我认为，如果你需要规范化的数据表-你需要尝试一些其他的数据库解决方案。

但是我在Git上找到了MOngo的解决方案 顺便说一下，在插入代码-它有电影的名称，但没有电影的ID。

问题

你有一个演员集合和他们所做的电影数组。

您希望生成一个Movies集合，每个Movies中都包含一个actor数组。

一些示例数据

 db.actors.insert( { actor: "Richard Gere", movies: ['Pretty Woman', 'Runaway Bride', 'Chicago'] });
 db.actors.insert( { actor: "Julia Roberts", movies: ['Pretty Woman', 'Runaway Bride', 'Erin Brockovich'] });

解决方案

我们需要循环遍历Actor文档中的每个电影，并分别发出每个电影。

这里的问题是在减少阶段。我们不能从reduce阶段发出一个数组，因此必须在返回的“value”文档中构建一个Actors数组。

The code

map = function() {
  for(var i in this.movies){
    key = { movie: this.movies[i] };
    value = { actors: [ this.actor ] };
    emit(key, value);
  }
}

reduce = function(key, values) {
  actor_list = { actors: [] };
  for(var i in values) {
    actor_list.actors = values[i].actors.concat(actor_list.actors);
  }
  return actor_list;
}

注意，actor_list实际上是一个包含数组的javascript对象。还要注意map发出相同的结构。

执行以下命令执行map / reduce，将其输出到“pivot”集合并打印结果:

printjson (db.actors。mapReduce(map, reduce， "pivot")); db.pivot.find () .forEach (printjson);

以下是输出示例，请注意《风月俏佳人》和《逃跑新娘》中都有“理查德·基尔”和“茱莉亚·罗伯茨”。

{ "_id" : { "movie" : "Chicago" }, "value" : { "actors" : [ "Richard Gere" ] } }
{ "_id" : { "movie" : "Erin Brockovich" }, "value" : { "actors" : [ "Julia Roberts" ] } }
{ "_id" : { "movie" : "Pretty Woman" }, "value" : { "actors" : [ "Richard Gere", "Julia Roberts" ] } }
{ "_id" : { "movie" : "Runaway Bride" }, "value" : { "actors" : [ "Richard Gere", "Julia Roberts" ] } }

---

我认为，如果你需要规范化的数据表-你需要尝试一些其他的数据库解决方案。

但是我在Git上找到了MOngo的解决方案 顺便说一下，在插入代码-它有电影的名称，但没有电影的ID。

问题

你有一个演员集合和他们所做的电影数组。

您希望生成一个Movies集合，每个Movies中都包含一个actor数组。

一些示例数据

 db.actors.insert( { actor: "Richard Gere", movies: ['Pretty Woman', 'Runaway Bride', 'Chicago'] });
 db.actors.insert( { actor: "Julia Roberts", movies: ['Pretty Woman', 'Runaway Bride', 'Erin Brockovich'] });

解决方案

我们需要循环遍历Actor文档中的每个电影，并分别发出每个电影。

这里的问题是在减少阶段。我们不能从reduce阶段发出一个数组，因此必须在返回的“value”文档中构建一个Actors数组。

The code

map = function() {
  for(var i in this.movies){
    key = { movie: this.movies[i] };
    value = { actors: [ this.actor ] };
    emit(key, value);
  }
}

reduce = function(key, values) {
  actor_list = { actors: [] };
  for(var i in values) {
    actor_list.actors = values[i].actors.concat(actor_list.actors);
  }
  return actor_list;
}

注意，actor_list实际上是一个包含数组的javascript对象。还要注意map发出相同的结构。

执行以下命令执行map / reduce，将其输出到“pivot”集合并打印结果:

printjson (db.actors。mapReduce(map, reduce， "pivot")); db.pivot.find () .forEach (printjson);

以下是输出示例，请注意《风月俏佳人》和《逃跑新娘》中都有“理查德·基尔”和“茱莉亚·罗伯茨”。

{ "_id" : { "movie" : "Chicago" }, "value" : { "actors" : [ "Richard Gere" ] } }
{ "_id" : { "movie" : "Erin Brockovich" }, "value" : { "actors" : [ "Julia Roberts" ] } }
{ "_id" : { "movie" : "Pretty Woman" }, "value" : { "actors" : [ "Richard Gere", "Julia Roberts" ] } }
{ "_id" : { "movie" : "Runaway Bride" }, "value" : { "actors" : [ "Richard Gere", "Julia Roberts" ] } }

---

As others have pointed out you are trying to create a relational database from none relational database which you really don't want to do but anyways, if you have a case that you have to do this here is a solution you can use. We first do a foreach find on collection A( or in your case users) and then we get each item as an object then we use object property (in your case uid) to lookup in our second collection (in your case comments) if we can find it then we have a match and we can print or do something with it. Hope this helps you and good luck :)

db.users.find().forEach(
function (object) {
    var commonInBoth=db.comments.findOne({ "uid": object.uid} );
    if (commonInBoth != null) {
        printjson(commonInBoth) ;
        printjson(object) ;
    }else {
        // did not match so we don't care in this case
    }
});

mongodb官方网站上的这个页面恰好解决了这个问题:

https://mongodb-documentation.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ecosystem/tutorial/model-data-for-ruby-on-rails.html

When we display our list of stories, we'll need to show the name of the user who posted the story. If we were using a relational database, we could perform a join on users and stores, and get all our objects in a single query. But MongoDB does not support joins and so, at times, requires bit of denormalization. Here, this means caching the 'username' attribute. Relational purists may be feeling uneasy already, as if we were violating some universal law. But let’s bear in mind that MongoDB collections are not equivalent to relational tables; each serves a unique design objective. A normalized table provides an atomic, isolated chunk of data. A document, however, more closely represents an object as a whole. In the case of a social news site, it can be argued that a username is intrinsic to the story being posted.

从Mongo 3.2开始，这个问题的答案大多不再正确。添加到聚合管道中的新的$lookup操作符本质上与左外连接相同:

https://docs.mongodb.org/master/reference/operator/aggregation/lookup/#pipe._S_lookup

从文档中可以看出:

{
   $lookup:
     {
       from: <collection to join>,
       localField: <field from the input documents>,
       foreignField: <field from the documents of the "from" collection>,
       as: <output array field>
     }
}

当然，MongoDB不是一个关系数据库，开发人员正在谨慎地推荐$lookup的特定用例，但至少在3.2中，使用MongoDB进行连接是可能的。

查找美元(聚合)

对同一数据库中的未分片集合执行左外连接，以从“已连接”集合中筛选文档进行处理。$查找阶段向每个输入文档添加一个新的数组字段，其元素是“已加入”集合中的匹配文档。$查找阶段将这些重新塑造的文档传递给下一个阶段。 $查找阶段的语法如下:

平等的比赛

要在输入文档中的字段与" joined "集合中的文档中的字段之间执行相等匹配，$lookup stage的语法如下:

{
   $lookup:
     {
       from: <collection to join>,
       localField: <field from the input documents>,
       foreignField: <field from the documents of the "from" collection>,
       as: <output array field>
     }
}

该操作将对应于以下伪sql语句:

SELECT *, <output array field>
FROM collection
WHERE <output array field> IN (SELECT <documents as determined from the pipeline>
                               FROM <collection to join>
                               WHERE <pipeline> );

蒙哥URL