我喜欢这种结束联系的方式:

var client = new ProxyClient();
try
{
    ...
    client.Close();
}
finally
{
    if(client.State != CommunicationState.Closed)
        client.Abort();
}

我终于找到了一些明确解决这个问题的坚实步骤。

This custom tool extends WCFProxyGenerator to provide an exception handling proxy. It generates an additional proxy called ExceptionHandlingProxy<T> which inherits ExceptionHandlingProxyBase<T> - the latter of which implements the meat of the proxy's functionality. The result is that you can choose to use the default proxy that inherits ClientBase<T> or ExceptionHandlingProxy<T> which encapsulates managing the lifetime of the channel factory and channel. ExceptionHandlingProxy respects your selections in the Add Service Reference dialog with respect to asynchronous methods and collection types.

Codeplex有一个名为异常处理WCF代理生成器的项目。它基本上是在Visual Studio 2008中安装一个新的自定义工具，然后使用该工具生成新的服务代理(添加服务引用)。它有一些很好的功能来处理故障通道、超时和安全处理。这里有一个名为ExceptionHandlingProxyWrapper的优秀视频，详细解释了这是如何工作的。

您可以安全地再次使用Using语句，如果通道在任何请求(TimeoutException或CommunicationException)上发生故障，Wrapper将重新初始化故障通道并重试查询。如果失败，它将调用Abort()命令并处理代理并重新抛出异常。如果服务抛出FaultException代码，它将停止执行，代理将按照预期安全抛出正确的异常。

我在这篇文章中提到了一些答案，并根据我的需要定制了它。

我想在使用WCF客户端之前做一些事情，所以使用DoSomethingWithClient()方法。

public interface IServiceClientFactory<T>
{
    T DoSomethingWithClient();
}
public partial class ServiceClient : IServiceClientFactory<ServiceClient>
{
    public ServiceClient DoSomethingWithClient()
    {
        var client = this;
        // do somthing here as set client credentials, etc.
        //client.ClientCredentials = ... ;
        return client;
    }
}

下面是helper类:

public static class Service<TClient>
    where TClient : class, ICommunicationObject, IServiceClientFactory<TClient>, new()
{
    public static TReturn Use<TReturn>(Func<TClient, TReturn> codeBlock)
    {
        TClient client = default(TClient);
        bool success = false;
        try
        {
            client = new TClient().DoSomethingWithClient();
            TReturn result = codeBlock(client);
            client.Close();
            success = true;
            return result;
        }
        finally
        {
            if (!success && client != null)
            {
                client.Abort();
            }
        }
    }
}

我可以把它用作:

string data = Service<ServiceClient>.Use(x => x.GetData(7));

@Marc Gravell

用这个不是很好吗:

public static TResult Using<T, TResult>(this T client, Func<T, TResult> work)
        where T : ICommunicationObject
{
    try
    {
        var result = work(client);

        client.Close();

        return result;
    }
    catch (Exception e)
    {
        client.Abort();

        throw;
    }
}

或者在Service<IOrderService>的情况下，同样的事情(Func<T, TResult>)。使用

这将使返回变量更容易。

如果不需要IoC或使用自动生成的客户端(服务引用)，那么可以简单地使用包装器来管理关闭，并在客户端处于安全状态(不会抛出任何异常)时让GC接管客户端。GC将在serviceclient中调用Dispose，而这个将调用Close。因为它已经关闭了，所以不会造成任何损害。我使用这个没有问题的生产代码。

public class AutoCloseWcf : IDisposable
{

    private ICommunicationObject CommunicationObject;

    public AutoDisconnect(ICommunicationObject CommunicationObject)
    {
        this.CommunicationObject = CommunicationObject;
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        if (CommunicationObject == null)
            return;
        try {
            if (CommunicationObject.State != CommunicationState.Faulted) {
                CommunicationObject.Close();
            } else {
                CommunicationObject.Abort();
            }
        } catch (CommunicationException ce) {
            CommunicationObject.Abort();
        } catch (TimeoutException toe) {
            CommunicationObject.Abort();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            CommunicationObject.Abort();
            //Perhaps log this

        } finally {
            CommunicationObject = null;
        }
    }
}

然后，当你访问服务器时，你创建客户端，并在autodisconnect中使用using:

var Ws = new ServiceClient("netTcpEndPointName");
using (new AutoCloseWcf(Ws)) {

    Ws.Open();

    Ws.Test();
}

Given a choice between the solution advocated by IServiceOriented.com and the solution advocated by David Barret's blog, I prefer the simplicity offered by overriding the client's Dispose() method. This allows me to continue to use the using() statement as one would expect with a disposable object. However, as @Brian pointed out, this solution contains a race condition in that the State might not be faulted when it is checked but could be by the time Close() is called, in which case the CommunicationException still occurs.

因此，为了解决这个问题，我采用了一种混合了两种方法的解决方案。

void IDisposable.Dispose()
{
    bool success = false;
    try 
    {
        if (State != CommunicationState.Faulted) 
        {
            Close();
            success = true;
        }
    } 
    finally 
    {
        if (!success) 
            Abort();
    }
}