable's for ad-hoc in which I don't have compiled queries (I only have compiled queries for the heavy scenarios), but in compiled queries I can't use them and instead need to write regular query syntax again. Now I'm doing the same subqueries in 2 places, need to remember to update both if something changes, and so forth. A nightmare.
哪个更快，内联Linq-to-Sql还是使用Tsql spprocs的Linq-to-Sql
．.． 是否有使用服务器端(Sproc)或客户端(内联Linq)查询更好的情况。
表达式<Func<T1, T2, T3，…>> and Func<T1, T2, T3，…>，没有给出第二个情况下性能下降的提示。
下面是代码示例，演示了我的意思:
[TestMethod]
public void QueryComplexityTest()
{
var users = _dataContext.Users;
Func<User, bool> funcSelector = q => q.UserName.StartsWith("Test");
Expression<Func<User, bool>> expressionSelector = q => q.UserName.StartsWith("Test");
// Returns IEnumerable, and do filtering of data on client-side
IQueryable<User> func = users.Where(funcSelector).AsQueryable();
// Returns IQuerible and do filtering of data on server side
// SELECT ... FROM [dbo].[User] AS [t0] WHERE [t0].[user_name] LIKE @p0
IQueryable<User> exp = users.Where(expressionSelector);
}
我发现“创建一个表达式树”很难。有很多事情困扰我，你可以用LINQ, LINQ到SQL和ADO。净。
Explain why Linq does not handle left outer join as simple as in sql syntax. See this articles: Implementing a Left Join with LINQ, How to: Perform Left Outer Joins (C# Programming Guide) I got so disappointed when I came across this obstacle that all my respect for the language vanished and I decedid that it was just something that quickly would fade away. No serious person would want to work with a syntax that lacks these battlefield proven primitives. If you could explain why these sort of set operation are not supported. I would become a better and more openminded person.
