你可以通过使用Python中的filter和next方法来实现这一点。

方法过滤给定序列并返回一个迭代器。 Next方法接受迭代器并返回列表中的下一个元素。

所以你可以通过，

my_dict = [
    {"name": "Tom", "age": 10},
    {"name": "Mark", "age": 5},
    {"name": "Pam", "age": 7}
]

next(filter(lambda obj: obj.get('name') == 'Pam', my_dict), None)

输出是，

{'name': 'Pam', 'age': 7}

注意:如果没有找到所搜索的名称，上述代码将返回None。

你试过熊猫套餐吗?它非常适合这类搜索任务，也进行了优化。

import pandas as pd

listOfDicts = [
{"name": "Tom", "age": 10},
{"name": "Mark", "age": 5},
{"name": "Pam", "age": 7}
]

# Create a data frame, keys are used as column headers.
# Dict items with the same key are entered into the same respective column.
df = pd.DataFrame(listOfDicts)

# The pandas dataframe allows you to pick out specific values like so:

df2 = df[ (df['name'] == 'Pam') & (df['age'] == 7) ]

# Alternate syntax, same thing

df2 = df[ (df.name == 'Pam') & (df.age == 7) ]

我在下面添加了一些基准测试，以说明熊猫在更大范围内(即10万+条目)的更快运行时间:

setup_large = 'dicts = [];\
[dicts.extend(({ "name": "Tom", "age": 10 },{ "name": "Mark", "age": 5 },\
{ "name": "Pam", "age": 7 },{ "name": "Dick", "age": 12 })) for _ in range(25000)];\
from operator import itemgetter;import pandas as pd;\
df = pd.DataFrame(dicts);'

setup_small = 'dicts = [];\
dicts.extend(({ "name": "Tom", "age": 10 },{ "name": "Mark", "age": 5 },\
{ "name": "Pam", "age": 7 },{ "name": "Dick", "age": 12 }));\
from operator import itemgetter;import pandas as pd;\
df = pd.DataFrame(dicts);'

method1 = '[item for item in dicts if item["name"] == "Pam"]'
method2 = 'df[df["name"] == "Pam"]'

import timeit
t = timeit.Timer(method1, setup_small)
print('Small Method LC: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method2, setup_small)
print('Small Method Pandas: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))

t = timeit.Timer(method1, setup_large)
print('Large Method LC: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method2, setup_large)
print('Large Method Pandas: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))

#Small Method LC: 0.000191926956177
#Small Method Pandas: 0.044392824173
#Large Method LC: 1.98827004433
#Large Method Pandas: 0.324505090714

在我看来，这是最python的方式:

people = [
{'name': "Tom", 'age': 10},
{'name': "Mark", 'age': 5},
{'name': "Pam", 'age': 7}
]

filter(lambda person: person['name'] == 'Pam', people)

result(在Python 2中作为列表返回):

[{'age': 7, 'name': 'Pam'}]

注意:在python3中，返回一个filter对象。所以python3的解决方案是:

list(filter(lambda person: person['name'] == 'Pam', people))

鸭子将比列表理解或过滤器快得多。它在你的对象上建立一个索引，这样查找就不需要扫描每一个项目。

PIP安装鸭

from ducks import Dex

dicts = [
  {"name": "Tom", "age": 10},
  {"name": "Mark", "age": 5},
  {"name": "Pam", "age": 7}
]

# Build the index
dex = Dex(dicts, {'name': str, 'age': int})

# Find matching objects
dex[{'name': 'Pam', 'age': 7}]

结果:[{'name': 'Pam'， 'age': 7}]

你可以使用生成器表达式:

>>> dicts = [
...     { "name": "Tom", "age": 10 },
...     { "name": "Mark", "age": 5 },
...     { "name": "Pam", "age": 7 },
...     { "name": "Dick", "age": 12 }
... ]

>>> next(item for item in dicts if item["name"] == "Pam")
{'age': 7, 'name': 'Pam'}

如果你需要处理不存在的项，那么你可以做用户Matt在他的评论中建议的事情，并使用稍微不同的API提供默认值:

next((item for item in dicts if item["name"] == "Pam"), None)

并且要查找项目的索引，而不是项目本身，您可以枚举()列表:

next((i for i, item in enumerate(dicts) if item["name"] == "Pam"), None)

我测试了各种方法来遍历字典列表并返回键x具有特定值的字典。

结果:

速度:列表推导>生成器表达式>>常规列表迭代>>>过滤器。 所有的比例都与列表中的字典数量线性(10x列表大小-> 10x时间)。 对于大量(数千个)键，每个字典的键不会显著影响速度。请看我计算的图表:https://imgur.com/a/quQzv(方法名称见下文)。

所有测试均使用Python 3.6.4, W7x64完成。

from random import randint
from timeit import timeit


list_dicts = []
for _ in range(1000):     # number of dicts in the list
    dict_tmp = {}
    for i in range(10):   # number of keys for each dict
        dict_tmp[f"key{i}"] = randint(0,50)
    list_dicts.append( dict_tmp )



def a():
    # normal iteration over all elements
    for dict_ in list_dicts:
        if dict_["key3"] == 20:
            pass

def b():
    # use 'generator'
    for dict_ in (x for x in list_dicts if x["key3"] == 20):
        pass

def c():
    # use 'list'
    for dict_ in [x for x in list_dicts if x["key3"] == 20]:
        pass

def d():
    # use 'filter'
    for dict_ in filter(lambda x: x['key3'] == 20, list_dicts):
        pass

结果:

1.7303 # normal list iteration 
1.3849 # generator expression 
1.3158 # list comprehension 
7.7848 # filter