使用C#,如何删除目录中的所有文件和文件夹,但仍然保留根目录?


当前回答

System.IO.DirectoryInfo di = new DirectoryInfo("YourPath");

foreach (FileInfo file in di.GetFiles())
{
    file.Delete(); 
}
foreach (DirectoryInfo dir in di.GetDirectories())
{
    dir.Delete(true); 
}

如果您的目录可能有许多文件,EnumerateFiles()比GetFiles()更有效,因为当您使用EnumerateFile()时,您可以在返回整个集合之前开始枚举它,而不是GetFiles(,在开始枚举之前,您需要在内存中加载整个集合。请参阅此处的引用:

因此,当您使用许多文件和目录时,EnumerateFiles()可以更有效。

这同样适用于EnumerateDirectories()和GetDirectory()。所以代码应该是:

foreach (FileInfo file in di.EnumerateFiles())
{
    file.Delete(); 
}
foreach (DirectoryInfo dir in di.EnumerateDirectories())
{
    dir.Delete(true); 
}

对于这个问题,确实没有理由使用GetFiles()和GetDirectories()。

其他回答

System.IO.Directory.Delete(installPath, true);
System.IO.Directory.CreateDirectory(installPath);

要删除文件夹,这是使用文本框的代码和使用System.IO;的按钮:

private void Deletebt_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    System.IO.DirectoryInfo myDirInfo = new DirectoryInfo(@"" + delete.Text);

    foreach (FileInfo file in myDirInfo.GetFiles())
    {
       file.Delete();
    }
    foreach (DirectoryInfo dir in myDirInfo.GetDirectories())
    {
       dir.Delete(true);
    }
}

从主机调用

static void Main(string[] args)
{ 
   string Filepathe =<Your path>
   DeleteDirectory(System.IO.Directory.GetParent(Filepathe).FullName);              
}

添加此方法

public static void DeleteDirectory(string path)
{
    if (Directory.Exists(path))
    {
        //Delete all files from the Directory
        foreach (string file in Directory.GetFiles(path))
        {
            File.Delete(file);
        }
        //Delete all child Directories
        foreach (string directory in Directory.GetDirectories(path))
        {
             DeleteDirectory(directory);
        }
        //Delete a Directory
        Directory.Delete(path);
    }
 }

在Windows 7中,如果您刚刚使用Windows资源管理器手动创建了它,则目录结构与以下类似:

C:
  \AAA
    \BBB
      \CCC
        \DDD

运行原始问题中建议的代码来清理目录C:\AAA,当尝试删除BBB时,行di.Delete(true)总是失败,并出现IOException“目录不是空的”。这可能是由于Windows资源管理器中的某种延迟/缓存。

以下代码对我来说工作可靠:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    DirectoryInfo di = new DirectoryInfo(@"c:\aaa");
    CleanDirectory(di);
}

private static void CleanDirectory(DirectoryInfo di)
{
    if (di == null)
        return;

    foreach (FileSystemInfo fsEntry in di.GetFileSystemInfos())
    {
        CleanDirectory(fsEntry as DirectoryInfo);
        fsEntry.Delete();
    }
    WaitForDirectoryToBecomeEmpty(di);
}

private static void WaitForDirectoryToBecomeEmpty(DirectoryInfo di)
{
    for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
    {
        if (di.GetFileSystemInfos().Length == 0)
            return;
        Console.WriteLine(di.FullName + i);
        Thread.Sleep(50 * i);
    }
}

我们也可以表现出对LINQ的热爱:

using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
…
var directory = Directory.GetParent(TestContext.TestDir);

directory.EnumerateFiles()
    .ToList().ForEach(f => f.Delete());

directory.EnumerateDirectories()
    .ToList().ForEach(d => d.Delete(true));

请注意,我这里的解决方案不是高性能的,因为我使用的是Get*().ToList().ForEach(…),它两次生成相同的IEnumerable。我使用扩展方法来避免此问题:

using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
…
var directory = Directory.GetParent(TestContext.TestDir);

directory.EnumerateFiles()
    .ForEachInEnumerable(f => f.Delete());

directory.EnumerateDirectories()
    .ForEachInEnumerable(d => d.Delete(true));

这是扩展方法:

/// <summary>
/// Extensions for <see cref="System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable"/>.
/// </summary>
public static class IEnumerableOfTExtensions
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Performs the <see cref="System.Action"/>
    /// on each item in the enumerable object.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="TEnumerable">The type of the enumerable.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="enumerable">The enumerable.</param>
    /// <param name="action">The action.</param>
    /// <remarks>
    /// “I am philosophically opposed to providing such a method, for two reasons.
    /// …The first reason is that doing so violates the functional programming principles
    /// that all the other sequence operators are based upon. Clearly the sole purpose of a call
    /// to this method is to cause side effects.”
    /// —Eric Lippert, “foreach” vs “ForEach” [http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2009/05/18/foreach-vs-foreach.aspx]
    /// </remarks>
    public static void ForEachInEnumerable<TEnumerable>(this IEnumerable<TEnumerable> enumerable, Action<TEnumerable> action)
    {
        foreach (var item in enumerable)
        {
            action(item);
        }
    }
}