如果你不需要经常插入元素，那么向量会更有效。它具有比列表更好的CPU缓存位置。换句话说，访问一个元素使得下一个元素很有可能存在于缓存中，并且可以在不读取慢速RAM的情况下被检索。

基本上，vector是一个具有自动内存管理功能的数组。数据在内存中是连续的。试图在中间插入数据是一项代价高昂的操作。

在列表中，数据存储在不相关的内存位置。在中间插入数据并不需要复制一些数据来为新数据腾出空间。

为了更具体地回答你的问题，我将引用这一页

对于访问元素以及从序列末尾添加或删除元素，向量通常是最有效的。对于涉及在末尾以外的位置插入或删除元素的操作，它们的性能不如deques和list，并且迭代器和引用的一致性也不如list。

在向量和列表的情况下，对我来说，主要的区别如下:

向量

A vector stores its elements in contiguous memory. Therefore, random access is possible inside a vector which means that accessing an element of a vector is very fast because we can simply multiply the base address with the item index to access that element. In fact, it takes only O(1) or constant time for this purpose. Since a vector basically wraps an array, every time you insert an element into the vector (dynamic array), it has to resize itself by finding a new contiguous block of memory to accommodate the new elements which is time-costly. It does not consume extra memory to store any pointers to other elements within it.

list

A list stores its elements in non-contiguous memory. Therefore, random access is not possible inside a list which means that to access its elements we have to use the pointers and traverse the list which is slower relative to vector. This takes O(n) or linear time which is slower than O(1). Since a list uses non-contiguous memory, the time taken to insert an element inside a list is a lot more efficient than in the case of its vector counterpart because reallocation of memory is avoided. It consumes extra memory to store pointers to the element before and after a particular element.

因此，记住这些区别，我们通常会考虑内存、频繁的随机访问和插入来决定给定场景中向量和列表的胜者。

在表格中总结答案以供快速参考:

当你在序列中间有很多插入或删除时。例如，内存管理器。

如果你不需要经常插入元素，那么向量会更有效。它具有比列表更好的CPU缓存位置。换句话说，访问一个元素使得下一个元素很有可能存在于缓存中，并且可以在不读取慢速RAM的情况下被检索。