该解决方案在可读性和可维护性之间取得了适当的平衡。

struct Card {

    // ...

    static func deck() -> Card[] {
        var deck = Card[]()
        for rank in Rank.Ace.toRaw()...Rank.King.toRaw() {
            for suit in [Suit.Spades, .Hearts, .Clubs, .Diamonds] {
                let card = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(rank)!, suit: suit)
                deck.append(card)
            }
        }
    return deck
    }
}

let deck = Card.deck()

这看起来像一个黑客，但如果你使用原始值，你可以这样做

enum Suit: Int {  
    case Spades = 0, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs  
 ...  
}  

var suitIndex = 0  
while var suit = Suit.fromRaw(suitIndex++) {  
   ...  
}  

与@Kametrixom的答案在这里，我相信返回一个数组将比返回AnySequence更好，因为你可以访问所有数组的好东西，如计数等。

以下是改写后的内容:

public protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
    public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
        typealias S = Self
        let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
            var raw = 0
            return AnyGenerator {
                let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
                guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
                raw += 1
                return current
            }
        }

        return [S](retVal)
    }
}

Swift 4 + 2。

从Swift 4.2 (Xcode 10)开始，只需将协议一致性添加到CaseIterable中，就可以从allCases中受益。要添加这个协议一致性，你只需要在某个地方写:

extension Suit: CaseIterable {}

如果枚举是你自己的，你可以直接在声明中指定一致性:

enum Suit: String, CaseIterable { case spades = "♠"; case hearts = "♥"; case diamonds = "♦"; case clubs = "♣" }

然后下面的代码将打印所有可能的值:

Suit.allCases.forEach {
    print($0.rawValue)
}

与早期Swift版本的兼容性(3。X和4.x)

如果您需要支持Swift 3。x或4.0，你可以通过添加以下代码来模仿Swift 4.2的实现:

#if !swift(>=4.2)
public protocol CaseIterable {
    associatedtype AllCases: Collection where AllCases.Element == Self
    static var allCases: AllCases { get }
}
extension CaseIterable where Self: Hashable {
    static var allCases: [Self] {
        return [Self](AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<Self> in
            var raw = 0
            var first: Self?
            return AnyIterator {
                let current = withUnsafeBytes(of: &raw) { $0.load(as: Self.self) }
                if raw == 0 {
                    first = current
                } else if current == first {
                    return nil
                }
                raw += 1
                return current
            }
        })
    }
}
#endif

原则上，如果你不为enum的大小写使用原始值赋值，这样做是可能的:

enum RankEnum: Int {
  case Ace
  case One
  case Two
}

class RankEnumGenerator: Generator {
    var i = 0
    typealias Element = RankEnum
    func next() -> Element? {
        let r = RankEnum.fromRaw(i)
        i += 1
        return r
    }
}

extension RankEnum {
    static func enumerate() -> SequenceOf<RankEnum> {
        return SequenceOf<RankEnum>({ RankEnumGenerator() })
    }
}

for r in RankEnum.enumerate() {
    println("\(r.toRaw())")
}

您可以通过实现ForwardIndexType协议来迭代枚举。

ForwardIndexType协议要求您定义一个继任者()函数来逐级遍历元素。

enum Rank: Int, ForwardIndexType {
    case Ace = 1
    case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
    case Jack, Queen, King

    // ... other functions

    // Option 1 - Figure it out by hand
    func successor() -> Rank {
        switch self {
            case .Ace:
              return .Two
            case .Two:
              return .Three

            // ... etc.

            default:
              return .King
        }
    }

    // Option 2 - Define an operator!
    func successor() -> Rank {
        return self + 1
    }
}

// NOTE: The operator is defined OUTSIDE the class
func + (left: Rank, right: Int) -> Rank {
    // I'm using to/from raw here, but again, you can use a case statement
    // or whatever else you can think of

    return left == .King ? .King : Rank(rawValue: left.rawValue + right)!
}

在开或闭范围内迭代(..<或…)将在内部调用继任者()函数，允许你这样写:

// Under the covers, successor(Rank.King) and successor(Rank.Ace) are called to establish limits
for r in Rank.Ace...Rank.King {
    // Do something useful
}