这个代码对我有用。

        private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {

        string fullFilePath = e.FullPath.ToString();
        string fullURL = buildTheUrlFromStudyXML(fullFilePath);

        System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("iexplore", fullURL);

        Timer timer = new Timer();
        ((FileSystemWatcher)source).Changed -= new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
        timer.Interval = 1000;
        timer.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(t_Elapsed);
        timer.Start();
    }

    private void t_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
    {
        ((Timer)sender).Stop();
        theWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
    }

以下是我的方法:

// Consider having a List<String> named _changedFiles

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    lock (_changedFiles)
    {
        if (_changedFiles.Contains(e.FullPath))
        {
            return;
        }
        _changedFiles.Add(e.FullPath);
    }

    // do your stuff

    System.Timers.Timer timer = new Timer(1000) { AutoReset = false };
    timer.Elapsed += (timerElapsedSender, timerElapsedArgs) =>
    {
        lock (_changedFiles)
        {
            _changedFiles.Remove(e.FullPath);
        }
    };
   timer.Start();
}

这是我在一个项目中用来解决这个问题的解决方案，在该项目中，我将文件作为附件发送到邮件中。 它可以很容易地避免两次触发事件，即使是一个较小的定时器间隔，但在我的情况下，1000是可以的，因为我更喜欢错过一些变化，而不是每秒用> 1条消息淹没邮箱。 至少在同时更改多个文件的情况下，它可以正常工作。

Another solution I've thought of would be to replace the list with a dictionary mapping files to their respective MD5, so you wouldn't have to choose an arbitrary interval since you wouldn't have to delete the entry but update its value, and cancel your stuff if it hasn't changed. It has the downside of having a Dictionary growing in memory as files are monitored and eating more and more memory, but I've read somewhere that the amount of files monitored depends on the FSW's internal buffer, so maybe not that critical. Dunno how MD5 computing time would affect your code's performances either, careful =\

我们可以这么简单。这对我很管用。

private static void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e) 
{
    if (File.GetAttributes(e.FullPath) == FileAttributes.Directory)
        return;
    double timeSpan = DateTime.Now.Subtract(File.GetLastWriteTime(e.FullPath)).TotalSeconds;
    if (timeSpan > 1)
        return;
    Console.WriteLine($"Changed: {e.FullPath}");
}

我可以通过添加一个函数来检查缓冲区数组中的重复项来做到这一点。

然后使用计时器在数组X时间内未被修改后执行该操作: -每次有东西写入缓冲区时重置计时器 —对tick执行动作

这还捕获了另一种复制类型。如果修改文件夹内的文件，该文件夹也会引发Change事件。

Function is_duplicate(str1 As String) As Boolean
    If lb_actions_list.Items.Count = 0 Then
        Return False
    Else
        Dim compStr As String = lb_actions_list.Items(lb_actions_list.Items.Count - 1).ToString
        compStr = compStr.Substring(compStr.IndexOf("-") + 1).Trim

        If compStr <> str1 AndAlso compStr.parentDir <> str1 & "\" Then
            Return False
        Else
            Return True
        End If
    End If
End Function

Public Module extentions
<Extension()>
Public Function parentDir(ByVal aString As String) As String
    Return aString.Substring(0, CInt(InStrRev(aString, "\", aString.Length - 1)))
End Function
End Module

试试这个，效果很好

  private static readonly FileSystemWatcher Watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Watching....");

        Watcher.Path = @"D:\Temp\Watcher";
        Watcher.Changed += OnChanged;
        Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
        Console.ReadKey();
    }

    static void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        try
        {
            Watcher.Changed -= OnChanged;
            Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = false;
            Console.WriteLine($"File Changed. Name: {e.Name}");
        }
        catch (Exception exception)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(exception);
        }
        finally
        {
            Watcher.Changed += OnChanged;
            Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
        }
    }

这是另一种方法。现在，除了最后一个事件以外，所有事件都被抑制，而不是传播一系列事件中的第一个事件并抑制所有接下来的事件。我认为可以从这种方法中受益的场景更常见。

要做到这一点，我们必须使用滑动延迟。每个传入事件都会取消触发前一个事件的计时器，并重新启动计时器。这开启了一种可能性，即一系列永无止境的事件将永远推迟传播。为了简单起见，在下面的扩展方法中没有针对这种异常情况的规定。

public static class FileSystemWatcherExtensions
{
    public static IDisposable OnAnyEvent(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        WatcherChangeTypes changeTypes, FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
    {
        var cancellations = new Dictionary<string, CancellationTokenSource>(
            StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
        var locker = new object();
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Created))
            source.Created += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted))
            source.Deleted += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Changed))
            source.Changed += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Renamed))
            source.Renamed += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        return new Disposable(() =>
        {
            source.Created -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Deleted -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Changed -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Renamed -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        });

        async void FileSystemWatcher_Event(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
        {
            var key = e.FullPath;
            var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
            lock (locker)
            {
                if (cancellations.TryGetValue(key, out var existing))
                {
                    existing.Cancel();
                }
                cancellations[key] = cts;
            }
            try
            {
                await Task.Delay(delay, cts.Token);
                // Omitting ConfigureAwait(false) is intentional here.
                // Continuing in the captured context is desirable.
            }
            catch (TaskCanceledException)
            {
                return;
            }
            lock (locker)
            {
                if (cancellations.TryGetValue(key, out var existing)
                    && existing == cts)
                {
                    cancellations.Remove(key);
                }
            }
            cts.Dispose();
            handler(sender, e);
        }
    }

    public static IDisposable OnAllEvents(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.All, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnCreated(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Created, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnDeleted(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnChanged(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Changed, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnRenamed(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Renamed, handler, delay);

    private struct Disposable : IDisposable
    {
        private readonly Action _action;
        internal Disposable(Action action) => _action = action;
        public void Dispose() => _action?.Invoke();
    }
}

使用的例子:

myWatcher.OnAnyEvent(WatcherChangeTypes.Created | WatcherChangeTypes.Changed,
    MyFileSystemWatcher_Event, 100);

这一行将两个事件(Created和Changed)的订阅组合在一起。所以它大致相当于这些:

myWatcher.Created += MyFileSystemWatcher_Event;
myWatcher.Changed += MyFileSystemWatcher_Event;

不同之处在于，这两个事件被视为单一类型的事件，在这些事件快速连续的情况下，只有最后一个事件将被传播。例如，如果一个Created事件后面跟着两个Changed事件，并且这三个事件之间的时间间隔不超过100 msec，则只有第二个Changed事件将通过调用MyFileSystemWatcher_Event处理程序来传播，而前一个事件将被丢弃。