我需要合并多个字典,这是我有例如:
dict1 = {1:{"a":{A}}, 2:{"b":{B}}}
dict2 = {2:{"c":{C}}, 3:{"d":{D}}}
A、B、C和D是树的叶子,比如{"info1":"value", "info2":"value2"}
字典的级别(深度)未知,可能是{2:{"c":{"z":{"y":{c}}}}}
在我的例子中,它表示一个目录/文件结构,节点是文档,叶子是文件。
我想将它们合并得到:
dict3 = {1:{"a":{A}}, 2:{"b":{B},"c":{C}}, 3:{"d":{D}}}
我不确定如何用Python轻松做到这一点。
由于dictviews支持集合操作,我能够极大地简化jterrace的答案。
def merge(dict1, dict2):
for k in dict1.keys() - dict2.keys():
yield (k, dict1[k])
for k in dict2.keys() - dict1.keys():
yield (k, dict2[k])
for k in dict1.keys() & dict2.keys():
yield (k, dict(merge(dict1[k], dict2[k])))
任何将dict与非dict(技术上讲,一个带有'keys'方法的对象和一个没有'keys'方法的对象)组合的尝试都会引发AttributeError。这包括对函数的初始调用和递归调用。这正是我想要的,所以我离开了。您可以很容易地捕获递归调用抛出的AttributeErrors,然后生成您想要的任何值。
这个问题的一个问题是字典的值可以是任意复杂的数据块。基于这些和其他答案,我得出了以下代码:
class YamlReaderError(Exception):
pass
def data_merge(a, b):
"""merges b into a and return merged result
NOTE: tuples and arbitrary objects are not handled as it is totally ambiguous what should happen"""
key = None
# ## debug output
# sys.stderr.write("DEBUG: %s to %s\n" %(b,a))
try:
if a is None or isinstance(a, str) or isinstance(a, unicode) or isinstance(a, int) or isinstance(a, long) or isinstance(a, float):
# border case for first run or if a is a primitive
a = b
elif isinstance(a, list):
# lists can be only appended
if isinstance(b, list):
# merge lists
a.extend(b)
else:
# append to list
a.append(b)
elif isinstance(a, dict):
# dicts must be merged
if isinstance(b, dict):
for key in b:
if key in a:
a[key] = data_merge(a[key], b[key])
else:
a[key] = b[key]
else:
raise YamlReaderError('Cannot merge non-dict "%s" into dict "%s"' % (b, a))
else:
raise YamlReaderError('NOT IMPLEMENTED "%s" into "%s"' % (b, a))
except TypeError, e:
raise YamlReaderError('TypeError "%s" in key "%s" when merging "%s" into "%s"' % (e, key, b, a))
return a
我的用例是合并YAML文件,其中我只需要处理可能的数据类型的子集。因此我可以忽略元组和其他对象。对我来说,合理的合并逻辑意味着
取代标量
添加列表
通过添加缺失键和更新现有键来合并字典
其他任何事情和不可预见的事情都会导致错误。
这实际上是相当棘手的-特别是如果你想要一个有用的错误消息时,事情是不一致的,同时正确地接受重复但一致的条目(这是这里没有其他答案做的..)。
假设你没有大量的条目,递归函数是最简单的:
from functools import reduce
def merge(a, b, path=None):
"merges b into a"
if path is None: path = []
for key in b:
if key in a:
if isinstance(a[key], dict) and isinstance(b[key], dict):
merge(a[key], b[key], path + [str(key)])
elif a[key] == b[key]:
pass # same leaf value
else:
raise Exception('Conflict at %s' % '.'.join(path + [str(key)]))
else:
a[key] = b[key]
return a
# works
print(merge({1:{"a":"A"},2:{"b":"B"}}, {2:{"c":"C"},3:{"d":"D"}}))
# has conflict
merge({1:{"a":"A"},2:{"b":"B"}}, {1:{"a":"A"},2:{"b":"C"}})
注意,这会使a发生变化——b的内容被添加到a(也会返回a)。如果你想保留a,你可以叫它merge(dict(a) b)
Agf指出(下面),你可能有两个以上的字典,在这种情况下,你可以使用:
reduce(merge, [dict1, dict2, dict3...])
所有内容都将被添加到dict1中。
注意:我编辑了我的初始答案以改变第一个参数;这使得“reduce”更容易解释
class Utils(object):
"""
>>> a = { 'first' : { 'all_rows' : { 'pass' : 'dog', 'number' : '1' } } }
>>> b = { 'first' : { 'all_rows' : { 'fail' : 'cat', 'number' : '5' } } }
>>> Utils.merge_dict(b, a) == { 'first' : { 'all_rows' : { 'pass' : 'dog', 'fail' : 'cat', 'number' : '5' } } }
True
>>> main = {'a': {'b': {'test': 'bug'}, 'c': 'C'}}
>>> suply = {'a': {'b': 2, 'd': 'D', 'c': {'test': 'bug2'}}}
>>> Utils.merge_dict(main, suply) == {'a': {'b': {'test': 'bug'}, 'c': 'C', 'd': 'D'}}
True
"""
@staticmethod
def merge_dict(main, suply):
"""
获取融合的字典,以main为主,suply补充,冲突时以main为准
:return:
"""
for key, value in suply.items():
if key in main:
if isinstance(main[key], dict):
if isinstance(value, dict):
Utils.merge_dict(main[key], value)
else:
pass
else:
pass
else:
main[key] = value
return main
if __name__ == '__main__':
import doctest
doctest.testmod()
如果有人想要另一种方法来解决这个问题,这是我的解决方案。
优点:简洁、声明性和函数式风格(递归,没有突变)。
潜在缺点:这可能不是你想要的合并。查阅文档字符串以了解语义。
def deep_merge(a, b):
"""
Merge two values, with `b` taking precedence over `a`.
Semantics:
- If either `a` or `b` is not a dictionary, `a` will be returned only if
`b` is `None`. Otherwise `b` will be returned.
- If both values are dictionaries, they are merged as follows:
* Each key that is found only in `a` or only in `b` will be included in
the output collection with its value intact.
* For any key in common between `a` and `b`, the corresponding values
will be merged with the same semantics.
"""
if not isinstance(a, dict) or not isinstance(b, dict):
return a if b is None else b
else:
# If we're here, both a and b must be dictionaries or subtypes thereof.
# Compute set of all keys in both dictionaries.
keys = set(a.keys()) | set(b.keys())
# Build output dictionary, merging recursively values with common keys,
# where `None` is used to mean the absence of a value.
return {
key: deep_merge(a.get(key), b.get(key))
for key in keys
}