"throw"和"throw ex"有区别吗?

有一些帖子问这两者之间已经有什么区别了。(为什么我要提这个…)

但我的问题在某种程度上是不同的，我在另一种错误处理方法中调用了“throw ex”。

public class Program {
    public static void Main(string[] args) {
        try {
            // something
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            HandleException(ex);
        }
    }

    private static void HandleException(Exception ex) {
        if (ex is ThreadAbortException) {
            // ignore then,
            return;
        }
        if (ex is ArgumentOutOfRangeException) { 
            // Log then,
            throw ex;
        }
        if (ex is InvalidOperationException) {
            // Show message then,
            throw ex;
        }
        // and so on.
    }
}

如果在主线中使用try和catch，那么我会使用throw;重新抛出错误。但是在上面的简单代码中，所有异常都通过HandleException

是否抛出前任;在HandleException内部调用时，与调用throw有相同的效果?

当前回答

(我之前发过，@Marc Gravell纠正了我)

以下是其中的区别:

static void Main(string[] args) {
    try {
        ThrowException1(); // line 19
    } catch (Exception x) {
        Console.WriteLine("Exception 1:");
        Console.WriteLine(x.StackTrace);
    }
    try {
        ThrowException2(); // line 25
    } catch (Exception x) {
        Console.WriteLine("Exception 2:");
        Console.WriteLine(x.StackTrace);
    }
}

private static void ThrowException1() {
    try {
        DivByZero(); // line 34
    } catch {
        throw; // line 36
    }
}
private static void ThrowException2() {
    try {
        DivByZero(); // line 41
    } catch (Exception ex) {
        throw ex; // line 43
    }
}

private static void DivByZero() {
    int x = 0;
    int y = 1 / x; // line 49
}

这是输出:

Exception 1:
   at UnitTester.Program.DivByZero() in <snip>\Dev\UnitTester\Program.cs:line 49
   at UnitTester.Program.ThrowException1() in <snip>\Dev\UnitTester\Program.cs:line 36
   at UnitTester.Program.TestExceptions() in <snip>\Dev\UnitTester\Program.cs:line 19

Exception 2:
   at UnitTester.Program.ThrowException2() in <snip>\Dev\UnitTester\Program.cs:line 43
   at UnitTester.Program.TestExceptions() in <snip>\Dev\UnitTester\Program.cs:line 25

您可以看到，在例外1中，堆栈跟踪返回到DivByZero()方法，而在例外2中则没有。

但是请注意，在ThrowException1()和ThrowException2()中显示的行号是throw语句的行号，而不是调用DivByZero()的行号，现在我稍微思考一下，这可能是有意义的……

释放模式输出

例外1:

at ConsoleAppBasics.Program.ThrowException1()
at ConsoleAppBasics.Program.Main(String[] args)

例外2:

at ConsoleAppBasics.Program.ThrowException2()
at ConsoleAppBasics.Program.Main(String[] args)

它是否只在调试模式下维护原始的stackTrace ?

2009-04-22 11:29:47

其他回答

为了扩展Lucero的回答，下面介绍如何在不丢失原始堆栈跟踪的情况下实现原始代码的意图。

public class Program {
    public static void Main(string[] args) {
        try {
            // something
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            if (!HandleException(ex)) throw;
        }
    }

    /// <returns>
    ///   true if the exception has been handled;
    ///   false if exception should be passed along
    /// </returns>
    private static bool HandleException(Exception ex) {
        if (ex is ThreadAbortException) {
            // ignore then,
            return true;
        }
        if (ex is ArgumentOutOfRangeException) { 
            // Log then,
            return false;
        }
        if (ex is InvalidOperationException) {
            // Show message then,
            return false;
        }
        // and so on.
    }
}

2021-08-12 19:49:52

看这里:http://blog-mstechnology.blogspot.de/2010/06/throw-vs-throw-ex.html

把:

try 
{
    // do some operation that can fail
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
    // do some local cleanup
    throw;
}

它保留了异常堆栈信息

这叫做"重扔"

如果想要抛出新的异常，

throw new ApplicationException("operation failed!");

把交货:

try
{
    // do some operation that can fail
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
    // do some local cleanup
    throw ex;
}

它不会发送异常堆栈信息

这叫做“打破堆栈”

如果想要抛出新的异常，

throw new ApplicationException("operation failed!",ex);

2014-07-18 20:33:08

是的，这是有区别的。

throw ex resets the stack trace (so your errors would appear to originate from HandleException) throw doesn't - the original offender would be preserved. static void Main(string[] args) { try { Method2(); } catch (Exception ex) { Console.Write(ex.StackTrace.ToString()); Console.ReadKey(); } } private static void Method2() { try { Method1(); } catch (Exception ex) { //throw ex resets the stack trace Coming from Method 1 and propogates it to the caller(Main) throw ex; } } private static void Method1() { try { throw new Exception("Inside Method1"); } catch (Exception) { throw; } }

2009-04-08 14:24:56

最好使用throw而不是throw ex。

Throw ex重置原始堆栈跟踪，无法找到之前的堆栈跟踪。

如果使用throw，我们将得到一个完整的堆栈跟踪。

2020-12-03 02:37:41