我的情况很简单。在我的代码中,我有这样的代码:

dynamic myVariable = GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame();

//How to do this?
if (myVariable.MyProperty.Exists)   
//Do stuff

因此,基本上我的问题是如何检查(不抛出异常)某个属性在我的动态变量上是可用的。我可以使用GetType(),但我宁愿避免这样做,因为我并不真正需要知道对象的类型。我真正想知道的是是否有一个属性(或方法,如果这使工作更简单的话)可用。指针吗?


当前回答

下面是另一种方法:

using Newtonsoft.Json.Linq;

internal class DymanicTest
{
    public static string Json = @"{
            ""AED"": 3.672825,
            ""AFN"": 56.982875,
            ""ALL"": 110.252599,
            ""AMD"": 408.222002,
            ""ANG"": 1.78704,
            ""AOA"": 98.192249,
            ""ARS"": 8.44469
}";

    public static void Run()
    {
        dynamic dynamicObject = JObject.Parse(Json);

        foreach (JProperty variable in dynamicObject)
        {
            if (variable.Name == "AMD")
            {
                var value = variable.Value;
            }
        }
    }
}

其他回答

The two common solutions to this include making the call and catching the RuntimeBinderException, using reflection to check for the call, or serialising to a text format and parsing from there. The problem with exceptions is that they are very slow, because when one is constructed, the current call stack is serialised. Serialising to JSON or something analogous incurs a similar penalty. This leaves us with reflection but it only works if the underlying object is actually a POCO with real members on it. If it's a dynamic wrapper around a dictionary, a COM object, or an external web service, then reflection won't help.

另一种解决方案是使用IDynamicMetaObjectProvider获取DLR看到的成员名。在下面的例子中,我使用一个静态类(Dynamic)来测试Age字段并显示它。

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        dynamic x = new ExpandoObject();

        x.Name = "Damian Powell";
        x.Age = "21 (probably)";

        if (Dynamic.HasMember(x, "Age"))
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Age={0}", x.Age);
        }
    }
}

public static class Dynamic
{
    public static bool HasMember(object dynObj, string memberName)
    {
        return GetMemberNames(dynObj).Contains(memberName);
    }

    public static IEnumerable<string> GetMemberNames(object dynObj)
    {
        var metaObjProvider = dynObj as IDynamicMetaObjectProvider;

        if (null == metaObjProvider) throw new InvalidOperationException(
            "The supplied object must be a dynamic object " +
            "(i.e. it must implement IDynamicMetaObjectProvider)"
        );

        var metaObj = metaObjProvider.GetMetaObject(
            Expression.Constant(metaObjProvider)
        );

        var memberNames = metaObj.GetDynamicMemberNames();

        return memberNames;
    }
}

根据@karask的回答,你可以像这样将函数包装为一个helper:

public static bool HasProperty(ExpandoObject expandoObj,
                               string name)
{
    return ((IDictionary<string, object>)expandoObj).ContainsKey(name);
}

也许使用反射?

dynamic myVar = GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame();
Type typeOfDynamic = myVar.GetType();
bool exist = typeOfDynamic.GetProperties().Where(p => p.Name.Equals("PropertyName")).Any(); 

在我的例子中,我需要检查具有特定名称的方法是否存在,因此我使用了一个接口

var plugin = this.pluginFinder.GetPluginIfInstalled<IPlugin>(pluginName) as dynamic;
if (plugin != null && plugin is ICustomPluginAction)
{
    plugin.CustomPluginAction(action);
}

此外,接口可以包含的不仅仅是方法:

接口可以包含方法、属性、事件、索引器等等 这四种成员类型的组合。

来自:Interfaces (c#编程指南)

优雅,不需要陷阱异常或发挥反射…

我在单元测试中遇到过类似的问题。

使用SharpTestsEx可以检查属性是否存在。我使用这个测试我的控制器,因为JSON对象是动态的,有人可以更改名称,而忘记在javascript中更改它或其他东西,所以在编写控制器时测试所有属性应该增加我的安全性。

例子:

dynamic testedObject = new ExpandoObject();
testedObject.MyName = "I am a testing object";

现在,使用SharTestsEx:

Executing.This(delegate {var unused = testedObject.MyName; }).Should().NotThrow();
Executing.This(delegate {var unused = testedObject.NotExistingProperty; }).Should().Throw();

使用这个,我测试所有现有的属性使用“Should(). notthrow()”。

这可能离题了,但对某人来说可能有用。