我有一个20 x 4000的数据帧在Python中使用熊猫。其中两列分别命名为Year和quarter。我想创建一个名为period的变量,使Year = 2000, quarter= q2变为2000q2。
有人能帮忙吗?
我有一个20 x 4000的数据帧在Python中使用熊猫。其中两列分别命名为Year和quarter。我想创建一个名为period的变量,使Year = 2000, quarter= q2变为2000q2。
有人能帮忙吗?
当前回答
正如前面提到的,必须将每个列转换为字符串,然后使用加号运算符将两个字符串列合并。使用NumPy可以大大提高性能。
%timeit df['Year'].values.astype(str) + df.quarter
71.1 ms ± 3.76 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
%timeit df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']
565 ms ± 22.3 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
其他回答
类似于@geher的答案,但可以使用任何你喜欢的分隔符:
SEP = " "
INPUT_COLUMNS_WITH_SEP = ",sep,".join(INPUT_COLUMNS).split(",")
df.assign(sep=SEP)[INPUT_COLUMNS_WITH_SEP].sum(axis=1)
小数据集(< 150行)
[''.join(i) for i in zip(df["Year"].map(str),df["quarter"])]
或者稍慢但更紧凑:
df.Year.str.cat(df.quarter)
更大的数据集(> 150rows)
df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']
更新:定时图熊猫0.23.4
让我们在200K行上测试一下:
In [250]: df
Out[250]:
Year quarter
0 2014 q1
1 2015 q2
In [251]: df = pd.concat([df] * 10**5)
In [252]: df.shape
Out[252]: (200000, 2)
更新:新的计时使用熊猫0.19.0
没有CPU/GPU优化的计时(从最快到最慢排序):
In [107]: %timeit df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']
10 loops, best of 3: 131 ms per loop
In [106]: %timeit df['Year'].map(str) + df['quarter']
10 loops, best of 3: 161 ms per loop
In [108]: %timeit df.Year.str.cat(df.quarter)
10 loops, best of 3: 189 ms per loop
In [109]: %timeit df.loc[:, ['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 567 ms per loop
In [110]: %timeit df[['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 584 ms per loop
In [111]: %timeit df[['Year','quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{}{}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 24.7 s per loop
使用CPU/GPU优化计时:
In [113]: %timeit df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']
10 loops, best of 3: 53.3 ms per loop
In [114]: %timeit df['Year'].map(str) + df['quarter']
10 loops, best of 3: 65.5 ms per loop
In [115]: %timeit df.Year.str.cat(df.quarter)
10 loops, best of 3: 79.9 ms per loop
In [116]: %timeit df.loc[:, ['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 230 ms per loop
In [117]: %timeit df[['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 230 ms per loop
In [118]: %timeit df[['Year','quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{}{}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 9.38 s per loop
回答@anton-vbr的贡献
更有效率的是
def concat_df_str1(df):
""" run time: 1.3416s """
return pd.Series([''.join(row.astype(str)) for row in df.values], index=df.index)
下面是一个时间测试:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from time import time
def concat_df_str1(df):
""" run time: 1.3416s """
return pd.Series([''.join(row.astype(str)) for row in df.values], index=df.index)
def concat_df_str2(df):
""" run time: 5.2758s """
return df.astype(str).sum(axis=1)
def concat_df_str3(df):
""" run time: 5.0076s """
df = df.astype(str)
return df[0] + df[1] + df[2] + df[3] + df[4] + \
df[5] + df[6] + df[7] + df[8] + df[9]
def concat_df_str4(df):
""" run time: 7.8624s """
return df.astype(str).apply(lambda x: ''.join(x), axis=1)
def main():
df = pd.DataFrame(np.zeros(1000000).reshape(100000, 10))
df = df.astype(int)
time1 = time()
df_en = concat_df_str4(df)
print('run time: %.4fs' % (time() - time1))
print(df_en.head(10))
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
最后,当使用sum(concat_df_str2)时,结果不是简单的concat,它将转换为整数。
下面是一个我觉得非常通用的实现:
In [1]: import pandas as pd
In [2]: df = pd.DataFrame([[0, 'the', 'quick', 'brown'],
...: [1, 'fox', 'jumps', 'over'],
...: [2, 'the', 'lazy', 'dog']],
...: columns=['c0', 'c1', 'c2', 'c3'])
In [3]: def str_join(df, sep, *cols):
...: from functools import reduce
...: return reduce(lambda x, y: x.astype(str).str.cat(y.astype(str), sep=sep),
...: [df[col] for col in cols])
...:
In [4]: df['cat'] = str_join(df, '-', 'c0', 'c1', 'c2', 'c3')
In [5]: df
Out[5]:
c0 c1 c2 c3 cat
0 0 the quick brown 0-the-quick-brown
1 1 fox jumps over 1-fox-jumps-over
2 2 the lazy dog 2-the-lazy-dog
你可以使用lambda:
combine_lambda = lambda x: '{}{}'.format(x.Year, x.quarter)
然后使用它来创建新列:
df['period'] = df.apply(combine_lambda, axis = 1)