试着这样做:

int **ary = new int* [sizeY];
for (int i = 0; i < sizeY; i++)
    ary[i] = new int[sizeX];

我使用这个不优雅，但快速，简单和工作系统。我不明白为什么不能工作，因为系统允许创建一个大尺寸数组和访问部分的唯一方法是不切割它的部分:

#define DIM 3
#define WORMS 50000 //gusanos

void halla_centros_V000(double CENW[][DIM])
{
    CENW[i][j]=...
    ...
}


int main()
{
    double *CENW_MEM=new double[WORMS*DIM];
    double (*CENW)[DIM];
    CENW=(double (*)[3]) &CENW_MEM[0];
    halla_centros_V000(CENW);
    delete[] CENW_MEM;
}

在某些情况下，我给你留下了一个最适合我的解决方案。特别是如果一个人知道[的大小?数组的一维。对于字符数组非常有用，例如，如果我们需要一个大小不同的字符数组[20]。

int  size = 1492;
char (*array)[20];

array = new char[size][20];
...
strcpy(array[5], "hola!");
...
delete [] array;

键是数组声明中的括号。

在c++ 11中可以:

auto array = new double[M][N]; 

这样，内存就不会被初始化。要初始化它，可以这样做:

auto array = new double[M][N]();

示例程序(用"g++ -std=c++11"编译):

#include <iostream>
#include <utility>
#include <type_traits>
#include <typeinfo>
#include <cxxabi.h>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
    const auto M = 2;
    const auto N = 2;

    // allocate (no initializatoin)
    auto array = new double[M][N];

    // pollute the memory
    array[0][0] = 2;
    array[1][0] = 3;
    array[0][1] = 4;
    array[1][1] = 5;

    // re-allocate, probably will fetch the same memory block (not portable)
    delete[] array;
    array = new double[M][N];

    // show that memory is not initialized
    for(int r = 0; r < M; r++)
    {
        for(int c = 0; c < N; c++)
            cout << array[r][c] << " ";
        cout << endl;
    }
    cout << endl;

    delete[] array;

    // the proper way to zero-initialize the array
    array = new double[M][N]();

    // show the memory is initialized
    for(int r = 0; r < M; r++)
    {
        for(int c = 0; c < N; c++)
            cout << array[r][c] << " ";
        cout << endl;
    }

    int info;
    cout << abi::__cxa_demangle(typeid(array).name(),0,0,&info) << endl;

    return 0;
}

输出:

2 4 
3 5 

0 0 
0 0 
double (*) [2]

Typedef是你的朋友

在回顾并查看了许多其他答案之后，我发现需要进行更深层次的解释，因为许多其他答案要么存在性能问题，要么迫使您使用不寻常的或繁重的语法来声明数组，或访问数组元素(或以上所有问题)。

首先，这个答案假设您在编译时知道数组的尺寸。如果你这样做，那么这是最好的解决方案，因为它将提供最好的性能，并允许您使用标准数组语法来访问数组元素。

The reason this gives the best performance is because it allocates all of the arrays as a contiguous block of memory meaning that you are likely to have less page misses and better spacial locality. Allocating in a loop may cause the individual arrays to end up scattered on multiple non-contiguous pages through the virtual memory space as the allocation loop could be interrupted ( possibly multiple times ) by other threads or processes, or simply due to the discretion of the allocator filling in small, empty memory blocks it happens to have available.

其他好处是声明语法简单，数组访问语法标准。

在c++中使用new:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv) {

typedef double (array5k_t)[5000];

array5k_t *array5k = new array5k_t[5000];

array5k[4999][4999] = 10;
printf("array5k[4999][4999] == %f\n", array5k[4999][4999]);

return 0;
}

或使用calloc的C样式:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv) {

typedef double (*array5k_t)[5000];

array5k_t array5k = calloc(5000, sizeof(double)*5000);

array5k[4999][4999] = 10;
printf("array5k[4999][4999] == %f\n", array5k[4999][4999]);

return 0;
}

int** ary = new int[sizeY][sizeX]

应该是:

int **ary = new int*[sizeY];
for(int i = 0; i < sizeY; ++i) {
    ary[i] = new int[sizeX];
}

然后清理是:

for(int i = 0; i < sizeY; ++i) {
    delete [] ary[i];
}
delete [] ary;

编辑:正如Dietrich Epp在评论中指出的那样，这并不是一个轻量级的解决方案。另一种方法是使用一个大内存块:

int *ary = new int[sizeX*sizeY];

// ary[i][j] is then rewritten as
ary[i*sizeY+j]