封装和抽象之间的确切区别是什么?


当前回答

下面这段话帮助我理解了它们之间的区别:

数据封装是一种捆绑数据的机制 使用它们的函数和数据抽象是一种机制 只暴露接口,隐藏实现细节 来自用户。

你可以在这里阅读更多。

其他回答

抽象:以一种简化的/不同的方式来呈现事物的想法,这种方式要么更容易理解和使用,要么更切合实际。

考虑一个发送电子邮件的类……它使用抽象来向你展示自己作为某种信使,所以你可以调用emailSender。发送(邮件,收件人)。它的实际功能——选择POP3 / SMTP、调用服务器、MIME转换等等,都被抽象了出来。你只看到你的信使。

封装:保护和隐藏对象私有的数据和方法的思想。它更多的是让某样东西独立且万无一失。

以我为例。我把我的心率从世界其他地方压缩起来。因为我不希望其他人改变这个变量,我也不需要其他人来设置它来让我运行。它对我来说至关重要,但你不需要知道它是什么,而且你可能根本不在乎。

环顾四周,您会发现几乎所有您接触到的东西都是抽象和封装的例子。例如,你的手机向你展示了一种抽象的功能,它能把你说的话传达给别人——掩盖了GSM、处理器架构、无线电频率以及其他无数你不理解或不关心的东西。它还封装了来自您的某些数据,如序列号、ID号、频率等。

这一切都使世界成为一个更美好的居住地

我认为封装是实现抽象的一种方式。看看下面的链接。

抽象和封装

上面提供了很多很好的答案,但我将在这里介绍我的(Java)观点。

数据封装简单地说就是包装和控制类中逻辑分组数据的访问。它通常与另一个关键字-数据隐藏相关联。这是在Java中使用访问修饰符实现的。

一个简单的例子是定义一个私有变量,并使用getter和setter方法访问它,或者将一个方法设置为私有,因为它只在类中使用。用户不需要知道这些方法和变量。

注意:不要误解封装只是关于数据隐藏。当我们说封装时,重点应该是将相关数据和行为分组、打包或捆绑在一起。

另一方面,数据抽象是泛化的概念,这样底层的复杂逻辑就不会暴露给用户。在Java中,这是通过使用接口和抽象类实现的。

的例子,

Lets say we have an interface Animal and it has a function makeSound(). There are two concrete classes Dog and Cat that implement this interface. These concrete classes have separate implementations of makeSound() function. Now lets say we have a animal(We get this from some external module). All user knows is that the object that it is receiving is some Animal and it is the users responsibility to print the animal sound. One brute force way is to check the object received to identify it's type, then typecast it to that Animal type and then call makeSound() on it. But a neater way is to abstracts thing out. Use Animal as a polymorphic reference and call makeSound() on it. At runtime depending on what the real Object type is proper function will be invoked.

详情请点击这里。

复杂的逻辑是在电路板中,封装在一个触摸板中,并提供了一个漂亮的界面(按钮)来将其抽象给用户。

附注:以上链接是我的个人博客。

从这个

OOPS中封装和抽象的区别

抽象和封装是两个重要的面向对象编程(oop)概念。封装和抽象都是相互关联的术语。

封装和抽象的现实区别

封装意味着隐藏。封装也称为数据隐藏。你可以把胶囊想象成胶囊(药片),里面藏着药。封装是包装,只是隐藏属性和方法。封装用于将代码和数据隐藏在单个单元中,以保护数据不受外界的影响。类是封装的最佳示例。

抽象指的是只向预期的用户显示必要的细节。顾名思义,抽象是“任何事物的抽象形式”。我们在编程语言中使用抽象来创建抽象类。抽象类表示类的方法和属性的抽象视图。

封装和抽象之间的实现差异

Abstraction is implemented using interface and abstract class while Encapsulation is implemented using private and protected access modifier. OOPS makes use of encapsulation to enforce the integrity of a type (i.e. to make sure data is used in an appropriate manner) by preventing programmers from accessing data in a non-intended manner. Through encapsulation, only a predetermined group of functions can access the data. The collective term for datatypes and operations (methods) bundled together with access restrictions (public/private, etc.) is a class.

抽象或封装并不严格要求信息隐藏。信息可能会被忽略,但不一定要隐藏。

封装是一种将事物视为单一事物的能力,即使它可能由许多复杂的部分或思想组成。例如,我可以说我坐在一把“椅子”上,而不是指这把椅子上的许多不同部分,每个部分都有特定的设计和功能,它们精确地组合在一起,目的是让我的屁股舒适地离地板几英尺远。

Abstraction is enabled by encapsulation. Because we encapsulate objects, we can think about them as things which relate to each other in some way rather than getting bogged down in the subtle details of internal object structure. Abstraction is the ability to consider the bigger picture, removed from concern over little details. The root of the word is abstract as in the summary that appears at the top of a scholarly paper, not abstract as in a class which can only be instantiated as a derived subclass.

I can honestly say that when I plop my butt down in my chair, I never think about how the structure of that chair will catch and hold my weight. It's a decent enough chair that I don't have to worry about those details. So I can turn my attention toward my computer. And again, I don't think about the component parts of my computer. I'm just looking at a part of a webpage that represents a text area that I can type in, and I'm communicating in words, barely even thinking about how my fingers always find the right letters so quickly on the keyboard, and how the connection is ultimately made between tapping these keys and posting to this forum. This is the great power of abstraction. Because the lower levels of the system can be trusted to work with consistency and precision, we have attention to spare for greater work.