这个问题中的许多评论者不理解PHP中的数组是如何工作的。从数组文档:

键可以是整数，也可以是字符串。如果一个键是一个整数的标准表示，它将被这样解释(即。“8”解释为8，“08”解释为“08”)。key中的浮点数被截断为整数。在PHP中，索引数组和关联数组类型是相同的类型，它们都可以包含整数和字符串索引。

换句话说，没有数组键“8”这样的东西，因为它总是(无声地)转换为整数8。因此，试图区分整数和数字字符串是不必要的。

如果你想要最有效的方法来检查一个数组的非整数键，而不需要复制数组的一部分(像array_keys()那样)或全部(像foreach那样):

function keyedNext( &$arr, &$k){
    $k = key($arr);
    return next($arr);
}

for ($k = key(reset($my_array)); is_int($k); keyedNext($my_array,$k))
    $onlyIntKeys = is_null($k);

这是因为key()在当前数组位置无效时返回NULL，并且NULL永远不会是一个有效的键(如果你试图使用NULL作为数组键，它会被无声地转换为“”)。

我认为下面两个函数是最好的方法去检查'如果一个数组是结合或数字'。由于'numeric'可能只表示数字键或顺序数字键，下面列出了两个函数来检查这两种情况:

function is_indexed_array(&$arr) {
  for (reset($arr); is_int(key($arr)); next($arr));
  return is_null(key($arr));
}

function is_sequential_array(&$arr, $base = 0) {
  for (reset($arr), $base = (int) $base; key($arr) === $base++; next($arr));
  return is_null(key($arr));
}

The first function checks if each key is an integer value. The second function checks if each key is an integer value and in addition checks if all keys are sequential starting at $base, which defaults to 0 and thus can be omitted if you do not need to specify another base value. key($my_array) returns null if the read pointer is moved past the end of the array, which is what ends the for loop and makes the statement after the for loop return true if all keys were integer. If not, the loop ends prematurely because a key is of type string, and the statement after the for loop will return false. The latter function in addition adds one to $base after each compare, to be able to check if the next key is of the correct value. The strict compare makes it also check if the key is of type integer. The $base = (int) $base part in the first section of the for loop can be left out when $base is omitted or if you make sure it is only called using an integer. But since I can't be sure for everybody, I left it in. The statement is executed only once, anyway. I think these are the most efficient solutions:

Memory wise: No copying of data or key ranges. Doing an array_values or array_keys may seem shorter (less code) but keep in mind what goes on in the background once you make that call. Yes there are more (visible) statements than in some other solutions, but that is not what counts, is it? Time wise: Besides the fact that copying/extracting data and/or keys also takes time, this solution is more efficient than doing a foreach. Again a foreach may seem more efficient to some because it is shorter in notation, but in the background foreach also calls reset, key and next to do it's looping. But in addition it also calls valid to check the end condition, which is avoided here due to the combination with the integer check.

请记住，数组键只能是整数或字符串，严格的数字字符串，如“1”(但不是“01”)将被转换为整数。如果您希望数组是顺序的，这使得检查整数键成为除了计数之外唯一需要的操作。当然，如果is_indexed_array返回false，则可以将该数组视为关联数组。我说“见过”，因为事实上它们都是。

A lot of the solutions here are elegant and pretty, but don't scale well, and are memory intensive or CPU intensive. Most are creating 2 new data points in memory with this solution from both sides of the comparison. The larger the array the harder and longer the process and memory used, and you lose the benefit of short circuit evaluation. I Did some testing with a few different ideas. Trying to avoid array_key_exists as it is costly, and also avoiding creating new large datasets to compare. I feel this is a simple way to tell if an array is sequential.

public function is_sequential( $arr = [] ){
    if( !is_array( $arr ) || empty( $arr ) ) return false;

    $i = 0;

    $total = count( $arr );

    foreach( $arr as $key => $value ) if( $key !== $i++ ) return false;

    return true;
}

在主数组上运行一个计数并存储一个整数。然后循环遍历数组并在迭代计数器时检查精确匹配。你应该从1开始计数。如果它失败了，它会短路，当它为假时，它会给你性能的提升。

最初，我这样做了一个for循环和检查isset($arr[$ I])，但这将不检测null键，这需要array_key_exists，我们知道，这是最糟糕的函数使用速度。

通过foreach不断更新变量，并检查迭代器，永远不会超过它的整数大小，让PHP使用它内置的内存优化，缓存和垃圾收集，以保持非常低的资源使用。

此外，我认为在foreach中使用array_keys是愚蠢的，因为您可以简单地运行$key => $value并检查键。为什么要创建新的数据点?一旦抽象出数组键，就会立即消耗更多内存。

从源头再来一个。 json_encode(和bson_encode)的拟合编码。javascript数组的一致性也是如此。

function isSequential($value){
    if(is_array($value) || ($value instanceof \Countable && $value instanceof \ArrayAccess)){
        for ($i = count($value) - 1; $i >= 0; $i--) {
            if (!isset($value[$i]) && !array_key_exists($i, $value)) {
                return false;
            }
        }
        return true;
    } else {
        throw new \InvalidArgumentException(
            sprintf('Data type "%s" is not supported by method %s', gettype($value), __METHOD__)
        );
    }
}

function is_assoc(array $array): bool
{
    foreach ($array as $iValue) {
        if (is_array($iValue)) {
            return  true;
        }
    }
    return false;

}

$d= is_assoc(["id",2,3]);

var_dump($d);

一种廉价而肮脏的方法是这样检查:

isset($myArray[count($myArray) - 1])

.．.如果你的数组是这样的，你可能会得到一个假阳性:

$myArray = array("1" => "apple", "b" => "banana");

一个更彻底的方法可能是检查钥匙:

function arrayIsAssociative($myArray) {
    foreach (array_keys($myArray) as $ind => $key) {
        if (!is_numeric($key) || (isset($myArray[$ind + 1]) && $myArray[$ind + 1] != $key + 1)) {
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}
// this will only return true if all the keys are numeric AND sequential, which
// is what you get when you define an array like this:
// array("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");

or

function arrayIsAssociative($myArray) {
    $l = count($myArray);
    for ($i = 0; $i < $l, ++$i) {
        if (!isset($myArray[$i])) return true;
    }
    return false;
}
// this will return a false positive on an array like this:
$x = array(1 => "b", 0 => "a", 2 => "c", 4 => "e", 3 => "d");