TypeScript中基于承诺的递归解决方案，使用Array.flat()处理嵌套返回。

import { resolve } from 'path'
import { Dirent } from 'fs'
import * as fs from 'fs'

function getFiles(root: string): Promise<string[]> {
 return fs.promises
   .readdir(root, { withFileTypes: true })
   .then(dirents => {
      const mapToPath = (r: string) => (dirent: Dirent): string => resolve(r, dirent.name)
      const directoryPaths = dirents.filter(a => a.isDirectory()).map(mapToPath(root))
      const filePaths = dirents.filter(a => a.isFile()).map(mapToPath(root))

     return Promise.all<string>([
       ...directoryPaths.map(a => getFiles(a, include)).flat(),
       ...filePaths.map(a => Promise.resolve(a))
     ]).then(a => a.flat())
  })
}

看看装载机 https://npmjs.org/package/loaddir

npm无处不在

  loaddir = require('loaddir')

  allJavascripts = []
  loaddir({
    path: __dirname + '/public/javascripts',
    callback: function(){  allJavascripts.push(this.relativePath + this.baseName); }
  })

如果还需要扩展名，可以使用fileName而不是baseName。

一个额外的好处是，它也会监视文件，并再次调用回调。有大量的配置选项使它非常灵活。

我只是在短时间内用加载器从红宝石重造了守卫宝石

使用承诺(Q)以函数式风格解决此问题:

var fs = require('fs'),
    fsPath = require('path'),
    Q = require('q');

var walk = function (dir) {
  return Q.ninvoke(fs, 'readdir', dir).then(function (files) {

    return Q.all(files.map(function (file) {

      file = fsPath.join(dir, file);
      return Q.ninvoke(fs, 'lstat', file).then(function (stat) {

        if (stat.isDirectory()) {
          return walk(file);
        } else {
          return [file];
        }
      });
    }));
  }).then(function (files) {
    return files.reduce(function (pre, cur) {
      return pre.concat(cur);
    });
  });
};

它返回一个数组的promise，所以你可以这样使用它:

walk('/home/mypath').then(function (files) { console.log(files); });

如果你想使用npm包，扳手是很好的选择。

var wrench = require("wrench");

var files = wrench.readdirSyncRecursive("directory");

wrench.readdirRecursive("directory", function (error, files) {
    // live your dreams
});

编辑(2018): 作者在2015年弃用了这个包:

扳手.js已弃用，并且在相当长的一段时间内没有更新。我强烈建议使用fs-extra来执行任何额外的文件系统操作。

独立承诺实现

在这个例子中，我使用的是when.js承诺库。

var fs = require('fs')
, path = require('path')
, when = require('when')
, nodefn = require('when/node/function');

function walk (directory, includeDir) {
    var results = [];
    return when.map(nodefn.call(fs.readdir, directory), function(file) {
        file = path.join(directory, file);
        return nodefn.call(fs.stat, file).then(function(stat) {
            if (stat.isFile()) { return results.push(file); }
            if (includeDir) { results.push(file + path.sep); }
            return walk(file, includeDir).then(function(filesInDir) {
                results = results.concat(filesInDir);
            });
        });
    }).then(function() {
        return results;
    });
};

walk(__dirname).then(function(files) {
    console.log(files);
}).otherwise(function(error) {
    console.error(error.stack || error);
});

我包含了一个可选参数includeDir，如果设置为true，它将在文件列表中包含目录。

There are basically two ways of accomplishing this. In an async environment you'll notice that there are two kinds of loops: serial and parallel. A serial loop waits for one iteration to complete before it moves onto the next iteration - this guarantees that every iteration of the loop completes in order. In a parallel loop, all the iterations are started at the same time, and one may complete before another, however, it is much faster than a serial loop. So in this case, it's probably better to use a parallel loop because it doesn't matter what order the walk completes in, just as long as it completes and returns the results (unless you want them in order).

一个平行循环看起来是这样的:

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
  var results = [];
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) return done(err);
    var pending = list.length;
    if (!pending) return done(null, results);
    list.forEach(function(file) {
      file = path.resolve(dir, file);
      fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          walk(file, function(err, res) {
            results = results.concat(res);
            if (!--pending) done(null, results);
          });
        } else {
          results.push(file);
          if (!--pending) done(null, results);
        }
      });
    });
  });
};

一个串行循环看起来像这样:

var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
  var results = [];
  fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
    if (err) return done(err);
    var i = 0;
    (function next() {
      var file = list[i++];
      if (!file) return done(null, results);
      file = path.resolve(dir, file);
      fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
        if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
          walk(file, function(err, res) {
            results = results.concat(res);
            next();
          });
        } else {
          results.push(file);
          next();
        }
      });
    })();
  });
};

并且在你的主目录中测试它(警告:如果你的主目录中有很多东西，结果列表将会非常大):

walk(process.env.HOME, function(err, results) {
  if (err) throw err;
  console.log(results);
});

编辑:改进的示例。