是否有一种方法可以获得MySQL数据库中所有表的行计数,而无需在每个表上运行SELECT count() ?
当前回答
对于这个估算问题,有一点hack/workaround。
Auto_Increment -由于某些原因,如果您在表上设置了自动增量,则此函数将为数据库返回更准确的行数。
在探索为什么显示表信息与实际数据不匹配时发现了这一点。
SELECT
table_schema 'Database',
SUM(data_length + index_length) AS 'DBSize',
SUM(TABLE_ROWS) AS DBRows,
SUM(AUTO_INCREMENT) AS DBAutoIncCount
FROM information_schema.tables
GROUP BY table_schema;
+--------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+
| Database | DBSize | DBRows | DBAutoIncCount |
+--------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+
| Core | 35241984 | 76057 | 8341 |
| information_schema | 163840 | NULL | NULL |
| jspServ | 49152 | 11 | 856 |
| mysql | 7069265 | 30023 | 1 |
| net_snmp | 47415296 | 95123 | 324 |
| performance_schema | 0 | 1395326 | NULL |
| sys | 16384 | 6 | NULL |
| WebCal | 655360 | 2809 | NULL |
| WxObs | 494256128 | 530533 | 3066752 |
+--------------------+-----------+---------+----------------+
9 rows in set (0.40 sec)
然后,您可以轻松地使用PHP或其他工具返回2个数据列的最大值,以给出行数的“最佳估计”。
即。
SELECT
table_schema 'Database',
SUM(data_length + index_length) AS 'DBSize',
GREATEST(SUM(TABLE_ROWS), SUM(AUTO_INCREMENT)) AS DBRows
FROM information_schema.tables
GROUP BY table_schema;
Auto Increment将始终是+1 *(表数)行,但即使有4000个表和300万行,这也是99.9%的准确性。比估计的行数好多了。
这样做的好处是,performance_schema中返回的行计数也会被擦除,因为greatest对null无效。但是,如果没有带有自动递增功能的表,这可能是个问题。
其他回答
如果你知道表的数量和它们的名称,并且假设它们每个都有主键,你可以使用交叉连接结合COUNT(distinct [column])来获得来自每个表的行:
SELECT
COUNT(distinct t1.id) +
COUNT(distinct t2.id) +
COUNT(distinct t3.id) AS totalRows
FROM firstTable t1, secondTable t2, thirdTable t3;
下面是一个SQL Fiddle的例子。
像@Venkatramanan和其他人一样,我找到了INFORMATION_SCHEMA。TABLES不可靠(使用InnoDB, MySQL 5.1.44),每次运行时给出不同的行数,即使是在静态表上。这里有一种生成大型SQL语句的相对hack(但是灵活/适应性强)的方法,您可以将其粘贴到新的查询中,而不需要安装Ruby宝石之类的东西。
SELECT CONCAT(
'SELECT "',
table_name,
'" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM `',
table_schema,
'`.`',
table_name,
'` UNION '
)
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE table_schema = '**my_schema**';
它产生如下输出:
SELECT "func" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM my_schema.func UNION
SELECT "general_log" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM my_schema.general_log UNION
SELECT "help_category" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM my_schema.help_category UNION
SELECT "help_keyword" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM my_schema.help_keyword UNION
SELECT "help_relation" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM my_schema.help_relation UNION
SELECT "help_topic" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM my_schema.help_topic UNION
SELECT "host" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM my_schema.host UNION
SELECT "ndb_binlog_index" AS table_name, COUNT(*) AS exact_row_count FROM my_schema.ndb_binlog_index UNION
复制粘贴,除了最后一个UNION,可以得到漂亮的输出,
+------------------+-----------------+
| table_name | exact_row_count |
+------------------+-----------------+
| func | 0 |
| general_log | 0 |
| help_category | 37 |
| help_keyword | 450 |
| help_relation | 990 |
| help_topic | 504 |
| host | 0 |
| ndb_binlog_index | 0 |
+------------------+-----------------+
8 rows in set (0.01 sec)
海报想要行计数,但没有指定哪个表引擎。对于InnoDB,我只知道一种方法,那就是计数。
我是这样摘土豆的:
# Put this function in your bash and call with:
# rowpicker DBUSER DBPASS DBNAME [TABLEPATTERN]
function rowpicker() {
UN=$1
PW=$2
DB=$3
if [ ! -z "$4" ]; then
PAT="LIKE '$4'"
tot=-2
else
PAT=""
tot=-1
fi
for t in `mysql -u "$UN" -p"$PW" "$DB" -e "SHOW TABLES $PAT"`;do
if [ $tot -lt 0 ]; then
echo "Skipping $t";
let "tot += 1";
else
c=`mysql -u "$UN" -p"$PW" "$DB" -e "SELECT count(*) FROM $t"`;
c=`echo $c | cut -d " " -f 2`;
echo "$t: $c";
let "tot += c";
fi;
done;
echo "total rows: $tot"
}
我对此没有任何断言,只是说这是一种非常丑陋但有效的方法,可以获得数据库中每个表中存在多少行,而不需要使用表引擎,也不需要拥有安装存储过程的权限,也不需要安装ruby或php。是的,生锈了。是的,这很重要。Count(*)是准确的。
像许多其他人一样,我很难用InnoDB在INFORMATION_SCHEMA表上获得准确的值,并且能够通过count()进行查询将无限受益,并且希望在一次查询中完成它。
首先,确保启用大规模group_concats:
SET SESSION group_concat_max_len = 1000000;
然后运行此查询以获得将为数据库运行的结果查询。
SELECT CONCAT('SELECT ', GROUP_CONCAT(table1.count SEPARATOR ',\n')) FROM (
SELECT concat('(SELECT count(id) AS \'',table_name,' Count\' ','FROM ',table_name,') AS ',table_name,'_Count') AS 'count'
FROM information_schema.tables
WHERE table_schema = '**YOUR_DATABASE_HERE**'
) AS table1
这将生成诸如…
SELECT (SELECT count(id) AS 'table1 Count' FROM table1) AS table1_Count,
(SELECT count(id) AS 'table2 Count' FROM table2) AS table2_Count,
(SELECT count(id) AS 'table3 Count' FROM table3) AS table3_Count;
这反过来又产生了以下结果:
*************************** 1. row ***************************
table1_Count: 1
table2_Count: 1
table3_Count: 0
下面的代码为所有故事生成选择查询。只需删除最后的“UNION ALL”选择所有结果,并粘贴一个新的查询窗口运行。
SELECT
concat('select ''', table_name ,''' as TableName, COUNT(*) as RowCount from ' , table_name , ' UNION ALL ') as TR FROM
information_schema.tables where
table_schema = 'Database Name'
推荐文章
- 如何关闭mysql密码验证?
- 如何在Ruby On Rails中使用NuoDB手动执行SQL命令
- 查询JSON类型内的数组元素
- 确定记录是否存在的最快方法
- MySQL区分大小写查询
- 获得PostgreSQL数据库中当前连接数的正确查询
- 在SQL选择语句Order By 1的目的是什么?
- MySQL数据库表中的最大记录数
- 原则-如何打印出真正的sql,而不仅仅是准备好的语句?
- PHP/MySQL插入一行然后获取id
- 我如何循环通过一组记录在SQL Server?
- 如何从命令行通过mysql运行一个查询?
- 外键约束可能导致循环或多条级联路径?
- 使用LIMIT/OFFSET运行查询,还可以获得总行数
- 当恢复sql时,psql无效命令\N