我有一些单元测试,期望“当前时间”与DateTime不同。显然,我不想改变电脑的时间。

实现这一目标的最佳策略是什么?


当前回答

这些都是很好的答案,这是我在另一个项目中所做的:

用法:

获取今天的真实日期时间

var today = SystemTime.Now().Date;

而不是使用DateTime。现在,你需要使用SystemTime.Now()…这并不难改变,但这种解决方案可能并不适合所有项目。

时间旅行(让我们去5年后)

SystemTime.SetDateTime(today.AddYears(5));

获得我们虚假的“今天”(从“今天”开始算起5年)

var fakeToday = SystemTime.Now().Date;

重置日期

SystemTime.ResetDateTime();

/// <summary>
/// Used for getting DateTime.Now(), time is changeable for unit testing
/// </summary>
public static class SystemTime
{
    /// <summary> Normally this is a pass-through to DateTime.Now, but it can be overridden with SetDateTime( .. ) for testing or debugging.
    /// </summary>
    public static Func<DateTime> Now = () => DateTime.Now;

    /// <summary> Set time to return when SystemTime.Now() is called.
    /// </summary>
    public static void SetDateTime(DateTime dateTimeNow)
    {
        Now = () =>  dateTimeNow;
    }

    /// <summary> Resets SystemTime.Now() to return DateTime.Now.
    /// </summary>
    public static void ResetDateTime()
    {
        Now = () => DateTime.Now;
    }
}

其他回答

好的做法是,当DateTimeProvider实现IDisposable时。

public class DateTimeProvider : IDisposable 
{ 
    [ThreadStatic] 
    private static DateTime? _injectedDateTime; 

    private DateTimeProvider() 
    { 
    } 

    /// <summary> 
    /// Gets DateTime now. 
    /// </summary> 
    /// <value> 
    /// The DateTime now. 
    /// </value> 
    public static DateTime Now 
    { 
        get 
        { 
            return _injectedDateTime ?? DateTime.Now; 
        } 
    } 

    /// <summary> 
    /// Injects the actual date time. 
    /// </summary> 
    /// <param name="actualDateTime">The actual date time.</param> 
    public static IDisposable InjectActualDateTime(DateTime actualDateTime) 
    { 
        _injectedDateTime = actualDateTime; 

        return new DateTimeProvider(); 
    } 

    public void Dispose() 
    { 
        _injectedDateTime = null; 
    } 
} 

接下来,您可以为单元测试注入假DateTime

    using (var date = DateTimeProvider.InjectActualDateTime(expectedDateTime)) 
    { 
        var bankAccount = new BankAccount(); 

        bankAccount.DepositMoney(600); 

        var lastTransaction = bankAccount.Transactions.Last(); 

        Assert.IsTrue(expectedDateTime.Equals(bankAccount.Transactions[0].TransactionDate)); 
    } 

参见示例DateTimeProvider示例

摩尔数:

[Test]  
public void TestOfDateTime()  
{  
      var firstValue = DateTime.Now;
      MDateTime.NowGet = () => new DateTime(2000,1,1);
      var secondValue = DateTime.Now;
      Assert(firstValue > secondValue); // would be false if 'moleing' failed
}

免责声明-我工作的鼹鼠

一个老问题,但仍然有效。

我的方法是创建一个新的接口和类来包装System.DateTime.Now调用

public interface INow
{
    DateTime Execute();
}

public sealed class Now : INow
{
    public DateTime Execute()
    {
        return DateTime.Now
    }
}

该接口可以注入到任何需要获取当前日期和时间的类中。在这个例子中,我有一个类,它将一个时间跨度添加到当前日期和时间(一个可测试的单元System.DateTime.Now.Add(timespan))

public interface IAddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime
{
    DateTime Execute(TimeSpan input);
}

public class AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime : IAddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime
{
    private readonly INow _now;

    public AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime(INow now)
    {
        this._now = now;
    }

    public DateTime Execute(TimeSpan input)
    {
        var currentDateAndTime = this._now.Execute();

        return currentDateAndTime.Add(input);
    }
}

并且可以编写测试以确保其正确运行。我使用NUnit和Moq,但任何测试框架都可以

public class Execute
{
    private Moq.Mock<INow> _nowMock;

    private AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime _systemUnderTest;

    [SetUp]
    public void Initialize()
    {
        this._nowMock = new Moq.Mock<INow>(Moq.MockBehavior.Strict);

        this._systemUnderTest = AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime(
            this._nowMock.Object);
    }

    [Test]
    public void AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTimeExecute0001()
    {
        // arrange

        var input = new TimeSpan(911252);

        // arrange : mocks

        this._nowMock
            .Setup(a => a.Execute())
            .Returns(new DateTime(348756););

        // arrange : expected

        var expected = new DateTime(911252 + 348756);

        // act

        var actual = this._systemUnderTest.Execute(input).Result;

        // assert

        Assert.Equals(actual, expected);
    }
}

此模式适用于依赖于外部因素的任何函数,如System.Random.Next(), System.DateTime.Now。UtcNow, system . guide . newguid()等。

参见https://loadlimited.visualstudio.com/Stamina/_git/Stamina.Core获取更多示例或获取https://www.nuget.org/packages/Stamina.Core nuget包。

我们使用的是静态SystemTime对象,但是在运行并行单元测试时遇到了问题。我尝试使用Henk van Boeijen的解决方案,但在派生异步线程上有问题,最终以类似于下面的方式使用AsyncLocal:

public static class Clock
{
    private static Func<DateTime> _utcNow = () => DateTime.UtcNow;

    static AsyncLocal<Func<DateTime>> _override = new AsyncLocal<Func<DateTime>>();

    public static DateTime UtcNow => (_override.Value ?? _utcNow)();

    public static void Set(Func<DateTime> func)
    {
        _override.Value = func;
    }

    public static void Reset()
    {
        _override.Value = null;
    }
}

来源:https://gist.github.com/CraftyFella/42f459f7687b0b8b268fc311e6b4af08

也许不太专业,但更简单的解决方案可以在消费者方法中创建一个DateTime参数。例如,不使用像SampleMethod这样的make方法,而是使用带参数的make SampleMethod1。SampleMethod1的测试更简单

public void SampleMethod()
    {
        DateTime anotherDateTime = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-10);
        if ((DateTime.Now-anotherDateTime).TotalDays>10)
        {

        }
    }
    public void SampleMethod1(DateTime dateTimeNow)
    {
        DateTime anotherDateTime = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-10);
        if ((dateTimeNow - anotherDateTime).TotalDays > 10)
        {

        }

    }