从Python 3.6开始，随机模块中有一个方法选择。

In [1]: import random

In [2]: random.choices(
...:     population=[['a','b'], ['b','a'], ['c','b']],
...:     weights=[0.2, 0.2, 0.6],
...:     k=10
...: )

Out[2]:
[['c', 'b'],
 ['c', 'b'],
 ['b', 'a'],
 ['c', 'b'],
 ['c', 'b'],
 ['b', 'a'],
 ['c', 'b'],
 ['b', 'a'],
 ['c', 'b'],
 ['c', 'b']]

注意随机。选择将与替换样本，每个文档:

返回一个k大小的元素列表，这些元素是从替换的填充中选择的。

为确保回答的完整性，请注意:

当从一个有限的总体中抽取一个抽样单位并返回时 对于该种群，在其特征被记录下来之后， 在绘制下一个单元之前，采样被称为“与” 更换”。它基本上意味着每个元素可以被选择多于 一次。

如果您需要在不替换的情况下进行采样，那么就像@ronan-paixão的精彩回答所说的那样，您可以使用numpy。Choice，其replace参数控制这种行为。

步骤1:生成您感兴趣的CDF F

步骤2:生成u.r.v. u

步骤3:求z=F^{-1}(u)

这种建模在概率论或随机过程课程中有描述。这是适用的，因为您有简单的CDF。

如果不介意使用numpy，可以使用numpy.random.choice。

例如:

import numpy

items  = [["item1", 0.2], ["item2", 0.3], ["item3", 0.45], ["item4", 0.05]
elems = [i[0] for i in items]
probs = [i[1] for i in items]

trials = 1000
results = [0] * len(items)
for i in range(trials):
    res = numpy.random.choice(items, p=probs)  #This is where the item is selected!
    results[items.index(res)] += 1
results = [r / float(trials) for r in results]
print "item\texpected\tactual"
for i in range(len(probs)):
    print "%s\t%0.4f\t%0.4f" % (items[i], probs[i], results[i])

如果你知道你需要提前做多少选择，你可以不像这样循环:

numpy.random.choice(items, trials, p=probs)

我不喜欢它们的语法。我只想具体说明这些项目是什么以及每项的权重是多少。我意识到我可以用随机。选项，但我很快就写了下面的类。

import random, string
from numpy import cumsum

class randomChoiceWithProportions:
    '''
    Accepts a dictionary of choices as keys and weights as values. Example if you want a unfair dice:


    choiceWeightDic = {"1":0.16666666666666666, "2": 0.16666666666666666, "3": 0.16666666666666666
    , "4": 0.16666666666666666, "5": .06666666666666666, "6": 0.26666666666666666}
    dice = randomChoiceWithProportions(choiceWeightDic)

    samples = []
    for i in range(100000):
        samples.append(dice.sample())

    # Should be close to .26666
    samples.count("6")/len(samples)

    # Should be close to .16666
    samples.count("1")/len(samples)
    '''
    def __init__(self, choiceWeightDic):
        self.choiceWeightDic = choiceWeightDic
        weightSum = sum(self.choiceWeightDic.values())
        assert weightSum == 1, 'Weights sum to ' + str(weightSum) + ', not 1.'
        self.valWeightDict = self._compute_valWeights()

    def _compute_valWeights(self):
        valWeights = list(cumsum(list(self.choiceWeightDic.values())))
        valWeightDict = dict(zip(list(self.choiceWeightDic.keys()), valWeights))
        return valWeightDict

    def sample(self):
        num = random.uniform(0,1)
        for key, val in self.valWeightDict.items():
            if val >= num:
                return key

粗糙的，但可能足够:

import random
weighted_choice = lambda s : random.choice(sum(([v]*wt for v,wt in s),[]))

这有用吗?

# define choices and relative weights
choices = [("WHITE",90), ("RED",8), ("GREEN",2)]

# initialize tally dict
tally = dict.fromkeys(choices, 0)

# tally up 1000 weighted choices
for i in xrange(1000):
    tally[weighted_choice(choices)] += 1

print tally.items()

打印:

[('WHITE', 904), ('GREEN', 22), ('RED', 74)]

假设所有权重都是整数。它们的和不一定是100，我这么做只是为了让测试结果更容易理解。(如果权重是浮点数，则将它们都乘以10，直到所有权重>= 1。)

weights = [.6, .2, .001, .199]
while any(w < 1.0 for w in weights):
    weights = [w*10 for w in weights]
weights = map(int, weights)

def weighted_choice(choices):
   total = sum(w for c, w in choices)
   r = random.uniform(0, total)
   upto = 0
   for c, w in choices:
      if upto + w >= r:
         return c
      upto += w
   assert False, "Shouldn't get here"