我目前正在使用以下代码在我的程序中右修剪所有std::字符串:
std::string s;
s.erase(s.find_last_not_of(" \n\r\t")+1);
它工作得很好,但我想知道是否有一些最终情况下它可能会失败?
当然,有优雅的选择和左修剪解决方案的答案是受欢迎的。
我目前正在使用以下代码在我的程序中右修剪所有std::字符串:
std::string s;
s.erase(s.find_last_not_of(" \n\r\t")+1);
它工作得很好,但我想知道是否有一些最终情况下它可能会失败?
当然,有优雅的选择和左修剪解决方案的答案是受欢迎的。
当前回答
For what it's worth, here is a trim implementation with an eye towards performance. It's much quicker than many other trim routines I've seen around. Instead of using iterators and std::finds, it uses raw c strings and indices. It optimizes the following special cases: size 0 string (do nothing), string with no whitespace to trim (do nothing), string with only trailing whitespace to trim (just resize the string), string that's entirely whitespace (just clear the string). And finally, in the worst case (string with leading whitespace), it does its best to perform an efficient copy construction, performing only 1 copy and then moving that copy in place of the original string.
void TrimString(std::string & str)
{
if(str.empty())
return;
const auto pStr = str.c_str();
size_t front = 0;
while(front < str.length() && std::isspace(int(pStr[front]))) {++front;}
size_t back = str.length();
while(back > front && std::isspace(int(pStr[back-1]))) {--back;}
if(0 == front)
{
if(back < str.length())
{
str.resize(back - front);
}
}
else if(back <= front)
{
str.clear();
}
else
{
str = std::move(std::string(str.begin()+front, str.begin()+back));
}
}
其他回答
有点晚了,不过没关系。c++ 11在这里,我们有lambda和auto变量。所以我的版本,也处理全空白和空字符串,是:
#include <cctype>
#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
inline std::string trim(const std::string &s)
{
auto wsfront=std::find_if_not(s.begin(),s.end(),[](int c){return std::isspace(c);});
auto wsback=std::find_if_not(s.rbegin(),s.rend(),[](int c){return std::isspace(c);}).base();
return (wsback<=wsfront ? std::string() : std::string(wsfront,wsback));
}
我们可以从wsfront创建一个反向迭代器,并在第二个find_if_not中使用它作为终止条件,但这只在全空白字符串的情况下有用,gcc 4.8至少不足以用auto推断反向迭代器(std::string::const_reverse_iterator)的类型。我不知道构造反向迭代器有多贵,这里是YMMV。修改后,代码如下所示:
inline std::string trim(const std::string &s)
{
auto wsfront=std::find_if_not(s.begin(),s.end(),[](int c){return std::isspace(c);});
return std::string(wsfront,std::find_if_not(s.rbegin(),std::string::const_reverse_iterator(wsfront),[](int c){return std::isspace(c);}).base());
}
在c++中,你可以使用这个函数来修饰字符串
void trim(string& str){
while(str[0] == ' ') str.erase(str.begin());
while(str[str.size() - 1] == ' ') str.pop_back();
}
For what it's worth, here is a trim implementation with an eye towards performance. It's much quicker than many other trim routines I've seen around. Instead of using iterators and std::finds, it uses raw c strings and indices. It optimizes the following special cases: size 0 string (do nothing), string with no whitespace to trim (do nothing), string with only trailing whitespace to trim (just resize the string), string that's entirely whitespace (just clear the string). And finally, in the worst case (string with leading whitespace), it does its best to perform an efficient copy construction, performing only 1 copy and then moving that copy in place of the original string.
void TrimString(std::string & str)
{
if(str.empty())
return;
const auto pStr = str.c_str();
size_t front = 0;
while(front < str.length() && std::isspace(int(pStr[front]))) {++front;}
size_t back = str.length();
while(back > front && std::isspace(int(pStr[back-1]))) {--back;}
if(0 == front)
{
if(back < str.length())
{
str.resize(back - front);
}
}
else if(back <= front)
{
str.clear();
}
else
{
str = std::move(std::string(str.begin()+front, str.begin()+back));
}
}
下面是一个通道(可能是两个通道)的解决方案。它遍历字符串的空白部分两次,非空白部分一次。
void trim(std::string& s) {
if (s.empty())
return;
int l = 0, r = s.size() - 1;
while (l < s.size() && std::isspace(s[l++])); // l points to first non-whitespace char.
while (r >= 0 && std::isspace(s[r--])); // r points to last non-whitespace char.
if (l > r)
s = "";
else {
l--;
r++;
int wi = 0;
while (l <= r)
s[wi++] = s[l++];
s.erase(wi);
}
return;
}
因为我想用c++ 11的方法更新我的旧c++修剪函数,我已经测试了很多关于这个问题的答案。我的结论是,我保留了旧的c++解决方案!
它是总体上最快的一个,即使添加更多的字符来检查(例如\r\n我没有看到\f\v的用例)仍然比使用算法的解决方案更快。
std::string & trimMe (std::string & str)
{
// right trim
while (str.length () > 0 && (str [str.length ()-1] == ' ' || str [str.length ()-1] == '\t'))
str.erase (str.length ()-1, 1);
// left trim
while (str.length () > 0 && (str [0] == ' ' || str [0] == '\t'))
str.erase (0, 1);
return str;
}