如果你发现自己做这种类型的事情是正常的(例如,创建 undo redo 功能 ) 它可能值得看看 Immutable.js

const map1 = Immutable.fromJS( { a: 1, b: 2, c: { d: 3 } } );
const map2 = map1.setIn( [ 'c', 'd' ], 50 );

console.log( `${ map1.getIn( [ 'c', 'd' ] ) } vs ${ map2.getIn( [ 'c', 'd' ] ) }` ); // "3 vs 50"

https://codepen.io/anon/pen/OBpqNE?编辑器=1111

因为回归只是太昂贵的JavaScript,我发现的大多数答案是使用回归,而JSON方法将错过非JSON转换部分(功能等)。所以我做了一些研究,并发现这个拖拉机技术避免它。

/*
 * Trampoline to avoid recursion in JavaScript, see:
 *     https://www.integralist.co.uk/posts/functional-recursive-javascript-programming/
 */
function trampoline() {
    var func = arguments[0];
    var args = [];
    for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
        args[i - 1] = arguments[i];
    }

    var currentBatch = func.apply(this, args);
    var nextBatch = [];

    while (currentBatch && currentBatch.length > 0) {
        currentBatch.forEach(function(eachFunc) {
            var ret = eachFunc();
            if (ret && ret.length > 0) {
                nextBatch = nextBatch.concat(ret);
            }
        });

        currentBatch = nextBatch;
        nextBatch = [];
    }
};

/*
 *  Deep clone an object using the trampoline technique.
 *
 *  @param target {Object} Object to clone
 *  @return {Object} Cloned object.
 */
function clone(target) {
    if (typeof target !== 'object') {
        return target;
    }
    if (target == null || Object.keys(target).length == 0) {
        return target;
    }

    function _clone(b, a) {
        var nextBatch = [];
        for (var key in b) {
            if (typeof b[key] === 'object' && b[key] !== null) {
                if (b[key] instanceof Array) {
                    a[key] = [];
                }
                else {
                    a[key] = {};
                }
                nextBatch.push(_clone.bind(null, b[key], a[key]));
            }
            else {
                a[key] = b[key];
            }
        }
        return nextBatch;
    };

    var ret = target instanceof Array ? [] : {};
    (trampoline.bind(null, _clone))(target, ret);
    return ret;
};

我迟到回答这个问题,但我有另一种方式来克隆对象:

function cloneObject(obj) {
    if (obj === null || typeof(obj) !== 'object')
        return obj;
    var temp = obj.constructor(); // changed
    for (var key in obj) {
        if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
            obj['isActiveClone'] = null;
            temp[key] = cloneObject(obj[key]);
            delete obj['isActiveClone'];
        }
    }
    return temp;
}

var b = cloneObject({"a":1,"b":2});   // calling

更快、更快的是:

var a = {"a":1,"b":2};
var b = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(a));  

和

var a = {"a":1,"b":2};

// Deep copy
var newObject = jQuery.extend(true, {}, a);

我已经标记了代码,你可以在这里测试结果:

和分享结果: 参考: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/hasOwnProperty

在 JavaScript 中,您可以写下您的 deepCopy 方法如:

function deepCopy(src) {
  let target = Array.isArray(src) ? [] : {};
  for (let prop in src) {
    let value = src[prop];
    if(value && typeof value === 'object') {
      target[prop] = deepCopy(value);
  } else {
      target[prop] = value;
  }
 }
    return target;
}

function clone(obj)
 { var clone = {};
   clone.prototype = obj.prototype;
   for (property in obj) clone[property] = obj[property];
   return clone;
 }

使用 Object.create() 获取原型和支持的例子,并使用 for() 圈获取可列的密钥:

function cloneObject(source) {
    var key,value;
    var clone = Object.create(source);

    for (key in source) {
        if (source.hasOwnProperty(key) === true) {
            value = source[key];

            if (value!==null && typeof value==="object") {
                clone[key] = cloneObject(value);
            } else {
                clone[key] = value;
            }
        }
    }

    return clone;
}