我今天看到了一个很好的例子，从这篇博客文章，我总结如下。

假设您有一个链表中节点的结构，可能是这样

typedef struct node
{
    struct node * next;
    ....
} node;

现在您想实现一个remove_if函数，它接受删除条件rm作为参数之一，并遍历链表:如果一个条目满足该条件(例如rm(entry)==true)，它的节点将从链表中删除。最后，remove_if返回链表的头(可能与原始头不同)。

你可以写信

for (node * prev = NULL, * curr = head; curr != NULL; )
{
    node * const next = curr->next;
    if (rm(curr))
    {
        if (prev)  // the node to be removed is not the head
            prev->next = next;
        else       // remove the head
            head = next;
        free(curr);
    }
    else
        prev = curr;
    curr = next;
}

就像你的for循环。这里的信息是，如果没有双指针，您必须维护一个prev变量来重新组织指针，并处理两种不同的情况。

但是使用双指针，你实际上可以写

// now head is a double pointer
for (node** curr = head; *curr; )
{
    node * entry = *curr;
    if (rm(entry))
    {
        *curr = entry->next;
        free(entry);
    }
    else
        curr = &entry->next;
}

你现在不需要一个prev，因为你可以直接修改什么prev->next指向。

为了使事情更清楚，让我们稍微跟随一下代码。拆卸过程中:

如果entry ==* head:它将是*head (==*curr) =* head->next - head现在指向新标题节点的指针。您可以通过直接将head的内容更改为一个新的指针来实现这一点。 如果entry != *head:类似地，*curr是prev->next所指向的，现在指向entry->next。

无论哪种情况，您都可以使用双指针以统一的方式重新组织指针。

例如，如果您想随机访问不连续的数据。

p -> [p0, p1, p2, ...]  
p0 -> data1
p1 -> data2

——用C

T ** p = (T **) malloc(sizeof(T*) * n);
p[0] = (T*) malloc(sizeof(T));
p[1] = (T*) malloc(sizeof(T));

存储一个指针p，它指向一个指针数组。每个指针指向一段数据。

如果sizeof(T)很大，则可能无法分配sizeof(T) * n字节的连续块(即使用malloc)。

例如，你可能想要确保当你释放某个东西的内存时，你将指针设置为空。

void safeFree(void** memory) {
    if (*memory) {
        free(*memory);
        *memory = NULL;
    }
}

当你调用这个函数时，你会用指针的地址来调用它

void* myMemory = someCrazyFunctionThatAllocatesMemory();
safeFree(&myMemory);

现在myMemory被设置为NULL，任何重用它的尝试都将是非常明显的错误。

添加到Asha的响应，如果你使用单个指针指向下面的例子(例如alloc1())，你将失去对函数内部分配的内存的引用。

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void alloc2(int** p) {
    *p = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int));
    **p = 10;
}

void alloc1(int* p) {
    p = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int));
    *p = 10;
}

int main(){
    int *p = NULL;
    alloc1(p);
    //printf("%d ",*p);//undefined
    alloc2(&p);
    printf("%d ",*p);//will print 10
    free(p);
    return 0;
}

发生这种情况的原因是在alloc1中，指针是按值传入的。因此，当它被重新分配给alloc1内部的malloc调用的结果时，更改不属于不同作用域中的代码。

I have used double pointers today while I was programming something for work, so I can answer why we had to use them (it's the first time I actually had to use double pointers). We had to deal with real time encoding of frames contained in buffers which are members of some structures. In the encoder we had to use a pointer to one of those structures. The problem was that our pointer was being changed to point to other structures from another thread. In order to use the current structure in the encoder, I had to use a double pointer, in order to point to the pointer that was being modified in another thread. It wasn't obvious at first, at least for us, that we had to take this approach. A lot of address were printed in the process :)).

当你处理在应用程序其他地方被更改的指针时，你应该使用双指针。在处理返回和寻址给您的硬件时，您可能还会发现双指针是必须的。

如果你想要一个字符列表(一个单词)，你可以使用char *word

如果你想要一个单词列表(一个句子)，你可以使用char **句子

如果你想要一个句子列表(独白)，你可以使用char ***monologue

如果你想要一个独白列表(传记)，你可以使用char ****传记

如果你想要一个传记列表(一个生物图书馆)，你可以使用char *****biolibrary

如果你想要一个生物库列表(a ??lol)，你可以使用char ******lol

……

是的，我知道这些可能不是最好的数据结构

一个非常非常非常无聊的lol的用法例子

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

int wordsinsentence(char **x) {
    int w = 0;
    while (*x) {
        w += 1;
        x++;
    }
    return w;
}

int wordsinmono(char ***x) {
    int w = 0;
    while (*x) {
        w += wordsinsentence(*x);
        x++;
    }
    return w;
}

int wordsinbio(char ****x) {
    int w = 0;
    while (*x) {
        w += wordsinmono(*x);
        x++;
    }
    return w;
}

int wordsinlib(char *****x) {
    int w = 0;
    while (*x) {
        w += wordsinbio(*x);
        x++;
    }
    return w;
}

int wordsinlol(char ******x) {
    int w = 0;
    while (*x) {
        w += wordsinlib(*x);
        x++;
    }
    return w;
}

int main(void) {
    char *word;
    char **sentence;
    char ***monologue;
    char ****biography;
    char *****biolibrary;
    char ******lol;

    //fill data structure
    word = malloc(4 * sizeof *word); // assume it worked
    strcpy(word, "foo");

    sentence = malloc(4 * sizeof *sentence); // assume it worked
    sentence[0] = word;
    sentence[1] = word;
    sentence[2] = word;
    sentence[3] = NULL;

    monologue = malloc(4 * sizeof *monologue); // assume it worked
    monologue[0] = sentence;
    monologue[1] = sentence;
    monologue[2] = sentence;
    monologue[3] = NULL;

    biography = malloc(4 * sizeof *biography); // assume it worked
    biography[0] = monologue;
    biography[1] = monologue;
    biography[2] = monologue;
    biography[3] = NULL;

    biolibrary = malloc(4 * sizeof *biolibrary); // assume it worked
    biolibrary[0] = biography;
    biolibrary[1] = biography;
    biolibrary[2] = biography;
    biolibrary[3] = NULL;

    lol = malloc(4 * sizeof *lol); // assume it worked
    lol[0] = biolibrary;
    lol[1] = biolibrary;
    lol[2] = biolibrary;
    lol[3] = NULL;

    printf("total words in my lol: %d\n", wordsinlol(lol));

    free(lol);
    free(biolibrary);
    free(biography);
    free(monologue);
    free(sentence);
    free(word);
}

输出:

total words in my lol: 243