最近，我正在尝试将EF5升级为EF6样本项目。示例项目的表格有十进制(5,2)类型的列。数据库迁移成功完成。但是，初始数据种子产生了异常。

模型:

    public partial class Weather
    {
    ...
    public decimal TMax {get;set;}
    public decimal TMin {get;set;}
    ...
    }

配置错误:

public partial class WeatherMap : EntityTypeConfiguration<Weather>
{

    public WeatherMap()
    {
        ...
        this.Property(t => t.TMax).HasColumnName("TMax");
        this.Property(t => t.TMin).HasColumnName("TMin");
        ...
    }
}

数据:

    internal static Weather[] data = new Weather[365]
    {
      new Weather() {...,TMax = 3.30M,TMin = -12.00M,...},
      new Weather() {...,TMax = 5.20M,TMin = -10.00M,...},
      new Weather() {...,TMax = 3.20M,TMin = -8.00M,...},
      new Weather() {...,TMax = 11.00M,TMin = -7.00M,...},
      new Weather() {...,TMax = 9.00M,TMin = 0.00M,...},
    };

我发现了问题，播种数据有精度值，但配置没有精度和比例参数。在样本表中用十进制(10,0)定义的TMax和TMin字段。

正确配置:

public partial class WeatherMap : EntityTypeConfiguration<Weather>
{

    public WeatherMap()
    {
        ...
        this.Property(t => t.TMax).HasPrecision(5,2).HasColumnName("TMax");
        this.Property(t => t.TMin).HasPrecision(5,2).HasColumnName("TMin");
        ...
    }
}

我的示例项目运行在:MySql 5.6.14, Devart.Data。MySql, MVC4， .Net 4.5.1, EF6.01

致以最亲切的问候。

如果您试图插入一个唯一的约束情况，也会发生这种情况，即如果每个雇主只能有一种类型的地址，而您试图插入第二个具有相同类型的相同雇主的地址，您将遇到相同的问题。

OR

如果所有被赋值的对象属性，都被赋值与之前相同，也会发生这种情况。

        using(var db = new MyContext())
        {
            var address = db.Addresses.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Id == Id);

            address.StreetAddress = StreetAddress; // if you are assigning   
            address.City = City;                   // all of the same values
            address.State = State;                 // as they are
            address.ZipCode = ZipCode;             // in the database    

            db.SaveChanges();           // Then this will throw that exception
        }

    public void Save(object entity)
    {
        using (var transaction = Connection.BeginTransaction())
        {
        try
                {
                    SaveChanges();
                    transaction.Commit();
                }
                catch (OptimisticConcurrencyException)
                {
                    if (ObjectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntry(entity).State == EntityState.Deleted || ObjectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntry(entity).State == EntityState.Modified)
                        this.Refresh(RefreshMode.StoreWins, entity);
                    else if (ObjectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntry(entity).State == EntityState.Added)
                        Detach(entity);
                    AcceptAllChanges(); 
                    transaction.Commit();
                }
        }
    }

以上的答案都没有完全涵盖我的情况和解决方案。

在MVC5控制器中抛出错误的代码:

        if (ModelState.IsValid)
        {
            db.Entry(object).State = EntityState.Modified; 
            db.SaveChanges(); // line that threw exception
            return RedirectToAction("Index");
        }

当我从Edit视图保存对象时，我收到了这个异常。它抛出它的原因是，当我回去保存它时，我修改了构成对象主键的属性。因此，将其状态设置为Modified对EF没有任何意义——它是一个新条目，而不是先前保存的条目。

你可以通过以下两种方法来解决这个问题:A)修改save调用来添加对象;B)在edit时不要更改主键。B)。

该问题是由以下两种原因之一引起的:-

You tried to update a row with one or more properties are Concurrency Mode: Fixed .. and the Optimistic Concurrency prevented the data from being saved. Ie. some changed the row data between the time you received the server data and when you saved your server data. You tried to update or delete a row but the row doesn't exist. Another example of someone changing the data (in this case, removing) in between a retrieve then save OR you're flat our trying to update a field which is not an Identity (ie. StoreGeneratedPattern = Computed) and that row doesn't exist.

这件事刚刚发生在我身上。我正在运行Aurora (AWS MySQL)，并试图将记录添加到表中。在模型中标记为[Key]的字段被映射到表中的一个自动递增字段…至少我是这么想的。它被设置为主键，但没有设置为自动递增。所以将它设置为自动递增解决了我的问题。