我也面临着同样的问题，但我已经成功地处理了异步等待。 请检查是否有帮助。 let dataLength = 25; 之前: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); } 后: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ 等待sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); }

当我在mac osx上安装aglio时，我也得到了这个警告。

我使用cmd修复它。

sudo npm install -g npm@next

https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/13806

节点版本号:v11.10.1

来自堆栈跟踪的警告消息:

process.on('warning', e => console.warn(e.stack));

(node:17905) MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 wakeup listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 wakeup listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
    at _addListener (events.js:255:17)
    at Connection.addListener (events.js:271:10)
    at Connection.Readable.on (_stream_readable.js:826:35)
    at Connection.once (events.js:300:8)
    at Connection._send (/var/www/html/fleet-node-api/node_modules/http2/lib/protocol/connection.js:355:10)
    at processImmediate (timers.js:637:19)
    at process.topLevelDomainCallback (domain.js:126:23)

在搜索github问题，文档和创建类似的事件发射器内存泄漏后，由于node-apn模块用于iOS推送通知，观察到此问题。

这就解决了问题:

您应该为每个进程只创建一个Provider 您拥有的证书/密钥对。您不需要创建一个新的 每个通知的提供者。如果你只是发送通知 一个应用程序，那么就不需要一个以上的提供商。 如果你经常在你的应用程序中创建Provider实例，make 当你使用完每个提供者时，一定要调用provider .shutdown() 释放其资源和内存。

每次发送通知时，我都在创建提供者对象，并期望gc将其清除。

我也面临着同样的问题，但我已经成功地处理了异步等待。 请检查是否有帮助。 let dataLength = 25; 之前: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); } 后: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ 等待sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); }

在创建新的侦听器之前，您需要使用以下命令清除所有侦听器:

客户端/服务器

socket.removeAllListeners(); 

假设socket是您的客户端套接字/或创建的服务器套接字。

你也可以订阅特定的事件监听器，比如像这样删除连接监听器:

this.socket.removeAllListeners("connect");

You said you are using process.on('uncaughtException', callback); Where are you executing this statement? Is it within the callback passed to http.createServer?If yes, different copy of the same callback will get attached to the uncaughtException event upon each new request, because the function (req, res) { ... } gets executed everytime a new request comes in and so will the statement process.on('uncaughtException', callback);Note that the process object is global to all your requests and adding listeners to its event everytime a new request comes in will not make any sense. You might not want such kind of behaviour. In case you want to attach a new listener for each new request, you should remove all previous listeners attached to the event as they no longer would be required using: process.removeAllListeners('uncaughtException');