string A = null;
//a now is reversed and you can use it
A = SimulateStrReverse.StrReverse("your string");

public static class SimulateStrReverse
{
    public static string StrReverse(string expression)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(expression))
            return string.Empty;

        string reversedString = string.Empty;
        for (int charIndex = expression.Length - 1; charIndex >= 0; charIndex--)
        {
            reversedString += expression[charIndex];
        }
        return reversedString;
    }
}

非常简单

static void Reverse()
    {
        string str = "PankajRawat";
        var arr = str.ToCharArray();
        for (int i = str.Length-1; i >= 0; i--)
        {
            Console.Write(arr[i]);
        }
    }

如果字符串只包含ASCII字符，则可以使用此方法。

    public static string ASCIIReverse(string s)
    {
        byte[] reversed = new byte[s.Length];

        int k = 0;
        for (int i = s.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
        {
            reversed[k++] = (byte)s[i];
        }

        return Encoding.ASCII.GetString(reversed);
    }

因为我喜欢两个答案-一个是使用字符串。创建，因此高性能和低分配和另一个正确性-使用StringInfo类，我决定需要一种组合方法。这是最终的字符串反转方法:)

private static string ReverseString(string str)
    {
        return string.Create(str.Length, str, (chars, state) =>
        {
            var enumerator = StringInfo.GetTextElementEnumerator(state);
            var position = state.Length;
            while (enumerator.MoveNext())
            {
                var cluster = ((string)enumerator.Current).AsSpan();
                cluster.CopyTo(chars.Slice(position - cluster.Length));
                position -= cluster.Length;
            }
        });
    }

还有一种更好的方法，使用StringInfo类的方法，它通过只返回索引来跳过Enumerator的大量字符串分配。

private static string ReverseString(string str)
    {
        return string.Create(str.Length, str, (chars, state) =>
        {
            var position = 0;
            var indexes = StringInfo.ParseCombiningCharacters(state); // skips string creation
            var stateSpan = state.AsSpan();
            for (int len = indexes.Length, i = len - 1; i >= 0; i--)
            {
                var index = indexes[i];
                var spanLength = i == len - 1 ? state.Length - index : indexes[i + 1] - index;
                stateSpan.Slice(index, spanLength).CopyTo(chars.Slice(position));
                position += spanLength;
            }
        });
    }

与LINQ解决方案相比的一些基准测试:

String length 20:

LINQ                       Mean: 2,355.5 ns   Allocated: 1440 B
string.Create              Mean:   851.0 ns   Allocated:  720 B
string.Create with indexes Mean:   466.4 ns   Allocated:  168 B

String length 450:

LINQ                          Mean: 34.33 us   Allocated: 22.98 KB
string.Create                 Mean:   19.13 us   Allocated: 14.98 KB
string.Create with indexes    Mean:   10.32 us   Allocated: 2.69 KB

看看维基百科的条目。它们实现了字符串。反向扩展法。这允许你编写这样的代码:

string s = "olleh";
s.Reverse();

他们还使用ToCharArray/Reverse组合，这是这个问题的其他答案所建议的。源代码如下所示:

public static string Reverse(this string input)
{
    char[] chars = input.ToCharArray();
    Array.Reverse(chars);
    return new String(chars);
}

我在面试中也被问到类似的问题。这是我的回答，尽管它在性能上可能没有其他答案那么快。我的问题是“创建一个类，它可以有一个反向打印字符串的方法”:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;

namespace BackwardsTest
{
    class PrintBackwards
    {
        public static void print(string param)
        {
            if (param == null || param.Length == 0)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("string is null");
                return;
            }
            List<char> list = new List<char>();
            string returned = null;
            foreach(char d in param)
            {
                list.Add(d);
            }
            for(int i = list.Count(); i > 0; i--)
            {
                returned = returned + list[list.Count - 1];
                list.RemoveAt(list.Count - 1);
            }
            Console.WriteLine(returned);
        }
    }
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            string test = "I want to print backwards";
            PrintBackwards.print(test);
            System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(5000);
        }
    }
}