虽然linq的回答很有趣，但它也很重。我的方法有些不同：

var DataGrouper = (function() {
    var has = function(obj, target) {
        return _.any(obj, function(value) {
            return _.isEqual(value, target);
        });
    };

    var keys = function(data, names) {
        return _.reduce(data, function(memo, item) {
            var key = _.pick(item, names);
            if (!has(memo, key)) {
                memo.push(key);
            }
            return memo;
        }, []);
    };

    var group = function(data, names) {
        var stems = keys(data, names);
        return _.map(stems, function(stem) {
            return {
                key: stem,
                vals:_.map(_.where(data, stem), function(item) {
                    return _.omit(item, names);
                })
            };
        });
    };

    group.register = function(name, converter) {
        return group[name] = function(data, names) {
            return _.map(group(data, names), converter);
        };
    };

    return group;
}());

DataGrouper.register("sum", function(item) {
    return _.extend({}, item.key, {Value: _.reduce(item.vals, function(memo, node) {
        return memo + Number(node.Value);
    }, 0)});
});

您可以在JSBin上看到它的作用。

我在Undercore中没有看到任何东西可以做已经做的事情，尽管我可能会错过它。它与_.incontains非常相似，但使用_.isEqual而不是==进行比较。除此之外，其余部分都是针对具体问题的，尽管只是试图通用。

现在DataGrouper.sum（data，[“Phase”]）返回

[
    {Phase: "Phase 1", Value: 50},
    {Phase: "Phase 2", Value: 130}
]

DataGrouper.sum（data，[“Phase”，“Step”]）返回

[
    {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 1", Value: 15},
    {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 2", Value: 35},
    {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 1", Value: 55},
    {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 2", Value: 75}
]

但和在这里只是一个势函数。您可以根据需要注册其他人：

DataGrouper.register("max", function(item) {
    return _.extend({}, item.key, {Max: _.reduce(item.vals, function(memo, node) {
        return Math.max(memo, Number(node.Value));
    }, Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY)});
});

现在DataGrouper.max（data，[“Phase”，“Step”]）将返回

[
    {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 1", Max: 10},
    {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 2", Max: 20},
    {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 1", Max: 30},
    {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 2", Max: 40}
]

或者如果您注册了：

DataGrouper.register("tasks", function(item) {
    return _.extend({}, item.key, {Tasks: _.map(item.vals, function(item) {
      return item.Task + " (" + item.Value + ")";
    }).join(", ")});
});

然后调用DataGrouper.tasks（data，[“Phase”，“Step”]）将得到

[
    {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 1", Tasks: "Task 1 (5), Task 2 (10)"},
    {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 2", Tasks: "Task 1 (15), Task 2 (20)"},
    {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 1", Tasks: "Task 1 (25), Task 2 (30)"},
    {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 2", Tasks: "Task 1 (35), Task 2 (40)"}
]

DataGrouper本身是一个函数。可以用数据和要分组的财产列表来调用它。它返回一个数组，该数组的元素是具有两个财产的对象：key是分组财产的集合，vals是包含不在key中的其余财产的对象数组。例如，DataGrouper（data，[“Phase”，“Step”]）将产生：

[
    {
        "key": {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 1"},
        "vals": [
            {Task: "Task 1", Value: "5"},
            {Task: "Task 2", Value: "10"}
        ]
    },
    {
        "key": {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 2"},
        "vals": [
            {Task: "Task 1", Value: "15"}, 
            {Task: "Task 2", Value: "20"}
        ]
    },
    {
        "key": {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 1"},
        "vals": [
            {Task: "Task 1", Value: "25"},
            {Task: "Task 2", Value: "30"}
        ]
    },
    {
        "key": {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 2"},
        "vals": [
            {Task: "Task 1", Value: "35"}, 
            {Task: "Task 2", Value: "40"}
        ]
    }
]

DataGrouper.register接受一个函数并创建一个新函数，该函数接受初始数据和分组依据的财产。然后，这个新函数采用上述输出格式，并依次对每个输出格式运行函数，返回一个新数组。生成的函数根据您提供的名称存储为DataGrouper的属性，如果您只需要本地引用，也会返回。

这是很多解释。我希望代码相当简单！

Array.prototype.groupBy=函数（groupingKeyFn）{if（groupingKeyFn的类型！=='函数'）{throw new Error（“groupBy将函数作为唯一参数”）；}返回this。reduce（（result，item）=>{let key=groupingKeyFn（项）；if（！result[key]）result[key]=[]；result[key].push（项）；返回结果；}, {});}变量a=[｛type:“video”，名称：“a”｝，｛type:“image”，名称：“b”｝，｛type:“video”，名称：“c”｝，｛type:“blog”，名称：“d”｝，{type:“video”，名称：“e”}，]console.log（a.groupBy（（item）=>item.type））；<script src=“https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js“></script>

function groupBy(array, groupBy){
        return array.reduce((acc,curr,index,array) => {
           var  idx = curr[groupBy]; 
              if(!acc[idx]){
                    acc[idx] = array.filter(item => item[groupBy] === idx)
              } 
            return  acc; 

        },{})
    }

// call
groupBy(items,'Step')

data = [{id:1, name:'BMW'}, {id:2, name:'AN'}, {id:3, name:'BMW'}, {id:1, name:'NNN'}]
key = 'id'//try by id or name
data.reduce((previous, current)=>{
    previous[current[key]] && previous[current[key]].length != 0 ? previous[current[key]].push(current) : previous[current[key]] = new Array(current)
    return previous;
}, {})

我对公认的答案进行了扩展，包括按多个财产分组，然后再加上，使其完全起作用，没有变异。观看演示https://stackblitz.com/edit/typescript-ezydzv

export interface Group {
  key: any;
  items: any[];
}

export interface GroupBy {
  keys: string[];
  thenby?: GroupBy;
}

export const groupBy = (array: any[], grouping: GroupBy): Group[] => {
  const keys = grouping.keys;
  const groups = array.reduce((groups, item) => {
    const group = groups.find(g => keys.every(key => item[key] === g.key[key]));
    const data = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(item)
      .filter(prop => !keys.find(key => key === prop))
      .reduce((o, key) => ({ ...o, [key]: item[key] }), {});
    return group
      ? groups.map(g => (g === group ? { ...g, items: [...g.items, data] } : g))
      : [
          ...groups,
          {
            key: keys.reduce((o, key) => ({ ...o, [key]: item[key] }), {}),
            items: [data]
          }
        ];
  }, []);
  return grouping.thenby ? groups.map(g => ({ ...g, items: groupBy(g.items, grouping.thenby) })) : groups;
};

使用lodash库很简单

let temp = []
  _.map(yourCollectionData, (row) => {
    let index = _.findIndex(temp, { 'Phase': row.Phase })
    if (index > -1) {
      temp[index].Value += row.Value 
    } else {
      temp.push(row)
    }
  })