我使用Bootstrap和以下不工作:
<tbody>
<a href="#">
<tr>
<td>Blah Blah</td>
<td>1234567</td>
<td>£158,000</td>
</tr>
</a>
</tbody>
我使用Bootstrap和以下不工作:
<tbody>
<a href="#">
<tr>
<td>Blah Blah</td>
<td>1234567</td>
<td>£158,000</td>
</tr>
</a>
</tbody>
当前回答
你不能这么做。它是无效的HTML。你不能把<a>放在<tbody>和<tr>之间。试试这个吧:
<tr onclick="window.location='#';">
...
</tr>
为指针视图添加样式
[data-href] { cursor: pointer; }
当您开始处理它时,您需要使用JavaScript在HTML之外分配单击处理程序。
其他回答
你可以在tr中使用onclick javascript方法,使其可点击,如果你需要建立你的链接,由于一些细节,你可以在javascript中声明一个函数,并在onclick中调用它,传递一些值。
这里有一篇文章解释了如何在2020年做到这一点:https://www.robertcooper.me/table-row-links
这篇文章解释了3种可能的解决方案:
使用JavaScript。 用锚定元素包装所有表单元格。 使用<div>元素代替原生HTML表格元素,以使表格行为<a>元素。
本文深入讨论了如何实现每个解决方案(使用到codedependency的链接),还考虑了一些边缘情况,例如如何处理希望在表单元格中添加链接的情况(嵌套<a>元素不是有效的HTML,因此需要解决这个问题)。
正如@gameliela所指出的,找到一种不将整行作为链接的方法也是值得的,因为这将简化许多事情。然而,我确实认为,将整个表行作为一个链接来点击是一种很好的用户体验,因为用户可以方便地单击表上的任何位置来导航到相应的页面。
还有另一种方法……
HTML:
<table>
<tbody>
<tr class='clickableRow'>
<td>Blah Blah</td>
<td>1234567</td>
<td>£158,000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
jQuery:
$(function() {
$(".clickableRow").on("click", function() {
location.href="http://google.com";
});
});
作者注一:
请看看下面的其他答案,特别是那些不使用jquery的答案。
作者注二:
为子孙后代保留下来,但在2020年肯定是错误的做法。(早在2017年就不是惯用用法了)
原来的答案
你正在使用Bootstrap,这意味着你正在使用jQuery:^),所以一种方法是:
<tbody>
<tr class='clickable-row' data-href='url://'>
<td>Blah Blah</td> <td>1234567</td> <td>£158,000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
jQuery(document).ready(function($) {
$(".clickable-row").click(function() {
window.location = $(this).data("href");
});
});
当然你不必使用href或切换位置,你可以在点击处理函数中做任何你喜欢的事情。阅读jQuery和如何编写处理程序;
使用类而不是id的优点是你可以将解决方案应用到多行:
<tbody>
<tr class='clickable-row' data-href='url://link-for-first-row/'>
<td>Blah Blah</td> <td>1234567</td> <td>£158,000</td>
</tr>
<tr class='clickable-row' data-href='url://some-other-link/'>
<td>More money</td> <td>1234567</td> <td>£800,000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
并且您的代码基础不会改变。相同的处理程序将处理所有行。
另一个选择
您可以像这样使用Bootstrap jQuery回调(在文档中)。准备回调):
$("#container").on('click-row.bs.table', function (e, row, $element) {
window.location = $element.data('href');
});
这样做的好处是不会在表排序时被重置(这发生在另一个选项中)。
Note
window.document.location是过时的(或至少已弃用)使用window。位置相反。
我投入了很多时间来解决这个问题。
有3种方法:
Use JavaScript. The clear drawbacks: it's not possible to open a new tab natively, and when hovering over the row there will be no indication on status bar like regular links have. Accessibility is also a question. Use HTML/CSS only. This means putting <a> nested under each <td>. A simple approach like this fiddle doesn't work - Because the clickable surface is not necessarily equal for each column. This is a serious UX concern. Also, if you need a <button> on the row, it is not valid HTML to nest it under <a> tag (although browsers are ok with that). I've found 3 other ways to implement this approach. First is ok, the other two are not great. a) Have a look on this example: tr { height: 0; } td { height: 0; padding: 0; } /* A hack to overcome differences between Chrome and Firefox */ @-moz-document url-prefix() { td { height: 100%; } } a { display: block; height: 100%; } It works, but due to inconsistencies between Chrome and Firefox it requires browser-specific hack to overcome the differences. Also Chrome will always align the cell content to the top, which can cause problems with long texts, especially if varying line heights are involved. b) Setting <td> to { display: contents; }. This leads to 2 other problems: b1. If someone else tries to style directly the <td> tag, like setting it to { width: 20px; }, we need to pass that style somehow to the <a> tag. We need some magic to do that, probably more magic than in the Javascript alternative. b2. { display: contents; } is still experimental; specifically it's not supported on Edge. c) Setting <td> to { height: --some-fixed-value; }. This is just not flexible enough. The last approach, which I recommend to seriously thinking of, is to not using clickable rows at all. Clickable rows is not a great UX experience: it's not easy to visually mark them as clickable, and it poses challenges when multiple parts are clickable within the rows, like buttons. So a viable alternative could be to have an <a> tag only on the first column, displayed as a regular link, and give it the role of navigating the whole row.