我有一个应用程序,我正在寻找一个文本文件,如果对文件做了任何更改,我使用OnChanged事件处理程序来处理事件。我正在使用NotifyFilters。LastWriteTime,但是事件仍然被触发两次。这是代码。

public void Initialize()
{
   FileSystemWatcher _fileWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
  _fileWatcher.Path = "C:\\Folder";
  _fileWatcher.NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite;
  _fileWatcher.Filter = "Version.txt";
  _fileWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
  _fileWatcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
}

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
   .......
}

在我的情况下,OnChanged被调用两次,当我改变文本文件version.txt并保存它。


当前回答

以下是我的方法:

// Consider having a List<String> named _changedFiles

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    lock (_changedFiles)
    {
        if (_changedFiles.Contains(e.FullPath))
        {
            return;
        }
        _changedFiles.Add(e.FullPath);
    }

    // do your stuff

    System.Timers.Timer timer = new Timer(1000) { AutoReset = false };
    timer.Elapsed += (timerElapsedSender, timerElapsedArgs) =>
    {
        lock (_changedFiles)
        {
            _changedFiles.Remove(e.FullPath);
        }
    };
   timer.Start();
}

这是我在一个项目中用来解决这个问题的解决方案,在该项目中,我将文件作为附件发送到邮件中。 它可以很容易地避免两次触发事件,即使是一个较小的定时器间隔,但在我的情况下,1000是可以的,因为我更喜欢错过一些变化,而不是每秒用> 1条消息淹没邮箱。 至少在同时更改多个文件的情况下,它可以正常工作。

Another solution I've thought of would be to replace the list with a dictionary mapping files to their respective MD5, so you wouldn't have to choose an arbitrary interval since you wouldn't have to delete the entry but update its value, and cancel your stuff if it hasn't changed. It has the downside of having a Dictionary growing in memory as files are monitored and eating more and more memory, but I've read somewhere that the amount of files monitored depends on the FSW's internal buffer, so maybe not that critical. Dunno how MD5 computing time would affect your code's performances either, careful =\

其他回答

一个可能的“黑客”是使用响应式扩展来限制事件,例如:

var watcher = new FileSystemWatcher("./");

Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(watcher, "Changed")
            .Throttle(new TimeSpan(500000))
            .Subscribe(HandleChangeEvent);

watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

在本例中,我将设置为50ms,在我的系统上这就足够了,但更高的值应该更安全。(就像我说的,这仍然是一个“hack”)。

试试这个!

string temp="";

public void Initialize()
{
   FileSystemWatcher _fileWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
  _fileWatcher.Path = "C:\\Folder";
  _fileWatcher.NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite;
  _fileWatcher.Filter = "Version.txt";
  _fileWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
  _fileWatcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
}

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
   .......
if(temp=="")
{
   //do thing you want.
   temp = e.name //name of text file.
}else if(temp !="" && temp != e.name)
{
   //do thing you want.
   temp = e.name //name of text file.
}else
{
  //second fire ignored.
}

}

我已经在我的委托中使用以下策略“修复”了这个问题:

// fsw_ is the FileSystemWatcher instance used by my application.

private void OnDirectoryChanged(...)
{
   try
   {
      fsw_.EnableRaisingEvents = false;

      /* do my stuff once asynchronously */
   }

   finally
   {
      fsw_.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
   }
}

主要原因是 第一个事件的最后一次访问时间是当前时间(文件写入或更改时间)。 第二个事件是文件最初的最后一次访问时间。 我在代码下解决。

        var lastRead = DateTime.MinValue;

        Watcher = new FileSystemWatcher(...)
        {
            NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.FileName | NotifyFilters.LastWrite,
            Filter = "*.dll",
            IncludeSubdirectories = false,
        };
        Watcher.Changed += (senderObject, ea) =>
        {
            var now = DateTime.Now;
            var lastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime(ea.FullPath);

            if (now == lastWriteTime)
            {
                return;
            }

            if (lastWriteTime != lastRead)
            {
                // do something...
                lastRead = lastWriteTime;
            }
        };

        Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

我用了n种更简单的方法。

布尔-如果正在进行某项操作,则为true。当它结束时,false。 在处理之前,将其添加到HashSet。这样我就不会重复元素了。 每隔30分钟,计时器的事件就会运行一次,如果没有作业正在执行,它就会清除列表(just hashset = new hashset)。