我有一些测试数据，想为每个项目创建一个单元测试。我的第一个想法是这样做的:
import unittest
l = [["foo", "a", "a",], ["bar", "a", "b"], ["lee", "b", "b"]]
class TestSequence(unittest.TestCase):
def testsample(self):
for name, a,b in l:
print "test", name
self.assertEqual(a,b)
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
这样做的缺点是它在一个测试中处理所有数据。我想在飞行中为每个项目生成一个测试。有什么建议吗?
当前回答
只使用元类，如这里所示;
class DocTestMeta(type):
"""
Test functions are generated in metaclass due to the way some
test loaders work. For example, setupClass() won't get called
unless there are other existing test methods, and will also
prevent unit test loader logic being called before the test
methods have been defined.
"""
def __init__(self, name, bases, attrs):
super(DocTestMeta, self).__init__(name, bases, attrs)
def __new__(cls, name, bases, attrs):
def func(self):
"""Inner test method goes here"""
self.assertTrue(1)
func.__name__ = 'test_sample'
attrs[func.__name__] = func
return super(DocTestMeta, cls).__new__(cls, name, bases, attrs)
class ExampleTestCase(TestCase):
"""Our example test case, with no methods defined"""
__metaclass__ = DocTestMeta
输出:
test_sample (ExampleTestCase) ... OK
其他回答
还有一个假说，它增加了模糊或基于属性的测试。
这是一种非常强大的测试方法。
这实际上与之前的回答中提到的parameterized相同，但具体到unittest:
def sub_test(param_list):
"""Decorates a test case to run it as a set of subtests."""
def decorator(f):
@functools.wraps(f)
def wrapped(self):
for param in param_list:
with self.subTest(**param):
f(self, **param)
return wrapped
return decorator
使用示例:
class TestStuff(unittest.TestCase):
@sub_test([
dict(arg1='a', arg2='b'),
dict(arg1='x', arg2='y'),
])
def test_stuff(self, arg1, arg2):
...
这可以通过使用pytest来完成。只需要编写test_me.py文件的内容:
import pytest
@pytest.mark.parametrize('name, left, right', [['foo', 'a', 'a'],
['bar', 'a', 'b'],
['baz', 'b', 'b']])
def test_me(name, left, right):
assert left == right, name
并使用py命令运行测试。Test——tb=短test_me.py。然后输出如下所示:
=========================== test session starts ============================
platform darwin -- Python 2.7.6 -- py-1.4.23 -- pytest-2.6.1
collected 3 items
test_me.py .F.
================================= FAILURES =================================
_____________________________ test_me[bar-a-b] _____________________________
test_me.py:8: in test_me
assert left == right, name
E AssertionError: bar
==================== 1 failed, 2 passed in 0.01 seconds ====================
这很简单!此外，pytest还有更多的功能，如fixture、标记、断言等。
以下是我的解决方案。我发现这个方法很有用:
Should work for unittest.Testcase and unittest discover Have a set of tests to be run for different parameter settings. Very simple and no dependency on other packages import unittest class BaseClass(unittest.TestCase): def setUp(self): self.param = 2 self.base = 2 def test_me(self): self.assertGreaterEqual(5, self.param+self.base) def test_me_too(self): self.assertLessEqual(3, self.param+self.base) class Child_One(BaseClass): def setUp(self): BaseClass.setUp(self) self.param = 4 class Child_Two(BaseClass): def setUp(self): BaseClass.setUp(self) self.param = 1
我使用元类和装饰器来生成测试。您可以检查我的实现python_wrap_cases。这个库不需要任何测试框架。
你的例子:
import unittest
from python_wrap_cases import wrap_case
@wrap_case
class TestSequence(unittest.TestCase):
@wrap_case("foo", "a", "a")
@wrap_case("bar", "a", "b")
@wrap_case("lee", "b", "b")
def testsample(self, name, a, b):
print "test", name
self.assertEqual(a, b)
控制台输出:
testsample_u'bar'_u'a'_u'b' (tests.example.test_stackoverflow.TestSequence) ... test bar
FAIL
testsample_u'foo'_u'a'_u'a' (tests.example.test_stackoverflow.TestSequence) ... test foo
ok
testsample_u'lee'_u'b'_u'b' (tests.example.test_stackoverflow.TestSequence) ... test lee
ok
你也可以使用发电机。例如，这段代码用参数a__list和b__list生成所有可能的测试组合
import unittest
from python_wrap_cases import wrap_case
@wrap_case
class TestSequence(unittest.TestCase):
@wrap_case(a__list=["a", "b"], b__list=["a", "b"])
def testsample(self, a, b):
self.assertEqual(a, b)
控制台输出:
testsample_a(u'a')_b(u'a') (tests.example.test_stackoverflow.TestSequence) ... ok
testsample_a(u'a')_b(u'b') (tests.example.test_stackoverflow.TestSequence) ... FAIL
testsample_a(u'b')_b(u'a') (tests.example.test_stackoverflow.TestSequence) ... FAIL
testsample_a(u'b')_b(u'b') (tests.example.test_stackoverflow.TestSequence) ... ok
