Ladislav。 对于IE8，你可以像这样重新定义alert()

/** 
 * Definition of global attached to window properties <br/>
 */ 
    (function() {
      nalert = window.alert;
      Type = {
          native: 'native',
          custom: 'custom'
      };
    })();

/**
 * Factory method for calling alert(). 
 * It will be call a native alert() or a custom redefined alert() by a Type param.
 * This defeinition need for IE
 */ 
    (function(proxy) {

          proxy.alert = function () {
          var message = (!arguments[0]) ? 'null': arguments[0];
          var type = (!arguments[1]) ? '': arguments[1];

          if(type && type == 'native') {
           nalert(message);
          }
          else {
               document.write('<h1>I am redefiend alert()<br/>Alert say: '+message+'</h1>');
          }     
      };
   })(this);

并调用as

alert('Hello, hacker!');
nalert('I am native alert');
alert('Hello, user!', Type.custom);

它在firefox和ie8中确实有效。我看不出有什么浏览器是它不能运行的。这是javascript工作的基本原理，尽管人们不经常看到它与原生函数一起使用=)

When it comes to js browser functions window.alert is pre-eminent and most well known, people who don't know js know alert() -- rest assured it is supported in all browsers in use today and your code snippet is as well. However, I wouldn't override (well this is more like refactoring rather than override in the OOP sense) alert() for a particular use case as yours because when you actually need to use alert() with no template, and you probably will, then you'll need another non-alert function to do so.

它绝对是“支持的”。这是你的网页，你想做什么就做什么。

我已经这样做了，在不修改库的情况下跟踪分析事件，但通过潜入事件。

使用代理模式:

(function(proxied) {
  window.alert = function() {
    // do something here
    return proxied.apply(this, arguments);
  };
})(window.alert);

如果需要，还可以绕过对原始函数的调用(代理)

更多信息:JQuery类型#代理模式

我做的一个快速破解来找到警报来自哪里，是去控制台，然后输入这个

function alert(message) { 
  console.info(message);
  debugger;
} 

我认为每个Javascript实现都将支持这一点，并且这样做不会有任何危险。通常用HTML/CSS代替简单的os风格的警告框。这样做意味着您不必更改现有的代码!这一事实使得Javascript非常棒。