父组件

import Child from './Child'

export default function Parent(props) {
    const [childRefreshFunction, setChildRefreshFunction] = useState(null);

    return (
        <div>
            <button type="button" onClick={() => {
                childRefreshFunction();
            }}>Refresh child</button>
            <Child setRefreshFunction={(f) => {
                setChildRefreshFunction(f);
            }} />
        </div>
    )
}

子组件

export default function Child(props) {

    useEffect(() => {
        props.setRefreshFunction(() => refreshMe);
    }, []);

    function refreshMe() {
        fetch('http://example.com/data.json')....
    };

    return (
        <div>
            child
        </div>
    )
}

https://facebook.github.io/react/tips/expose-component-functions.html 更多答案请参考这里调用React子组件上的方法

通过查看“reason”组件的引用，您正在破坏封装，如果不仔细检查使用该组件的所有位置，就不可能重构该组件。正因为如此，我们强烈建议将引用视为组件的私有，就像状态一样。

一般来说，数据应该通过道具沿着树向下传递。有一些例外情况(比如调用.focus()或触发一个不会真正“改变”状态的一次性动画)，但任何时候你要公开一个名为“set”的方法，道具通常是更好的选择。试着让内部输入组件担心它的大小和外观，这样它的祖先就不会担心。

I wasn't satisfied with any of the solutions presented here. There is actually a very simple solution that can be done using pure Javascript without relying upon some React functionality other than the basic props object - and it gives you the benefit of communicating in either direction (parent -> child, child -> parent). You need to pass an object from the parent component to the child component. This object is what I refer to as a "bi-directional reference" or biRef for short. Basically, the object contains a reference to methods in the parent that the parent wants to expose. And the child component attaches methods to the object that the parent can call. Something like this:

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      someParentFunction: someParentFunction
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef.someChildFunction = someChildFunction;

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

这种解决方案的另一个优点是，您可以在父节点和子节点中添加更多的函数，同时只使用一个属性将它们从父节点传递给子节点。

对上述代码的改进是不直接向biRef对象添加父函数和子函数，而是向子成员添加。父函数应该添加到名为“Parent”的成员中，而子函数应该添加到名为“child”的成员中。

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.child.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      parent: {
          someParentFunction: someParentFunction
      }
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.parent.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef {
       child: {
            someChildFunction: someChildFunction
       }
   }

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

通过将父函数和子函数放在biRef对象的独立成员中，您将在两者之间有一个清晰的分离，并且很容易看到哪个属于父函数或子函数。如果父组件和子组件中都出现了相同的函数，它还有助于防止子组件意外地覆盖父函数。

One last thing is that if you note, the parent component creates the biRef object with var whereas the child component accesses it through the props object. It might be tempting to not define the biRef object in the parent and access it from its parent through its own props parameter (which might be the case in a hierarchy of UI elements). This is risky because the child may think a function it is calling on the parent belongs to the parent when it might actually belong to a grandparent. There's nothing wrong with this as long as you are aware of it. Unless you have a reason for supporting some hierarchy beyond a parent/child relationship, it's best to create the biRef in your parent component.

您可以使用ref从父组件调用子组件的函数

功能组件解决方案

在函数组件中，你必须使用useImperativeHandle来获取引用到如下所示的子组件中

import React, { forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle } from 'react';
export default function ParentFunction() {
    const childRef = useRef();
    return (
        <div className="container">
            <div>
                Parent Component
            </div>
            <button
                onClick={() => { childRef.current.showAlert() }}
            >
            Call Function
            </button>
            <Child ref={childRef}/>
        </div>
    )
}
const Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
    useImperativeHandle(
        ref,
        () => ({
            showAlert() {
                alert("Child Function Called")
            }
        }),
    )
    return (
       <div>Child Component</div>
    )
})

类组件解决方案

Child.js

import s from './Child.css';

class Child extends Component {
 getAlert() {
    alert('clicked');
 }
 render() {
  return (
    <h1>Hello</h1>
  );
 }
}

export default Child;

Parent.js

class Parent extends Component {
 render() {
  onClick() {
    this.refs.child.getAlert();
  }
  return (
    <div>
      <Child ref="child" />
      <button onClick={this.onClick}>Click</button>
    </div>
  );
 }
}

我希望我没有重复上面的内容但是如果传递一个回调道具来设置父类中的函数呢?这很有效，也很简单。(添加的代码在////之间)

class Parent extends Component {
  ///// 
  getAlert = () => {} // initial value for getAlert

  setGetAlertMethod = (newMethod) => {
    this.getAlert = newMethod;
  }
  /////

  render() {
    return (
      <Child setGetAlertMethod={this.setGetAlertMethod}>
        <button onClick={this.getAlert}>Click</button>
      </Child>
      );
    }
  }



class Child extends Component {
  /////
  componentDidMount() {
    this.props.setGetAlertMethod(this.getAlert);
  }
  /////

  getAlert() => {
    alert('clicked');
  }

  render() {
    return (
      <h1 ref="hello">Hello</h1>
    );
  }
}

这里有个虫子?注意: 我同意rossipedia的解决方案使用forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle

网上有一些错误的信息说refs只能从React类组件创建，但如果你使用上面提到的钩子，你确实可以使用函数组件。注意，只有在我将文件更改为在导出组件时不使用withRouter()后，钩子才对我有效。例如，从

export default withRouter(TableConfig);

取而代之的是

export default TableConfig;

In hindsight the withRouter() is not needed for such a component anyway, but usually it doesn't hurt anything having it in. My use case is that I created a component to create a Table to handle the viewing and editing of config values, and I wanted to be able to tell this Child component to reset it's state values whenever the Parent form's Reset button was hit. UseRef() wouldn't properly get the ref or ref.current (kept on getting null) until I removed withRouter() from the file containing my child component TableConfig