我已经完成了上述所有解决方案，它们都很好。然而，您可以使用另一种方法来克隆对象（值不引用）。对象分配

let x = {
    a: '1',
    b: '2'
}

let y = Object.assign({}, x)
y.a = "3"

console.log(x)

输出将为

{ a: '1', b: '2' }

此外，您还可以使用相同的方法克隆阵列。

clonedArray = Object.assign([], array)

复制对象最正确的方法是使用object.create：

Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(obj), Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(obj));

这样的符号将使相同的对象具有正确的原型和隐藏的财产。

您可以简单地使用扩展属性来复制没有引用的对象。但是要小心（请参见注释），“副本”仅位于最低的对象/数组级别。嵌套的财产仍然是引用！

完整克隆：

let x = {a: 'value1'}
let x2 = {...x}

// => mutate without references:

x2.a = 'value2'
console.log(x.a)    // => 'value1'

在第二级克隆引用：

const y = {a: {b: 'value3'}}
const y2 = {...y}

// => nested object is still a references:

y2.a.b = 'value4'
console.log(y.a.b)    // => 'value4'

JavaScript实际上不支持本地深度克隆。使用效用函数。例如Ramda：

http://ramdajs.com/docs/#clone

复制最终可能指向自身的对象的问题可以通过简单的检查来解决。每次有复制操作时，添加此复选框。它可能很慢，但应该会起作用。

我使用toType（）函数显式返回对象类型。我也有自己的copyObj（）函数，它在逻辑上非常相似，可以回答所有三种Object（）、Array（）和Date（）情况。

我在NodeJS中运行它。

尚未测试。

// Returns true, if one of the parent's children is the target.
// This is useful, for avoiding copyObj() through an infinite loop!
function isChild(target, parent) {
  if (toType(parent) == '[object Object]') {
    for (var name in parent) {
      var curProperty = parent[name];

      // Direct child.
      if (curProperty = target) return true;

      // Check if target is a child of this property, and so on, recursively.
      if (toType(curProperty) == '[object Object]' || toType(curProperty) == '[object Array]') {
        if (isChild(target, curProperty)) return true;
      }
    }
  } else if (toType(parent) == '[object Array]') {
    for (var i=0; i < parent.length; i++) {
      var curItem = parent[i];

      // Direct child.
      if (curItem = target) return true;

      // Check if target is a child of this property, and so on, recursively.
      if (toType(curItem) == '[object Object]' || toType(curItem) == '[object Array]') {
        if (isChild(target, curItem)) return true;
      }
    }
  }

  return false;     // Not the target.
}

本文来自Brian Huisman的《如何在Javascript中复制数组和对象》：

Object.prototype.clone = function() {
  var newObj = (this instanceof Array) ? [] : {};
  for (var i in this) {
    if (i == 'clone') continue;
    if (this[i] && typeof this[i] == "object") {
      newObj[i] = this[i].clone();
    } else newObj[i] = this[i]
  } return newObj;
};

这是对A.Levy代码的修改，以处理函数和多个/循环引用的克隆。这意味着，如果克隆的树中的两个财产是同一对象的引用，则克隆的对象树将使这些财产指向被引用对象的同一克隆。这也解决了循环依赖性的问题，如果不加以处理，就会导致无限循环。算法的复杂度为O（n）

function clone(obj){
    var clonedObjectsArray = [];
    var originalObjectsArray = []; //used to remove the unique ids when finished
    var next_objid = 0;

    function objectId(obj) {
        if (obj == null) return null;
        if (obj.__obj_id == undefined){
            obj.__obj_id = next_objid++;
            originalObjectsArray[obj.__obj_id] = obj;
        }
        return obj.__obj_id;
    }

    function cloneRecursive(obj) {
        if (null == obj || typeof obj == "string" || typeof obj == "number" || typeof obj == "boolean") return obj;

        // Handle Date
        if (obj instanceof Date) {
            var copy = new Date();
            copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Array
        if (obj instanceof Array) {
            var copy = [];
            for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; ++i) {
                copy[i] = cloneRecursive(obj[i]);
            }
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Object
        if (obj instanceof Object) {
            if (clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] != undefined)
                return clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)];

            var copy;
            if (obj instanceof Function)//Handle Function
                copy = function(){return obj.apply(this, arguments);};
            else
                copy = {};

            clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] = copy;

            for (var attr in obj)
                if (attr != "__obj_id" && obj.hasOwnProperty(attr))
                    copy[attr] = cloneRecursive(obj[attr]);                 

            return copy;
        }       


        throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
    }
    var cloneObj = cloneRecursive(obj);



    //remove the unique ids
    for (var i = 0; i < originalObjectsArray.length; i++)
    {
        delete originalObjectsArray[i].__obj_id;
    };

    return cloneObj;
}

一些快速测试

var auxobj = {
    prop1 : "prop1 aux val", 
    prop2 : ["prop2 item1", "prop2 item2"]
    };

var obj = new Object();
obj.prop1 = "prop1_value";
obj.prop2 = [auxobj, auxobj, "some extra val", undefined];
obj.nr = 3465;
obj.bool = true;

obj.f1 = function (){
    this.prop1 = "prop1 val changed by f1";
};

objclone = clone(obj);

//some tests i've made
console.log("test number, boolean and string cloning: " + (objclone.prop1 == obj.prop1 && objclone.nr == obj.nr && objclone.bool == obj.bool));

objclone.f1();
console.log("test function cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop1 == 'prop1 val changed by f1'));
objclone.f1.prop = 'some prop';
console.log("test function cloning 2: " + (obj.f1.prop == undefined));

objclone.prop2[0].prop1 = "prop1 aux val NEW";
console.log("test multiple references cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 == objclone.prop2[0].prop1));
console.log("test multiple references cloning 2: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 != obj.prop2[0].prop1));