我本人也有这个问题(在更换阵列是可以接受的情况下),

var filteredItems = this.items.filter(function (i) {
    return i !== item;
});

要给上面的片段略加上下文:

self.thingWithItems = {
    items: [],
    removeItem: function (item) {
        var filteredItems = this.items.filter(function (i) {
            return i !== item;
        });

        this.items = filteredItems;
    }
};

此解决方案应该同时使用引用项和值项。 它都取决于您是否需要保持对原始数组的引用, 以判断该解决方案是否适用 。

删除上次的元素

arrName.pop();

删除第一个元素

arrName.shift();

从中间删除

arrName.splice(starting index, number of element you wnt to delete);

Example: arrName.splice(1, 1);

删除最后一个元素

arrName.splice(-1);

使用数组索引编号删除

 delete arrName[1];

 (function removeFromArrayPolyfill() {
      if (window.Array.prototype.remove) return;
    
      Array.prototype.remove = function (value) {
        if (!this.length || !value) return;
    
        const indexOfValue = this.indexOf(value);
    
        if (indexOfValue >= 0) {
          this.splice(indexOfValue, 1);
        }
      };
    })();
    
    // testing polyfill
    const nums = [10, 20, 30];
    nums.remove(20);
    console.log(nums);//[10,30]

我知道答案已经很多了,但其中许多答案似乎都使问题复杂化了。这是一个简单的、循环性的方法,可以删除所有键的所有例子——在找不到索引之前自调键,直到找不到索引。是的,它只在浏览器中起作用。indexOf,但它很简单,并且很容易被多填填充。

独立职能

function removeAll(array, key){
    var index = array.indexOf(key);

    if(index === -1) return;

    array.splice(index, 1);
    removeAll(array,key);
}

原型方法

Array.prototype.removeAll = function(key){
    var index = this.indexOf(key);

    if(index === -1) return;

    this.splice(index, 1);
    this.removeAll(key);
}

Vanilla JavaScript(ES5.1) - (ES5.1) -已经到位版本版本

浏览器支持 :因特网探索者 9或以后(或以后(详细浏览器支持)

/**
 * Removes all occurences of the item from the array.
 *
 * Modifies the array “in place”, i.e. the array passed as an argument
 * is modified as opposed to creating a new array. Also returns the modified
 * array for your convenience.
 */
function removeInPlace(array, item) {
    var foundIndex, fromIndex;

    // Look for the item (the item can have multiple indices)
    fromIndex = array.length - 1;
    foundIndex = array.lastIndexOf(item, fromIndex);

    while (foundIndex !== -1) {
        // Remove the item (in place)
        array.splice(foundIndex, 1);

        // Bookkeeping
        fromIndex = foundIndex - 1;
        foundIndex = array.lastIndexOf(item, fromIndex);
    }

    // Return the modified array
    return array;
}

Vanilla JavaScript(ES5.1) - (ES5.1) -不可变版本版本

浏览器支持: 与原版的香草 JavaScript 相同

/**
 * Removes all occurences of the item from the array.
 *
 * Returns a new array with all the items of the original array except
 * the specified item.
 */
function remove(array, item) {
    var arrayCopy;

    arrayCopy = array.slice();

    return removeInPlace(arrayCopy, item);
}

香草ES6 -不可变版本版本

浏览器支持: Chrome 46, 边缘 12, Firefox 16, Opera 37, Safari 8 ()详细浏览器支持)

/**
 * Removes all occurences of the item from the array.
 *
 * Returns a new array with all the items of the original array except
 * the specified item.
 */
function remove(array, item) {
    // Copy the array
    array = [...array];

    // Look for the item (the item can have multiple indices)
    let fromIndex = array.length - 1;
    let foundIndex = array.lastIndexOf(item, fromIndex);

    while (foundIndex !== -1) {
        // Remove the item by generating a new array without it
        array = [
            ...array.slice(0, foundIndex),
            ...array.slice(foundIndex + 1),
        ];

        // Bookkeeping
        fromIndex = foundIndex - 1;
        foundIndex = array.lastIndexOf(item, fromIndex)
    }

    // Return the new array
    return array;
}

根据所有主要正确的答复并考虑到建议的最佳做法(特别是不直接使用Array.prototype),我提出了以下代码:

function arrayWithout(arr, values) {
  var isArray = function(canBeArray) {
    if (Array.isArray) {
      return Array.isArray(canBeArray);
    }
    return Object.prototype.toString.call(canBeArray) === '[object Array]';
  };

  var excludedValues = (isArray(values)) ? values : [].slice.call(arguments, 1);
  var arrCopy = arr.slice(0);

  for (var i = arrCopy.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
    if (excludedValues.indexOf(arrCopy[i]) > -1) {
      arrCopy.splice(i, 1);
    }
  }

  return arrCopy;
}

在审查上述功能时,尽管运作良好,但我意识到业绩可能有所改进。 使用ES6而不是ES5是一种更好的方法。

const arrayWithoutFastest = (() => {
  const isArray = canBeArray => ('isArray' in Array) 
    ? Array.isArray(canBeArray) 
    : Object.prototype.toString.call(canBeArray) === '[object Array]';

  let mapIncludes = (map, key) => map.has(key);
  let objectIncludes = (obj, key) => key in obj;
  let includes;

  function arrayWithoutFastest(arr, ...thisArgs) {
    let withoutValues = isArray(thisArgs[0]) ? thisArgs[0] : thisArgs;

    if (typeof Map !== 'undefined') {
      withoutValues = withoutValues.reduce((map, value) => map.set(value, value), new Map());
      includes = mapIncludes;
    } else {
      withoutValues = withoutValues.reduce((map, value) => { map[value] = value; return map; } , {}); 
      includes = objectIncludes;
    }

    const arrCopy = [];
    const length = arr.length;

    for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
      // If value is not in exclude list
      if (!includes(withoutValues, arr[i])) {
        arrCopy.push(arr[i]);
      }
    }

    return arrCopy;
  }

  return arrayWithoutFastest;  
})();

如何使用 :

const arr = [1,2,3,4,5,"name", false];

arrayWithoutFastest(arr, 1); // will return array [2,3,4,5,"name", false]
arrayWithoutFastest(arr, 'name'); // will return [2,3,4,5, false]
arrayWithoutFastest(arr, false); // will return [2,3,4,5]
arrayWithoutFastest(arr,[1,2]); // will return [3,4,5,"name", false];
arrayWithoutFastest(arr, {bar: "foo"}); // will return the same array (new copy)

我目前正在写博客文章, 其中我已设定数个无问题的阵列解决方案基准, 并比较运行时间。 一旦我完成此文章, 我将更新此答案, 并用链接更新。 仅供参考, 我比较了上述与没有 Lodash 的比较, 以防浏览器支持Map注意我没有用Array.prototype.indexOf或Array.prototype.includes将exlcude Values 包装在Map或Object让查询更快!