对于oracle，我使用自己编写的java程序oracle-ddl2svn自动跟踪oracle DDL方案在SVN中的变化

是的。代码就是代码。我的经验法则是，我需要能够从头构建和部署应用程序，而不需要查看开发或生产机器。

必须阅读将数据库置于版本控制之下。查看K. Scott Allen的系列帖子。

When it comes to version control, the database is often a second or even third-class citizen. From what I've seen, teams that would never think of writing code without version control in a million years-- and rightly so-- can somehow be completely oblivious to the need for version control around the critical databases their applications rely on. I don't know how you can call yourself a software engineer and maintain a straight face when your database isn't under exactly the same rigorous level of source control as the rest of your code. Don't let this happen to you. Get your database under version control.

我使用ActiveRecord Migrations。这个Ruby gem可以在Rails项目之外使用，并且有适配器可以处理您遇到的大多数数据库。我的建议:如果你能够在Postgres上运行你的项目，你就会得到事务性的模式迁移。这意味着如果迁移只应用了一半，您不会最终得到一个损坏的数据库。

I've heard people say you absolutely have to keep your schemas in the database. I'm not sure I agree. This really depends on the system you're working with. If your system is relatively small and the data is not terribly important. And the the speed at which you need to bring another development environment online is crucial.. then yes.. you can benefit from it. However when your schema is useless without the data and the database is extremely large, it becomes virtually impossible to "source control" your database. Sure, you can still keep your DDL code in source control but that's essentially useless. You can't get the data needed without backup/restore.

在大型数据库开发工作中，我发现备份和恢复是首选的回滚选项。当然，你可以在源代码控制中保留过程、视图、函数等，但要保留表。SQL不是必需的。此外，如果您的部署过程是无懈可击的，那么您很可能永远不需要“回滚”您的生产环境。

RedGate软件提供了一些很棒的工具，可以帮助你对数据库进行版本化。确保让开发者为开发工作构建自己的独立本地数据库，而不是依赖于“开发服务器”，因为“开发服务器”有时可能停机，有时也可能不停机。