如何用深度合并代替浅合并?

两个对象。assign和Object spread只做浅合并。

这个问题的一个例子:

// No object nesting
const x = { a: 1 }
const y = { b: 1 }
const z = { ...x, ...y } // { a: 1, b: 1 }

输出是您所期望的。然而，如果我尝试这样做:

// Object nesting
const x = { a: { a: 1 } }
const y = { a: { b: 1 } }
const z = { ...x, ...y } // { a: { b: 1 } }

而不是

{ a: { a: 1, b: 1 } }

你得到

{ a: { b: 1 } }

X被完全覆盖，因为扩展语法只覆盖了一层。这与Object.assign()相同。

有办法做到这一点吗?

当前回答

如果您想合并多个普通对象(不要修改输入对象)。基于对象。分配polyfill

如果你想合并有限的深度

2021-08-15 07:09:20

其他回答

下面是TypeScript的实现:

export const mergeObjects = <T extends object = object>(target: T, ...sources: T[]): T  => {
  if (!sources.length) {
    return target;
  }
  const source = sources.shift();
  if (source === undefined) {
    return target;
  }

  if (isMergebleObject(target) && isMergebleObject(source)) {
    Object.keys(source).forEach(function(key: string) {
      if (isMergebleObject(source[key])) {
        if (!target[key]) {
          target[key] = {};
        }
        mergeObjects(target[key], source[key]);
      } else {
        target[key] = source[key];
      }
    });
  }

  return mergeObjects(target, ...sources);
};

const isObject = (item: any): boolean => {
  return item !== null && typeof item === 'object';
};

const isMergebleObject = (item): boolean => {
  return isObject(item) && !Array.isArray(item);
};

和单元测试:

describe('merge', () => {
  it('should merge Objects and all nested Ones', () => {
    const obj1 = { a: { a1: 'A1'}, c: 'C', d: {} };
    const obj2 = { a: { a2: 'A2'}, b: { b1: 'B1'}, d: null };
    const obj3 = { a: { a1: 'A1', a2: 'A2'}, b: { b1: 'B1'}, c: 'C', d: null};
    expect(mergeObjects({}, obj1, obj2)).toEqual(obj3);
  });
  it('should behave like Object.assign on the top level', () => {
    const obj1 = { a: { a1: 'A1'}, c: 'C'};
    const obj2 = { a: undefined, b: { b1: 'B1'}};
    expect(mergeObjects({}, obj1, obj2)).toEqual(Object.assign({}, obj1, obj2));
  });
  it('should not merge array values, just override', () => {
    const obj1 = {a: ['A', 'B']};
    const obj2 = {a: ['C'], b: ['D']};
    expect(mergeObjects({}, obj1, obj2)).toEqual({a: ['C'], b: ['D']});
  });
  it('typed merge', () => {
    expect(mergeObjects<TestPosition>(new TestPosition(0, 0), new TestPosition(1, 1)))
      .toEqual(new TestPosition(1, 1));
  });
});

class TestPosition {
  constructor(public x: number = 0, public y: number = 0) {/*empty*/}
}

2017-10-27 10:47:40

有人知道深度合并在ES6/ES7规范中存在吗?

对象。赋值文档建议它不做深度克隆。

2016-08-11 23:38:38

2022年更新:

我创建mergician是为了满足评论中讨论的各种合并/克隆需求。它基于与我最初的答案相同的概念(如下)，但提供了可配置的选项:

Unlike native methods and other merge/clone utilities, Mergician provides advanced options for customizing the merge/clone process. These options make it easy to inspect, filter, and modify keys and properties; merge or skip unique, common, and universal keys (i.e., intersections, unions, and differences); and merge, sort, and remove duplicates from arrays. Property accessors and descriptors are also handled properly, ensuring that getter/setter functions are retained and descriptor values are defined on new merged/cloned objects.

值得注意的是，mergician比lodash等类似工具要小得多(1.5k min+gzip)。合并(5.1k min+gzip)。

GitHub: https://github.com/jhildenbiddle/mergician NPM: https://www.npmjs.com/package/mergician 文档:https://jhildenbiddle.github.io/mergician/

最初的回答:

由于这个问题仍然存在，这里有另一种方法:

ES6/2015 不可变(不修改原始对象) 处理数组(连接它们)

/** * Performs a deep merge of objects and returns new object. Does not modify * objects (immutable) and merges arrays via concatenation. * * @param {...object} objects - Objects to merge * @returns {object} New object with merged key/values */ function mergeDeep(...objects) { const isObject = obj => obj && typeof obj === 'object'; return objects.reduce((prev, obj) => { Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => { const pVal = prev[key]; const oVal = obj[key]; if (Array.isArray(pVal) && Array.isArray(oVal)) { prev[key] = pVal.concat(...oVal); } else if (isObject(pVal) && isObject(oVal)) { prev[key] = mergeDeep(pVal, oVal); } else { prev[key] = oVal; } }); return prev; }, {}); } // Test objects const obj1 = { a: 1, b: 1, c: { x: 1, y: 1 }, d: [ 1, 1 ] } const obj2 = { b: 2, c: { y: 2, z: 2 }, d: [ 2, 2 ], e: 2 } const obj3 = mergeDeep(obj1, obj2); // Out console.log(obj3);

2018-01-12 01:15:47

这里，直走;

一个简单的解决方案，工作像Object。仅赋值deep，适用于数组，无需任何修改。

function deepAssign(target, ...sources) { for (source of sources) { for (let k in source) { let vs = source[k], vt = target[k] if (Object(vs) == vs && Object(vt) === vt) { target[k] = deepAssign(vt, vs) continue } target[k] = source[k] } } return target } x = { a: { a: 1 }, b: [1,2] } y = { a: { b: 1 }, b: [3] } z = { c: 3, b: [,,,4] } x = deepAssign(x, y, z) console.log(JSON.stringify(x) === JSON.stringify({ "a": { "a": 1, "b": 1 }, "b": [ 1, 2, null, 4 ], "c": 3 }))

编辑: 我在别的地方回答过一种深度比较两个对象的新方法。该方法也可以用于深度合并。如果你想要植入，请留言 https://stackoverflow.com/a/71177790/1919821

2020-04-23 19:02:59

我知道这是一个老问题，但在ES2015/ES6中我能想到的最简单的解决方案实际上很简单，使用Object.assign()，

希望这能有所帮助:

/**
 * Simple object check.
 * @param item
 * @returns {boolean}
 */
export function isObject(item) {
  return (item && typeof item === 'object' && !Array.isArray(item));
}

/**
 * Deep merge two objects.
 * @param target
 * @param ...sources
 */
export function mergeDeep(target, ...sources) {
  if (!sources.length) return target;
  const source = sources.shift();

  if (isObject(target) && isObject(source)) {
    for (const key in source) {
      if (isObject(source[key])) {
        if (!target[key]) Object.assign(target, { [key]: {} });
        mergeDeep(target[key], source[key]);
      } else {
        Object.assign(target, { [key]: source[key] });
      }
    }
  }

  return mergeDeep(target, ...sources);
}

使用示例:

mergeDeep(this, { a: { b: { c: 123 } } });
// or
const merged = mergeDeep({a: 1}, { b : { c: { d: { e: 12345}}}});  
console.dir(merged); // { a: 1, b: { c: { d: [Object] } } }

你将在下面的答案中找到一个不可更改的版本。

注意，这将导致循环引用上的无限递归。这里有一些关于如何检测循环引用的很好的答案，如果你认为你会面临这个问题。

2016-01-12 17:15:35

如何用深度合并代替浅合并?

推荐文章

最新文章

标签