最好像这样使用关键字继续安全构造

int i=-1;
foreach (Object o in collection)
{
    ++i;
    //...
    continue; //<--- safe to call, index will be increased
    //...
}

最好像这样使用关键字继续安全构造

int i=-1;
foreach (Object o in collection)
{
    ++i;
    //...
    continue; //<--- safe to call, index will be increased
    //...
}

我想更理论化地讨论这个问题(因为它已经有了足够多的实际答案)

.net为数据组(又称集合)提供了一个非常好的抽象模型。

在最顶端，也是最抽象的，你有一个IEnumerable它只是一组你可以枚举的数据。你如何枚举并不重要，重要的是你可以枚举一些数据。这个枚举是由一个完全不同的对象完成的，IEnumerator

这些接口定义如下:

//
// Summary:
//     Exposes an enumerator, which supports a simple iteration over a non-generic collection.
public interface IEnumerable
{
    //
    // Summary:
    //     Returns an enumerator that iterates through a collection.
    //
    // Returns:
    //     An System.Collections.IEnumerator object that can be used to iterate through
    //     the collection.
    IEnumerator GetEnumerator();
}

//
// Summary:
//     Supports a simple iteration over a non-generic collection.
public interface IEnumerator
{
    //
    // Summary:
    //     Gets the element in the collection at the current position of the enumerator.
    //
    // Returns:
    //     The element in the collection at the current position of the enumerator.
    object Current { get; }

    //
    // Summary:
    //     Advances the enumerator to the next element of the collection.
    //
    // Returns:
    //     true if the enumerator was successfully advanced to the next element; false if
    //     the enumerator has passed the end of the collection.
    //
    // Exceptions:
    //   T:System.InvalidOperationException:
    //     The collection was modified after the enumerator was created.
    bool MoveNext();
    //
    // Summary:
    //     Sets the enumerator to its initial position, which is before the first element
    //     in the collection.
    //
    // Exceptions:
    //   T:System.InvalidOperationException:
    //     The collection was modified after the enumerator was created.
    void Reset();
}

as you might have noticed, the IEnumerator interface doesn't "know" what an index is, it just knows what element it's currently pointing to, and how to move to the next one. now here is the trick: foreach considers every input collection an IEnumerable, even if it is a more concrete implementation like an IList<T> (which inherits from IEnumerable), it will only see the abstract interface IEnumerable. what foreach is actually doing, is calling GetEnumerator on the collection, and calling MoveNext until it returns false. so here is the problem, you want to define a concrete concept "Indices" on an abstract concept "Enumerables", the built in foreach construct doesn't give you that option, so your only way is to define it yourself, either by what you are doing originally (creating a counter manually) or just use an implementation of IEnumerator that recognizes indices AND implement a foreach construct that recognizes that custom implementation.

就我个人而言，我会创建一个这样的扩展方法

public static class Ext
{
    public static void FE<T>(this IEnumerable<T> l, Action<int, T> act)
    {
        int counter = 0;
        foreach (var item in l)
        {
            act(counter, item);
            counter++;
        }
    }
}

像这样使用它

var x = new List<string>() { "hello", "world" };
x.FE((ind, ele) =>
{
    Console.WriteLine($"{ind}: {ele}");
});

这也避免了在其他答案中看到的任何不必要的分配。

出于兴趣，Phil Haack刚刚在Razor Templated Delegate的上下文中写了一个例子(http://haacked.com/archive/2011/04/14/a-better-razor-foreach-loop.aspx)。

实际上，他编写了一个扩展方法，将迭代包装在一个“IteratedItem”类中(见下文)，允许在迭代期间访问索引和元素。

public class IndexedItem<TModel> {
  public IndexedItem(int index, TModel item) {
    Index = index;
    Item = item;
  }

  public int Index { get; private set; }
  public TModel Item { get; private set; }
}

然而，如果你在非razor环境中做一个单独的操作(例如，一个可以作为lambda提供的操作)，这在非razor环境中不会是for/foreach语法的可靠替代。

如果集合是列表，则可以使用list。IndexOf，如:

foreach (Object o in collection)
{
    // ...
    @collection.IndexOf(o)
}

这样你就可以使用LINQ来使用索引和值:

ListValues.Select((x, i) => new { Value = x, Index = i }).ToList().ForEach(element =>
{
    // element.Index
    // element.Value
});