我就是这么做的。

我不喜欢创建一个新集合并反向迭代它的想法。

IntStream#映射的想法是非常整洁的，但我更喜欢IntStream#迭代方法，因为我认为倒计时到零的想法更好地表达了迭代方法，更容易理解从后面到前面的数组行走。

import static java.lang.Math.max;

private static final double EXACT_MATCH = 0d;

public static IntStream reverseStream(final int[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).map(index -> array[index]);
}

public static DoubleStream reverseStream(final double[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).mapToDouble(index -> array[index]);
}

public static <T> Stream<T> reverseStream(final T[] array) {
    return countdownFrom(array.length - 1).mapToObj(index -> array[index]);
}

public static IntStream countdownFrom(final int top) {
    return IntStream.iterate(top, t -> t - 1).limit(max(0, (long) top + 1));
}

下面是一些测试来证明它是有效的:

import static java.lang.Integer.MAX_VALUE;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;

@Test
public void testReverseStream_emptyArrayCreatesEmptyStream() {
    Assert.assertEquals(0, reverseStream(new double[0]).count());
}

@Test
public void testReverseStream_singleElementCreatesSingleElementStream() {
    Assert.assertEquals(1, reverseStream(new double[1]).count());
    final double[] singleElementArray = new double[] { 123.4 };
    assertArrayEquals(singleElementArray, reverseStream(singleElementArray).toArray(), EXACT_MATCH);
}

@Test
public void testReverseStream_multipleElementsAreStreamedInReversedOrder() {
    final double[] arr = new double[] { 1d, 2d, 3d };
    final double[] revArr = new double[] { 3d, 2d, 1d };
    Assert.assertEquals(arr.length, reverseStream(arr).count());
    Assert.assertArrayEquals(revArr, reverseStream(arr).toArray(), EXACT_MATCH);
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_returnsAllElementsFromTopToZeroInReverseOrder() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[] { 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 }, countdownFrom(4).toArray());
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_countingDownStartingWithZeroOutputsTheNumberZero() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[] { 0 }, countdownFrom(0).toArray());
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_doesNotChokeOnIntegerMaxValue() {
    assertEquals(true, countdownFrom(MAX_VALUE).anyMatch(x -> x == MAX_VALUE));
}

@Test
public void testCountdownFrom_givesZeroLengthCountForNegativeValues() {
    assertArrayEquals(new int[0], countdownFrom(-1).toArray());
    assertArrayEquals(new int[0], countdownFrom(-4).toArray());
}

Java 8的方法:

    List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(1,2,3,4);
    Comparator<Integer> comparator = Integer::compare;
    list.stream().sorted(comparator.reversed()).forEach(System.out::println);

一般问题:

流不存储任何元素。

因此，如果不将元素存储在某个中间集合中，就不可能以相反的顺序迭代元素。

Stream.of("1", "2", "20", "3")
      .collect(Collectors.toCollection(ArrayDeque::new)) // or LinkedList
      .descendingIterator()
      .forEachRemaining(System.out::println);

更新:改变LinkedList为ArrayDeque(更好)，详情请看这里

打印:

3

20

2

1

顺便说一下，使用sort方法是不正确的，因为它排序，而不是反转(假设流可能有无序元素)

具体问题:

我发现这很简单，更容易和直观(复制@Holger评论)

IntStream.iterate(to - 1, i -> i - 1).limit(to - from)

最简单的方法(simple collect -支持并行流):

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    return stream
            .collect(Collector.of(
                    () -> new ArrayDeque<T>(),
                    ArrayDeque::addFirst,
                    (q1, q2) -> { q2.addAll(q1); return q2; })
            )
            .stream();
}

高级方式(以持续的方式支持并行流):

public static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> stream) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(stream, "stream");

    class ReverseSpliterator implements Spliterator<T> {
        private Spliterator<T> spliterator;
        private final Deque<T> deque = new ArrayDeque<>();

        private ReverseSpliterator(Spliterator<T> spliterator) {
            this.spliterator = spliterator;
        }

        @Override
        @SuppressWarnings({"StatementWithEmptyBody"})
        public boolean tryAdvance(Consumer<? super T> action) {
            while(spliterator.tryAdvance(deque::addFirst));
            if(!deque.isEmpty()) {
                action.accept(deque.remove());
                return true;
            }
            return false;
        }

        @Override
        public Spliterator<T> trySplit() {
            // After traveling started the spliterator don't contain elements!
            Spliterator<T> prev = spliterator.trySplit();
            if(prev == null) {
                return null;
            }

            Spliterator<T> me = spliterator;
            spliterator = prev;
            return new ReverseSpliterator(me);
        }

        @Override
        public long estimateSize() {
            return spliterator.estimateSize();
        }

        @Override
        public int characteristics() {
            return spliterator.characteristics();
        }

        @Override
        public Comparator<? super T> getComparator() {
            Comparator<? super T> comparator = spliterator.getComparator();
            return (comparator != null) ? comparator.reversed() : null;
        }

        @Override
        public void forEachRemaining(Consumer<? super T> action) {
            // Ensure that tryAdvance is called at least once
            if(!deque.isEmpty() || tryAdvance(action)) {
                deque.forEach(action);
            }
        }
    }

    return StreamSupport.stream(new ReverseSpliterator(stream.spliterator()), stream.isParallel());
}

注意，您可以快速扩展到其他类型的流(IntStream，…)。

测试:

// Use parallel if you wish only
revert(Stream.of("One", "Two", "Three", "Four", "Five", "Six").parallel())
    .forEachOrdered(System.out::println);

结果:

Six
Five
Four
Three
Two
One

其他注意事项:最简单的方法是，当它与其他流操作一起使用时就不那么有用了(收集连接破坏了并行性)。前进的方式就没有这个问题，它也保持了流的初始特征，比如排序，所以，它是在反向操作之后用于其他流操作的方式。

How about reversing the Collection backing the stream prior?

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;

public void reverseTest(List<Integer> sampleCollection) {
    Collections.reverse(sampleCollection); // remember this reverses the elements in the list, so if you want the original input collection to remain untouched clone it first.

    sampleCollection.stream().forEach(item -> {
      // you op here
    });
}

这里的许多解决方案对IntStream进行排序或反转，但这不必要地需要中间存储。斯图尔特·马克斯的解决方案是可行的:

static IntStream revRange(int from, int to) {
    return IntStream.range(from, to).map(i -> to - i + from - 1);
}

它正确地处理溢出以及，通过这个测试:

@Test
public void testRevRange() {
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(0, 5).toArray(), new int[]{4, 3, 2, 1, 0});
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(-5, 0).toArray(), new int[]{-1, -2, -3, -4, -5});
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(1, 4).toArray(), new int[]{3, 2, 1});
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(0, 0).toArray(), new int[0]);
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(0, -1).toArray(), new int[0]);
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(MIN_VALUE, MIN_VALUE).toArray(), new int[0]);
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(MAX_VALUE, MAX_VALUE).toArray(), new int[0]);
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(MIN_VALUE, MIN_VALUE + 1).toArray(), new int[]{MIN_VALUE});
    assertArrayEquals(revRange(MAX_VALUE - 1, MAX_VALUE).toArray(), new int[]{MAX_VALUE - 1});
}