封装和抽象之间的确切区别是什么?


当前回答

下面这段话帮助我理解了它们之间的区别:

数据封装是一种捆绑数据的机制 使用它们的函数和数据抽象是一种机制 只暴露接口,隐藏实现细节 来自用户。

你可以在这里阅读更多。

其他回答

让我们以堆栈为例。它可以使用数组或链表来实现。但它支持的操作是推送和弹出。

Now abstraction is exposing only the interfaces push and pop. The underlying representation is hidden (is it an array or a linked list?) and a well-defined interface is provided. Now how do you ensure that no accidental access is made to the abstracted data? That is where encapsulation comes in. For example, classes in C++ use the access specifiers which ensure that accidental access and modification is prevented. And also, by making the above-mentioned interfaces as public, it ensures that the only way to manipulate the stack is through the well-defined interface. In the process, it has coupled the data and the code that can manipulate it (let's not get the friend functions involved here). That is, the code and data are bonded together or tied or encapsulated.

封装:对对象的实际用户隐藏不需要的/不期望的/适当的实现细节。 如。

List<string> list = new List<string>();
list.Sort(); /* Here, which sorting algorithm is used and hows its 
implemented is not useful to the user who wants to perform sort, that's 
why its hidden from the user of list. */

抽象:是一种提供泛化的方法,因此是处理大量不同对象的通用方法。如。

class Aeroplane : IFlyable, IFuelable, IMachine
{ // Aeroplane's Design says:
  // Aeroplane is a flying object
  // Aeroplane can be fueled
  // Aeroplane is a Machine
}
// But the code related to Pilot, or Driver of Aeroplane is not bothered 
// about Machine or Fuel. Hence,
// pilot code:
IFlyable flyingObj = new Aeroplane();
flyingObj.Fly();
// fighter Pilot related code
IFlyable flyingObj2 = new FighterAeroplane();
flyingObj2.Fly();
// UFO related code 
IFlyable ufoObj = new UFO();
ufoObj.Fly();
// **All the 3 Above codes are genaralized using IFlyable,
// Interface Abstraction**
// Fly related code knows how to fly, irrespective of the type of 
// flying object they are.

// Similarly, Fuel related code:
// Fueling an Aeroplane
IFuelable fuelableObj = new Aeroplane();
fuelableObj.FillFuel();
// Fueling a Car
IFuelable fuelableObj2 = new Car(); // class Car : IFuelable { }
fuelableObj2.FillFuel();

// ** Fueling code does not need know what kind of vehicle it is, so far 
// as it can Fill Fuel**

另一个例子:

假设我创建了一个不可变的Rectangle类,如下所示:

class Rectangle {
 public:
  Rectangle(int width, int height) : width_(width), height_(height) {}
  int width() const { return width_; }
  int height() const { return height_; }

 private:
  int width_;
  int height_;
}

现在很明显,我已经封装了宽度和高度(访问受到某种限制),但我没有抽象任何东西(好吧,也许我忽略了矩形在坐标空间中的位置,但这是示例的缺陷)。

好的抽象通常意味着好的封装。

一个好的抽象例子是通用数据库连接类。它的公共接口与数据库无关,非常简单,但允许我对连接做我想做的事情。你看到了吗?这里还有封装,因为类内部必须有所有低级句柄和调用。

抽象让您关注对象做了什么,而不是它是如何做的 封装意味着隐藏对象如何做某事的内部细节或机制。

就像你开车时,你知道油门踏板的作用,但你可能不知道它背后的过程,因为它是封装的。

让我用c#举个例子。假设你有一个整数:

int Number = 5;
string aStrNumber = Number.ToString();

你可以使用像number . tostring()这样的方法,它返回数字5的字符表示,并将其存储在字符串对象中。该方法告诉您它做了什么,而不是如何做。

有一件事,也许是其他答案忘记提到的一个基本的事情是,封装是抽象。因此,将两者进行对比并寻找差异是不准确的,而应该将封装视为一种抽象形式。