我试图用PHP创建一个枚举…这是非常有限的，因为它不支持对象作为枚举值，但仍然有点有用…

class ProtocolsEnum {

    const HTTP = '1';
    const HTTPS = '2';
    const FTP = '3';

    /**
     * Retrieve an enum value
     * @param string $name
     * @return string
     */
    public static function getValueByName($name) {
        return constant('self::'. $name);
    } 

    /**
     * Retrieve an enum key name
     * @param string $code
     * @return string
     */
    public static function getNameByValue($code) {
        foreach(get_class_constants() as $key => $val) {
            if($val == $code) {
                return $key;
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Retrieve associate array of all constants (used for creating droplist options)
     * @return multitype:
     */
    public static function toArray() {      
        return array_flip(self::get_class_constants());
    }

    private static function get_class_constants()
    {
        $reflect = new ReflectionClass(__CLASS__);
        return $reflect->getConstants();
    }
}

我知道这是一个旧线程，然而没有一个我所见过的解决方法真的看起来像枚举，因为几乎所有的解决方法都需要你手动分配值给枚举项，或者它需要你传递一个枚举键数组到一个函数。所以我创造了自己的解决方案。

要使用我的解决方案创建枚举类，可以简单地扩展下面的enum类，创建一堆静态变量(不需要初始化它们)，并在枚举类定义的下面调用yourEnumClass::init()。

edit: This only works in php >= 5.3, but it can probably be modified to work in older versions as well /** * A base class for enums. * * This class can be used as a base class for enums. * It can be used to create regular enums (incremental indices), but it can also be used to create binary flag values. * To create an enum class you can simply extend this class, and make a call to <yourEnumClass>::init() before you use the enum. * Preferably this call is made directly after the class declaration. * Example usages: * DaysOfTheWeek.class.php * abstract class DaysOfTheWeek extends Enum{ * static $MONDAY = 1; * static $TUESDAY; * static $WEDNESDAY; * static $THURSDAY; * static $FRIDAY; * static $SATURDAY; * static $SUNDAY; * } * DaysOfTheWeek::init(); * * example.php * require_once("DaysOfTheWeek.class.php"); * $today = date('N'); * if ($today == DaysOfTheWeek::$SUNDAY || $today == DaysOfTheWeek::$SATURDAY) * echo "It's weekend!"; * * Flags.class.php * abstract class Flags extends Enum{ * static $FLAG_1; * static $FLAG_2; * static $FLAG_3; * } * Flags::init(Enum::$BINARY_FLAG); * * example2.php * require_once("Flags.class.php"); * $flags = Flags::$FLAG_1 | Flags::$FLAG_2; * if ($flags & Flags::$FLAG_1) * echo "Flag_1 is set"; * * @author Tiddo Langerak */ abstract class Enum{ static $BINARY_FLAG = 1; /** * This function must be called to initialize the enumeration! * * @param bool $flags If the USE_BINARY flag is provided, the enum values will be binary flag values. Default: no flags set. */ public static function init($flags = 0){ //First, we want to get a list of all static properties of the enum class. We'll use the ReflectionClass for this. $enum = get_called_class(); $ref = new ReflectionClass($enum); $items = $ref->getStaticProperties(); //Now we can start assigning values to the items. if ($flags & self::$BINARY_FLAG){ //If we want binary flag values, our first value should be 1. $value = 1; //Now we can set the values for all items. foreach ($items as $key=>$item){ if (!isset($item)){ //If no value is set manually, we should set it. $enum::$$key = $value; //And we need to calculate the new value $value *= 2; } else { //If there was already a value set, we will continue starting from that value, but only if that was a valid binary flag value. //Otherwise, we will just skip this item. if ($key != 0 && ($key & ($key - 1) == 0)) $value = 2 * $item; } } } else { //If we want to use regular indices, we'll start with index 0. $value = 0; //Now we can set the values for all items. foreach ($items as $key=>$item){ if (!isset($item)){ //If no value is set manually, we should set it, and increment the value for the next item. $enum::$$key = $value; $value++; } else { //If a value was already set, we'll continue from that value. $value = $item+1; } } } } }

我已经在这里评论了一些其他的答案，所以我想我也会发表意见。 最后，由于PHP不支持类型化枚举，您可以选择以下两种方式之一:删除类型化枚举，或者接受它们极难有效删除的事实。

我更倾向于接受事实，而不是使用其他答案以某种方式使用的const方法:

abstract class Enum
{

    const NONE = null;

    final private function __construct()
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException(); // 
    }

    final private function __clone()
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException();
    }

    final public static function toArray()
    {
        return (new ReflectionClass(static::class))->getConstants();
    }

    final public static function isValid($value)
    {
        return in_array($value, static::toArray());
    }

