如果目录不存在,下面的方法是否正确?

它应该对脚本具有完全的权限,并且其他人可以阅读。

var dir = __dirname + '/upload';
if (!path.existsSync(dir)) {
    fs.mkdirSync(dir, 0744);
}

当前回答

解决方案

CommonJS

const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');

const dir = path.resolve(path.join(__dirname, 'upload');

if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
  fs.mkdirSync(dir);
}

// OR
if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
  fs.mkdirSync(dir, {
    mode: 0o744, // Not supported on Windows. Default: 0o777
  });
}

ESM

更新您的包。Json文件配置

{
  // declare using ECMAScript modules(ESM)
  "type": "module",
  //...
}
import fs from 'fs';
import path from 'path';
import { fileURLToPath } from 'url';

// create one custom `__dirname`, because it does not exist in es-module env ⚠️
const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);
const __dirname = path.dirname(__filename);
const dir = path.resolve(path.join(__dirname, 'upload');

if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
  fs.mkdirSync(dir);
}

// OR
if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
  fs.mkdirSync(dir, {
    mode: 0o744, // Not supported on Windows. Default: 0o777
  });
}

更新2022

import { existsSync } from 'node:fs';

refs

NodeJS版本:v18.2.0

https://nodejs.org/api/fs.html#fsexistssyncpath

https://nodejs.org/api/fs.html#fsmkdirsyncpath-options

https://nodejs.org/api/url.html#urlfileurltopathurl

https://github.com/nodejs/help/issues/2907#issuecomment-757446568

ESM: ECMAScript模块

https://nodejs.org/api/esm.html#introduction

其他回答

var dir = 'path/to/dir';
try {
  fs.mkdirSync(dir);
} catch(e) {
  if (e.code != 'EEXIST') throw e;
}

异步执行此操作的函数(从使用同步函数的SO上的类似答案调整,我现在找不到)

// ensure-directory.js
import { mkdir, access } from 'fs'

/**
 * directoryPath is a path to a directory (no trailing file!)
 */
export default async directoryPath => {
  directoryPath = directoryPath.replace(/\\/g, '/')

  // -- preparation to allow absolute paths as well
  let root = ''
  if (directoryPath[0] === '/') {
    root = '/'
    directoryPath = directoryPath.slice(1)
  } else if (directoryPath[1] === ':') {
    root = directoryPath.slice(0, 3) // c:\
    directoryPath = directoryPath.slice(3)
  }

  // -- create folders all the way down
  const folders = directoryPath.split('/')
  let folderPath = `${root}`
  for (const folder of folders) {
    folderPath = `${folderPath}${folder}/`

    const folderExists = await new Promise(resolve =>
      access(folderPath, error => {
        if (error) {
          resolve(false)
        }
        resolve(true)
      })
    )

    if (!folderExists) {
      await new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
        mkdir(folderPath, error => {
          if (error) {
            reject('Error creating folderPath')
          }
          resolve(folderPath)
        })
      )
    }
  }
}

使用async / await:

const mkdirP = async (directory) => {
  try {
    return await fs.mkdirAsync(directory);
  } catch (error) {
    if (error.code != 'EEXIST') {
      throw e;
    }
  }
};

你需要承诺fs:

import nodeFs from 'fs';
import bluebird from 'bluebird';

const fs = bluebird.promisifyAll(nodeFs);

从文档中可以看出,这是你异步(和递归)做这件事的方式:

const fs = require('fs');
const fsPromises = fs.promises;

fsPromises.access(dir, fs.constants.F_OK)
   .catch(async() => {
                await fs.mkdir(dir, { recursive: true }, function(err) {
                    if (err) {
                      console.log(err)
                    }
                  })
    });

我的解决方案

CommonJS


var fs = require("fs");

var dir = __dirname + '/upload';

// if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
//   fs.mkdirSync(dir);
// }

if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
  fs.mkdirSync(dir, {
    mode: 0o744,
  });
  // mode's default value is 0o744
}

ESM

更新包。json配置

{
  //...
  "type": "module",
  //...
}
import fs from "fs";
import path from "path";

// create one custom `__dirname`, because it not exist in es-module env ⚠️
const __dirname = path.resolve();

const dir = __dirname + '/upload';

if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
  fs.mkdirSync(dir);
}

// OR
if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) {
  fs.mkdirSync(dir, {
    mode: 0o744,
  });
  // mode's default value is 0o744
}

refs

https://nodejs.org/api/fs.html#fsexistssyncpath

https://github.com/nodejs/help/issues/2907#issuecomment-671782092