You said you are using process.on('uncaughtException', callback); Where are you executing this statement? Is it within the callback passed to http.createServer?If yes, different copy of the same callback will get attached to the uncaughtException event upon each new request, because the function (req, res) { ... } gets executed everytime a new request comes in and so will the statement process.on('uncaughtException', callback);Note that the process object is global to all your requests and adding listeners to its event everytime a new request comes in will not make any sense. You might not want such kind of behaviour. In case you want to attach a new listener for each new request, you should remove all previous listeners attached to the event as they no longer would be required using: process.removeAllListeners('uncaughtException');

有时，这些警告发生在我们没有做过的事情，而是我们忘记做的事情!

当我用npm安装dotenv包时遇到了这个警告，但在我在应用程序开始添加require('dotenv').load()语句之前就被打断了。当我回到项目时，我开始得到“可能的EventEmitter内存泄漏检测到”警告。

我以为问题出在我做了什么，而不是我没做什么!

一旦我发现了我的疏忽并添加了require语句，内存泄漏警告就清除了。

公认的答案提供了如何增加限制的语义，但正如@voltrevo指出的那样，警告是有原因的，您的代码可能存在错误。

考虑以下有bug的代码:

//Assume Logger is a module that emits errors
var Logger = require('./Logger.js');

for (var i = 0; i < 11; i++) {
    //BUG: This will cause the warning
    //As the event listener is added in a loop
    Logger.on('error', function (err) {
        console.log('error writing log: ' + err)
    });

    Logger.writeLog('Hello');
}

现在观察添加监听器的正确方法:

//Good: event listener is not in a loop
Logger.on('error', function (err) {
    console.log('error writing log: ' + err)
});

for (var i = 0; i < 11; i++) {
    Logger.writeLog('Hello');
}

在更改maxListeners之前搜索代码中的类似问题(在其他答案中有解释)

正如其他人所指出的那样，提高限额并不是最好的答案。我也面临着同样的问题，但在我的代码中，我没有使用任何事件侦听器。当我仔细研究代码时，我有时会创建很多承诺。每个承诺都有一些抓取所提供URL的代码(使用一些第三方库)。如果你正在做类似的事情，那么它可能是原因。

在使用ES6的Promise.all()时，限制并发性的最佳方法是什么?

我也面临着同样的问题，但我已经成功地处理了异步等待。 请检查是否有帮助。 let dataLength = 25; 之前: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); } 后: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ 等待sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); }

I prefer to hunt down and fix problems instead of suppressing logs whenever possible. After a couple days of observing this issue in my app, I realized I was setting listeners on the req.socket in an Express middleware to catch socket io errors that kept popping up. At some point, I learned that that was not necessary, but I kept the listeners around anyway. I just removed them and the error you are experiencing went away. I verified it was the cause by running requests to my server with and without the following middleware:

socketEventsHandler(req, res, next) {
        req.socket.on("error", function(err) {
            console.error('------REQ ERROR')
            console.error(err.stack)
        });
        res.socket.on("error", function(err) {
            console.error('------RES ERROR')
            console.error(err.stack)
        });
        next();
    }

删除该中间件将停止您所看到的警告。我会查看您的代码，并尝试找到您可能设置了不需要的侦听器的任何地方。