}

枚举示例:

final class ResponseStatusCode extends Enum
{

    const OK                         = 200;
    const CREATED                    = 201;
    const ACCEPTED                   = 202;
    // ...
    const SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE        = 503;
    const GATEWAY_TIME_OUT           = 504;
    const HTTP_VERSION_NOT_SUPPORTED = 505;

}

使用Enum作为所有其他枚举扩展的基类，允许使用诸如toArray、isValid等辅助方法。对我来说，类型化的枚举(以及管理它们的实例)最终太混乱了。

假设

如果存在一个__getStatic魔法方法(最好还有一个__equals魔法方法)，那么大部分问题都可以通过一种多吨模式来缓解。

(以下是假设;它不会起作用，尽管也许有一天它会)

final class TestEnum
{

    private static $_values = [
        'FOO' => 1,
        'BAR' => 2,
        'QUX' => 3,
    ];
    private static $_instances = [];

    public static function __getStatic($name)
    {
        if (isset(static::$_values[$name]))
        {
            if (empty(static::$_instances[$name]))
            {
                static::$_instances[$name] = new static($name);
            }
            return static::$_instances[$name];
        }
        throw new Exception(sprintf('Invalid enumeration value, "%s"', $name));
    }

    private $_value;

    public function __construct($name)
    {
        $this->_value = static::$_values[$name];
    }

    public function __equals($object)
    {
        if ($object instanceof static)
        {
            return $object->_value === $this->_value;
        }
        return $object === $this->_value;
    }

}

$foo = TestEnum::$FOO; // object(TestEnum)#1 (1) {
                       //   ["_value":"TestEnum":private]=>
                       //   int(1)
                       // }

$zap = TestEnum::$ZAP; // Uncaught exception 'Exception' with message
                       // 'Invalid enumeration member, "ZAP"'

$qux = TestEnum::$QUX;
TestEnum::$QUX == $qux; // true
'hello world!' == $qux; // false

我使用接口而不是类:

interface DaysOfWeek
{
    const Sunday = 0;
    const Monday = 1;
    // etc.
}

var $today = DaysOfWeek::Sunday;

公认的答案是要走的路，实际上这是我所做的简单。枚举提供了大多数优点(可读、快速等)。然而，这里缺少一个概念:类型安全。在大多数语言中，枚举也用于限制允许的值。下面是一个通过使用私有构造函数、静态实例化方法和类型检查来获得类型安全的例子:

class DaysOfWeek{
 const Sunday = 0;
 const Monday = 1;
 // etc.

 private $intVal;
 private function __construct($intVal){
   $this->intVal = $intVal;
 }

 //static instantiation methods
 public static function MONDAY(){
   return new self(self::Monday);
 }
 //etc.
}

//function using type checking
function printDayOfWeek(DaysOfWeek $d){ //compiler can now use type checking
  // to something with $d...
}

//calling the function is safe!
printDayOfWeek(DaysOfWeek::MONDAY());

我们甚至可以更进一步:在DaysOfWeek类中使用常量可能会导致误用:例如，人们可能会这样错误地使用它:

printDayOfWeek(DaysOfWeek::Monday); //triggers a compiler error.

这是错误的(调用整数常量)。我们可以使用私有静态变量而不是常量来防止这种情况:

class DaysOfWeeks{

  private static $monday = 1;
  //etc.

  private $intVal;
  //private constructor
  private function __construct($intVal){
    $this->intVal = $intVal;
  }

  //public instantiation methods
  public static function MONDAY(){
    return new self(self::$monday);
  }
  //etc.


  //convert an instance to its integer value
  public function intVal(){
    return $this->intVal;
  }

}

当然，不可能访问整数常量(这实际上是目的)。intVal方法允许将DaysOfWeek对象转换为其整数表示形式。

请注意，我们甚至可以进一步在实例化方法中实现缓存机制，以在广泛使用枚举的情况下节省内存…

希望这能有所帮助

好吧，对于一个简单的java，比如php中的enum，我使用:

class SomeTypeName {
    private static $enum = array(1 => "Read", 2 => "Write");

    public function toOrdinal($name) {
        return array_search($name, self::$enum);
    }

    public function toString($ordinal) {
        return self::$enum[$ordinal];
    }
}

我们称它为:

SomeTypeName::toOrdinal("Read");
SomeTypeName::toString(1);

但我是PHP初学者，语法不好，所以这可能不是最好的方法。我尝试了一些类常量，使用反射从它的值中获得常量名，可能更整洁。