另一个变体(它在IE中工作吗?):

String.prototype.reverse = function() {
    for (i=1,s=""; i<=this.length; s+=this.substr(-i++,1)) {}
    return s;
}

编辑:

这是不使用内置函数的:

String.prototype.reverse = function() {
    for (i=this[-1],s=""; i>=0; s+=this[i--]) {}
    return s;
}

注意:this[-1]保存字符串的长度。

然而，不可能将字符串反向，因为赋值给 单个数组元素不能与String对象(protected?)一起工作。也就是说，你可以赋值，但结果字符串不会改变。

真正的答案是:你不能把它颠倒过来，但是你可以创建一个颠倒过来的新字符串。

Just as an exercise to play with recursion: sometimes when you go to an interview, the interviewer may ask you how to do this using recursion, and I think the "preferred answer" might be "I would rather not do this in recursion as it can easily cause a stack overflow" (because it is O(n) rather than O(log n). If it is O(log n), it is quite difficult to get a stack overflow -- 4 billion items could be handled by a stack level of 32, as 2 ** 32 is 4294967296. But if it is O(n), then it can easily get a stack overflow.

有时候面试官还是会问你，“作为练习，你为什么不用递归来写呢?”就是这样:

String.prototype.reverse = function() {
    if (this.length <= 1) return this;
    else return this.slice(1).reverse() + this.slice(0,1);
}

测试运行:

var s = "";
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    s += ("apple" + i);
}
console.log(s.reverse());

输出:

999elppa899elppa...2elppa1elppa0elppa

为了尝试获得堆栈溢出，我在谷歌Chrome中将1000更改为10000，它报告:

RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

在ECMAScript 6中，你可以在不使用.split(") split方法的情况下更快地反转字符串，展开操作符如下所示:

var str = [...'racecar'].reverse().join('');

//recursive implementation
function reverse(wrd) {
  const str =wrd[0]
  if(!wrd.length) {
    return wrd
  }
  return reverse(wrd.slice(1)) + str
}

添加的反向字符串没有循环，它是通过递归工作。

函数反向(y) { 如果(y)。Length ==1 || . Length == 0){ 返回y; ｝ 返回y.split(”)[y。长度- 1]+反向(y。片(0,y.length-1)); ｝ console.log(反向(“Hello”));

保持干燥和简单，傻!!

function reverse(s){
let str = s;
var reverse = '';
for (var i=str.length;i>0;i--){

    var newstr = str.substring(0,i)
    reverse += newstr.substr(-1,1)
}
return reverse;
}